Integration of Cloud Computing with Internet of Things. Группа авторов

of Fog registering builds the general system adaptability and accessibility. The top layer is the cloud layer that is spoken to by the remote cloud unit. The IoT cloud underpins distinctive IoT administrations and conventions.

      Figure 3.5 Fog layered model.

3.5 Performance Analysis

The proposed FBELPM model for handling IoT devices is implemented in JAVA. The proposed model utilizes strong security mechanisms for successful data transmission. The proposed model is compared with the traditional Trust Based Detection (TBD) method and the results exhibit that the proposed model exhibits better performance in terms of security and data transmission. The time levels for grouping IoT devices are depicted in Figure.

The computational time levels for data processing in Fog model is less when compared to the traditional Secured Data Aggregation (SDA) model. The time levels for IoT group establishment in proposed and traditional models are depicted in Figure 3.6. The time for processing the data shared among the group is less as the authorization method verifies the users sharing the data are genuine or not. The computational time levels are depicted in Figure 3.7.

      Figure 3.6 Time levels for IoT group establishment.

      Figure 3.7 Computational time levels for data processing.

      The process of identification of malicious activities among the IoT devices is a challenging task. Because of malicious actions, the data in the group will be lost or modified to cause ambiguity in the group. The detection rate of malicious nodes in the proposed model is high when compared to the traditional methods. The malicious node detection rate is depicted in Figure 3.8.

      The Fog computational Secured data storage levels are depicted that indicates that the proposed model takes less time to store the data after computational process. The data storage in cloud should undergo a strong verification process to avoid data loss and also to complete the computational process. The fog computational security levels for data storage is depicted in Figure 3.9

      Figure 3.8 Malicious node detection rate.

      Figure 3.9 Fog computational security levels for data storage.

3.6 Conclusion

Fog computing is viewed because the most reasonable edge computing stage for IoT systems and applications. As it had been primary declared by Cisco as a kind of edge computing and an expansion of the cell edge computing, explores and examines are created to interrupt down, characterize, improve and incorporate Fog computing. Numerous works that consider Fog computing for IoT are directed; either without the arrangement of SDN innovation or with SDN. Joining the online of things and fog computing, this paper proposed an IoT-based fog computing model and depicted the model in layers. We talked about the elevated level engineering of Fog computing and its advantages for the plan and advancement of IoT applications. Since IoT applications are profoundly powerful in nature and include a lot of observing and investigation exercises, we have thought that it was useful to design these applications by utilizing a few ideas and models from the self-versatile and autonomic frameworks. As an underlying advance to address this issue, in the proposed work, a fog based model for Secured applications and shows the useful importance and centrality of such a structure. The relentless association of convenient and sensor devices is making another condition specifically the Internet of Things (IoT), which engages a wide extent of future Internet applications. In this work, an exceptional Fog Based raised level programming model for delicate applications that are geospatially flowed, colossal degree. The fog enlisting framework gives the model to administer IoT benefits in the fog prospect by techniques for an authentic demonstrating position.

      References

      1. Liu, J., Liu, F., Ansari, N., Monitoring and analyzing big traffic data of a large-scale cellular network with Hadoop. IEEE Netw., 28, 4, 32–39, 2014.

      2. Chiang, M. and Zhang, T., Fog and IoT: an overview of research opportunities. IEEE Internet Things J., 3, 60, 854–864, 2016.

      3. Lakshmi Patibandla, R.S.M., Kurra, S.S., Kim, H.-J., Electronic resource management using cloud computing for libraries. Int. J. Appl. Eng. Res., 9, 18141–18147, 2014.

      4. Bagula, A., Mandava, M., Bagula, H., A Framework for Supporting Healthcare in Rural and Isolated Areas. J. Netw. Commun. Appl., 120, 17–29, 2018. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jnca.2018.06.010

      5. Patibandla, R.S.M.L., Kurra, S.S., Mundukur, N.B., A Study on Scalability of Services and Privacy Issues in Cloud Computing, in: Cloud computing and Internet Technology, ICDCIT 2012. Lecture Notes in Computer Science, vol. 7154, R. Ramanujam and S. Ramaswamy (Eds.), Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg, 2012.

      6. Tarakeswara Rao, B., Patibandla, R.S.M.L., Murty, M.R., A Comparative Study on Effective Approaches for Unsupervised Statistical Machine Translation, in: Embedded Systems and Artificial Intelligence. Advances in Intelligent Systems and Computing, vol. 1076, V. Bhateja, S. Satapathy, H. Satori (Eds.), Springer, Singapore, 2020.

      7. Hosseinian-Far, A., Ramachandran, M., Slack, C.L., Emerging Trends in Cloud Computing, Big Data, Fog Computing, IoT and Smart Living, in: Technology for Smart Futures, pp. 29–40, Springer International Publishing, Cham, Switzerland, 2018.

      8. Cui, L., Yu, F.R., Yan, Q., When big data meets software-defined networking: SDN for big data and big data for SDN. IEEE Netw., 30, 58–65, 2016.

9. Ateya, A.A., Muthanna, A., Gudkova, I., Abuarqoub, A., Vybornova, A., Koucheryavy, A., Development of Intelligent Core Network for Tactile Internet and Future Smart Systems. J. Sens. Actuator Netw., 7, 1, 2018.

      10. Panarello, A., Tapas, N., Merlino, G., Longo, F., Puliafito, A., Blockchain and IoT Integration: A Systematic Survey. Sensors, 18, 2575, 2018.

      11. Banafa, A., IoT and Blockchain Convergence: Benefits and Challenges, in: IEEE Internet of Things, IEEE, Piscataway, NJ, USA, 2017.

      12. Peter, H. and Moser, A., Blockchain-Applications in Banking & Payment Transactions: Results of a Survey. Eur. Financial Syst., 2017, 141, 2017.

      13. Uddin, M., Mukherjee, S., Chang, H., Lakshman, T.V., SDN-based Multi-Protocol Edge Switching for IoT Service Automation. IEEE J. Sel. Areas Commun., 36, 2775–2786, 2018.

      14. Alliance, N.G.M.N. 5G White Paper; Next Generation Mobile Networks: Frankfurt, Germany, 2017.

      15. Ateya, A.A., Muthanna, A., Koucheryavy, A., 5G framework based on multi-level edge computing with D2D enabled communication, in: Proceedings of the 2018 IEEE 20th International Conference on Advanced Communication Technology (ICACT), Chuncheon-si Gangwon-do, Korea, 11–14 February 2018, pp. 507–512.

      16. Azimi, I., Anzanpour, A., Rahmani, A.M., Pahikkala, T., Levorato, M., Liljeberg, P., Dutt, N., HiCH: Hierarchical Fog-assisted computing architecture for healthcare IoT. ACM Trans. Embed. Comput. Syst., 16, 174, 2017.

      17. Borcoci, E., Ambarus, T., Vochin, M.,