NEW WORLDS FOR OLD. H. G. Wells

on>

       H. G. Wells

      NEW WORLDS FOR OLD

      A Plain Account of Modern Socialism

      Published by

      Books

      - Advanced Digital Solutions & High-Quality eBook Formatting -

       [email protected]

      2017 OK Publishing

      ISBN 978-80-272-3587-2

      Table of Contents

       INTRODUCTORY REMARKS

      I. — THE GOOD WILL IN MAN II. — THE FUNDAMENTAL IDEA OF SOCIALISM

      III. — THE FIRST MAIN GENERALIZATION OF SOCIALISM IV. — THE SECOND MAIN GENERALIZATION OF SOCIALISM

       V. — THE SPIRIT OF GAIN AND THE SPIRIT OF SERVICE

       VI. — WOULD SOCIALISM DESTROY THE HOME?

       VII. — WOULD MODERN SOCIALISM ABOLISH ALL PROPERTY?

       VIII. — THE MIDDLE-CLASS MAN, THE BUSINESS MAN, AND SOCIALISM

       IX. — SOME COMMON OBJECTIONS TO SOCIALISM

       X. — SOCIALISM—A DEVELOPING DOCTRINE

       XI. — REVOLUTIONARY SOCIALISM

       XII. — ADMINISTRATIVE SOCIALISM

       XIII. — CONSTRUCTIVE SOCIALISM

       XIV. — SOME ARGUMENTS AD HOMINEM

       XV. — THE ADVANCEMENT OF SOCIALISM

      INTRODUCTORY REMARKS

       Table of Contents

      “Undiluted Atheism, theft and immorality…. I know of no language sufficiently potent to express fully my absolute detestation of what I believe to be the most poisonous doctrine ever put forward, namely Socialism.” —His Grace the Duke of Rutland.

      “Let all parties then unite to defeat this insidious Socialism which is threatening the country, and take immediate steps to expose and bring it to light. The country may truly be said to be sleeping over a veritable volcano which the next general election may precipitate, unless steps are taken at once to bring this nightmare into the light of day and force it out of its creeping nocturnal habits.” —Mr. Dudley S.A. Cosby in the Westminster Review.

      “Many people think that it is possible to conduct a victorious campaign with the single watchword ‘Down with Socialism.’ Well, I am not fond of mere negatives. I do not like fighting an abstract noun. My objection to Anti-Socialism as a platform is that Socialism means so many different things. On this point I agree with Mr. Asquith. I will wait before I denounce Socialism till I see what form it takes… Socialism is not necessarily synonymous with robbery. Correctly used, the word only signifies a particular view of the proper relation of the State to its citizens, a tendency to substitute public for private ownership, or to restrict the freedom of individual enterprise in the interests of the public. But there are some forms of property which we all admit should be public and not private, and the freedom of individual enterprise is already limited by a hundred laws. Socialism and Individualism,—I am not fond of these abstract phrases. There are opposing principles which enter in various proportions into the constitution of every civilized society. It is merely a question of degree. One community is more Socialistic than another. The same community is more Socialistic at one time than at another. This country is far more Socialistic than it was fifty years ago, and for most of the changes in that direction the Unionist or Tory Party is responsible.”

      —Lord Milner.

      I. — THE GOOD WILL IN MAN

       Table of Contents

       § 1.

       § 2.

       § 3.

       § 4.

§ 1.

      The present writer has long been deeply interested in the Socialist movement in Great Britain and America, and in all those complicated issues one lumps together as “social questions.” In the last few years he has gone into it personally and studied the Socialist movement closely and intimately at first hand; he has made the acquaintance of many of its leaders upon both sides of the Atlantic, joined numerous organizations, attended and held meetings, experimented in Socialist politics. From these inquiries he has emerged with certain very definite conclusions as to the trend and needs of social development, and these he is now rendering in this book. He calls himself a Socialist, but he is by no means a fanatical or uncritical adherent. To him Socialism presents itself as a very noble but a very human and fallible system of ideas and motives, a system that grows and develops. He regards its spirit, its intimate substance as the most hopeful thing in human affairs at the present time, but he does also find it shares with all mundane concerns the qualities of inadequacy and error. It suffers from the common penalty of noble propositions; it is hampered by the insufficiency of its supporters and advocates, and by the superficial tarnish that necessarily falls in our atmosphere of greed and conflict darkest upon the brightest things. In spite of these admissions of failure and unworthiness in himself and those about him, he remains a Socialist.

      In discussing Socialism with very various sorts of people he has necessarily had, time after time, to encounter and frame a reply to a very simple seeming and a really very difficult question: “What is Socialism?” It is almost like asking “What is Christianity?” or demanding to be shown the atmosphere. It is not to be answered fully by a formula or an epigram. Again and again the writer has been asked for some book which would set out in untechnical language, frankly and straightforwardly, what Socialism is and what it is not, and always he has hesitated in his reply. Many good books there are upon this subject, clear and well written, but none that seem to tell