Better Births. Anna Brown

Читать онлайн.
Название Better Births
Автор произведения Anna Brown
Жанр Медицина
Серия
Издательство Медицина
Год выпуска 0
isbn 9781119628842



Скачать книгу

compassion and incredibly professional’. This presence encouraged a self‐belief in the women, affirming that their own bodies can birth naturally. This is wonderfully reaffirmed by Victoria's friend when she messaged, ‘My job is simply to relax and allow my body to birth my baby’. Victoria acknowledged the midwives' intuition in getting ready for the birth and states, ‘they were right’. They remained patient and calm, giving of self through a balance of engagement with Victoria but affording her therapeutic space when needed, ‘and completely left me alone’. These attributes and consequences of being ‘with woman’ are clearly identified through Rodgers' Concept Analysis of the literature, but the stories above, speak for themselves.

      1 Allison, J. (2016). Midwives of sixteenth‐century rural East Anglia. Rural History 27 (1): 1–19.

      2 Amir, Z. and Reid, A.J. (2018). The cost of being “with women”: the impact of traumatic perinatal events on burnout rates amongst midwives. MIDIRS Midwifery Digest 28 (3): 307–308.

      3 Andrews, N. (2017). Holding space: with women in a labyrinth. Midwifery 121: 9–11.

      4 Astrup, J. (2016). In safe hands. Midwives 20 (2): 46–51.

      5 Aune, I., Amundsen, H., and Akaget Aas, L. (2014). Is a midwife's continuous presence during childbirth a matter of course? Midwives' experiences and thoughts about factors that may influence their continuous support of women during labour. Midwifery 30: 89–95.

      6 BenZion, M. (2018). Learning to trust birth though continuity of care. Midwifery 125: 18–22.

      7  Bradfield, Z., Duggan, R., Hauck, Y. et al. (2018a). Midwives being “with woman”: an integrative review. Women and Birth 31: 143–152.

      8 Bradfield, Z., Kelly, M., Hauck, Y., and Duggan, R. (2018b). Midwives “with woman” in the private obstetric model: where divergent philosophies meet. Women and Birth https://doi.org/10.1016/j.wombi.2018.07.013.

      9 Bradfield, Z., Hauck, Y., Kelly, M., and Duggan, R. (2019a). Midwives' experiences of being “with woman” in a model where midwives are unknown. Midwifery 69: 150–157.

      10 Bradfield, Z., Hauck, Y., Duggan, R. et al. (2019b). Midwives' perception of being “with woman”: a phenomenological study. BMC Pregnancy and Childbirth 19: 363. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12884‐019‐2548‐4.

      11 Bradfield, Z., Hauck, Y., Kelly, M. et al. (2019c). “It's what midwifery is about”: Western Australian midwives' experiences of being “with woman” during labour and birth in the known midwife model. BMC Pregnancy and Childbirth 19: 29. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12884‐018‐2144‐z4.

      12 Brady, S., Lee, N., Gibbons, K., and Bogossian, F. (2019). Women‐centred care: an integrative review of the empirical literature. International Journal of Nursing Studies 94: 107–119.

      13 Burgess, A. (2014). An evolutionary concept analysis. International Journal of Childbirth Education 29 (2): 64–72.

      14 Dahlberg, U. and Aune, I. (2013). The woman's birth experience‐ the effects of interpersonal relationship of continuity of care. Midwifery 29 (4): 407–415.

      15 Davis, D.L. and Homer, C.S. (2016). Birthplace as the midwife's work place: how does place of birth impact on midwives? Women & Birth 29: 407–415.

      16 Dolin, J. (2017). Thinking about the influences of informed choice. Midwifery 124: 50–51.

      17 Evenden, E. (2000). The Midwives of Seventeenth‐Century London. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

      18 Foster, J. (2017). Using research to advance nursing practice: A guide to concept analysis. Clinical Nurse Specialist 31 (2): 70–73.

      19 Harley, D. (1990). Historians as demonologists: the myth of the midwife‐ witch. Social History of Medicine 3 (1): 1–26.

      20 Harley, D. (1993). Provincial midwives in England: Lancashire and Cheshire, 1660 – 1760. In: The Art of Midwifery: Early Modern Midwives in Europe (ed. H. Marland), 27–48. London/New York: Routledge.

      21 Higgins, T., Larson, E., and Schnall, R. (2017). Unravelling the meaning of patient engagement: a concept analysis. Patient Education and Counselling 100: 30–36.

      22 Huber, U.S. and Sandall, J. (2009). A qualitative exploration of the creation of calm in a continuity of carer model of maternity care in London. Midwifery 25: 613–621.

      23 Hunter, L.P. (2002). Being with woman: a guiding concept for the care of labouring women. Journal of Obstetric, Gynecologic, & Neonatal Nursing 31: 650–657.

      24 Hunter, P. (2009). A descriptive study of “Being with Woman” during labour and birth. Journal of Midwifery & Women's Health 54 (2): 111–118.

      25  Hunter, L. (2015). Being with woman: claiming midwifery space. Practising Midwife 18 (3): 20–22.

      26 Hunter, L., Snow, S., and Warriner, S. (2017). Being there and reconnecting: Midwives' perceptions of the impact of mindfulness training on their practice. Journal of Clinical Nursing 27: 1227–1238.

      27 Knapp, R. (2017a). Wellbeing and resilience 1. The resilient midwife. Practising Midwife 20 (3): 26–28.

      28 Knapp, R. (2017b). The resilient midwife 2: The self‐compassionate midwife. Practising Midwife 20 (5): ePub.

      29 Leap, N. (2009). Woman‐centred or women‐centred care: does it matter? Midwifery 17 (1): 12–16.

      30 Leap, N. and Hunter, B. (1993). The Midwife's Tale: An Oral History from Handy Woman to Professional Midwife. London: Scarlet Press.

      31 Leinweber, J. and Rowe, H.J. (2010). The cost of “being with woman”: secondary traumatic stress in midwifery. Midwifery 26: 76–87.

      32 Llewelyn Davies, M. (ed.) (1915, reprinted 1978). Maternity: Letters from Working Women Collected by the Women's co‐Operative Guild. London: Virago.

      33 Marland, H. (ed.) (1993). The Art of Midwifery: Early Modern Midwives in Europe. London/New York: Routledge.

      34 McDonald, S. (2011). Women who receive continuous support during labour have reduced risk of caesarean, instrumental delivery or need for analgesia compared to usual care: systematic review. Midwifery 16 (2): 40–41.

      35 McIntosh, T. (2012). A Social History of Maternity and Childbirth: Key Themes in Maternity Care. London/New York: Routledge.

      36 Menage, D., Bailey, E., Lees, S., and Coad, J. (2017). A concept analysis of compassionate midwifery. Journal of Advanced Nursing 73 (3): 558–573.

      37 Myles, M. (1953). A Textbook for Midwives. Edinburgh: E & S Livingstone Ltd.

      38 Nursing & Midwifery Council (2019). Standards of proficiency for midwives. www.nmc.org.uk/globalassets/sitedocuments/standards/standards‐of‐proficiency‐for‐midwives.pdf (accessed 10 January 2020).

      39 Nystedt, A., Kristiansen, L., Ehrenstrale, K. et al. (2014). Exploring some Swedish women's experiences of support during childbirth. International Journal of Childbirth 4 (3): 183. https://doi.org/10.1891/2156‐5287.4.3.183.

      40 Perriman, N., Davis, D.L., and Ferguson, S. (2018). What women value in the midwifery continuity of care model: a systematic review with meta‐synthesis. Midwifery 62: 220–229.

      41 Power, A., Davidson, S., and Patrick, K. (2016). Being “with woman” in contemporary midwifery practice: one Trust's response to the Francis report. British Journal of Midwifery 24 (10): 711–713.

      42 Reed, R., Rowe, J., and Barnes, M. (2016). Midwifery practice during birth: ritual companionship. Women and Birth 29: 269–278.

      43