Better Births. Anna Brown

Читать онлайн.
Название Better Births
Автор произведения Anna Brown
Жанр Медицина
Серия
Издательство Медицина
Год выпуска 0
isbn 9781119628842



Скачать книгу

(Brown and Gallagher 2015). The concept of solidarity as applied to bioethics results in cohesion and integration connected through similar aspirations (Prainsack and Buyx 2011) of mother and midwife in an interdependent relationship to achieve a safe and effective birth outcome. An integration of solidarity with an ethos of midwifery practice can only be achieved through reciprocity of information, transparency and honesty between childbearing women and the health professional to maintain the ‘with woman’ concept (Dann 2007). In making rational choices, the midwife and woman must justify their decisions by considering the value that is placed on the birthing experience. This shared solidarity is demonstrated through mutually shared responsibility between mother and midwife who take on personal accountability for choices and decisions made.

      Advocacy has had an important role in professional/service user relationships. One of the ‘key messages’ in ‘Midwifery 2020: Delivering expectations’ is in the section ‘Developing the midwife's role in public health and reducing inequalities’ which states:

      Midwives should use their advocacy role for influencing and improving the health and wellbeing of women, children, and families. This will include making the economic case for committing resources so that the midwife can deliver public health messages in the antenatal and postnatal periods and ensuring that there is a midwifery contribution at policy, strategic, political, and international level (p. 7).

      Working alongside women, midwives exercise what has been referred to as ‘skilled companionship’ (Dierckx de Casterlé 2015) as they journey ‘with women’ through the birth and postnatally. Through this concept, midwives integrate skills and companionship and bring together the scientific and moral aspects of care. This requires midwives to be committed to provide an empathic presence during childbirth events. Women thus feel accompanied and supported. However, ethical challenges may arise should women make choices which are considered detrimental to the health of themselves, their baby or the midwife (Jenkinson et al. 2017). In such situations, midwives may experience ethical uncertainty or, perhaps, unpreparedness to respond ethically to women's needs and preferences. There may, for example, be a conflict of principles between respect for autonomy and beneficence/non‐maleficence and justice. The midwife should use her advocacy role by taking the lead to facilitate making decisions for the woman and meeting her holistic needs and interests through empathetic, intuitive and sensitive support and ‘companionship’.

      Observation that the nature of midwifery practice changes in an environment in which the midwife is engaged in being ‘with woman’ rather than doing, concurs with Brown's (2012) findings of watching and waiting and not just doing. Leap's publication in 2000 remains at the centre of this midwifery philosophy and was perceptive in suggesting that midwives give when they do less (Leap 2000). A key element of ensuring midwives and healthcare professionals are ‘with woman’ in their daily contact with childbearing women is well‐developed communication skills. In this respect, Gibbons (2010) suggests that communication goes beyond just words into the environment which is created in order to encourage comfort and privacy and promote unspoken dialogue. Positive first impressions created by midwives influence the quality of rapport and the relationship that is grown between woman and midwife (NHS England 2016). Raynor and England (2010) suggest that attitudes of acceptance and warmth, sharing a genuineness of transparent thoughts and feelings demonstrated in empathetic understanding by the midwife placing herself in the woman's position, are a humanistic approach to therapeutic verbal and non‐verbal communication.

      One aspect which develops skills and knowledge essential to the ‘with woman’ competence is the reflective process: both internal as a reflective process and shared through discussion or story‐telling. Johns and Freshwater's (1998) interpretation of reflection, although now dated, is still relevant in that practitioners' experience informs embodied knowledge translated into clinical decisions to become intuitive knowledge. The relationship between a midwife's practice experiences and self‐development through reflection transforms perceptions and beliefs and ultimately results in skilled empathetic midwifery practice and competence. One paper from Australia explores the issues surrounding the situation when a woman declines recommended care (Jenkinson et al. 2017). The authors examine, from a feminist perspective, how the woman's and the midwife's autonomy may be upheld with specific guidance from clinicians providing care in this situation and suggest that models of care which support reflexive practice may enable midwives to advocate the right of refusal and maintain the ‘with woman’ concept empathetically.

      Rodgers's framework (1989) suggests that related concepts exist as part of a network of concepts that provide significance to the concept of interest. In the analysis, related concepts were identified related to the continuity of carer, the ritual companion and the ‘good’ midwife in examining the literature. The impact of the continuity of carer concept suggests attributes of confidence to offer choices of sound judgement by midwives in their relationship ‘with woman’. The consequences are respect for ‘women’ autonomy, empowerment to make the right decisions, fulfilling women's expectations and preserving