Interval Laboratory A Complete Guide - 2020 Edition. Gerardus Blokdyk

      <--- Score

      14. Do you have a Interval Laboratory success story or case study ready to tell and share?

      <--- Score

      15. Are the Interval Laboratory requirements complete?

      <--- Score

      16. What sort of initial information to gather?

      <--- Score

      17. What scope to assess?

      <--- Score

      18. Has everyone on the team, including the team leaders, been properly trained?

      <--- Score

      19. Have all basic functions of Interval Laboratory been defined?

      <--- Score

      20. The political context: who holds power?

      <--- Score

      21. How do you gather the stories?

      <--- Score

      22. What is the scope of Interval Laboratory?

      <--- Score

      23. Are there any constraints known that bear on the ability to perform Interval Laboratory work? How is the team addressing them?

      <--- Score

      24. What is the scope of the Interval Laboratory work?

      <--- Score

      25. What system do you use for gathering Interval Laboratory information?

      <--- Score

      26. How can the value of Interval Laboratory be defined?

      <--- Score

      27. Why are you doing Interval Laboratory and what is the scope?

      <--- Score

      28. Is it clearly defined in and to your organization what you do?

      <--- Score

      29. What defines best in class?

      <--- Score

      30. How did the Interval Laboratory manager receive input to the development of a Interval Laboratory improvement plan and the estimated completion dates/times of each activity?

      <--- Score

      31. Does the team have regular meetings?

      <--- Score

      32. Has a project plan, Gantt chart, or similar been developed/completed?

      <--- Score

      33. What is the scope?

      <--- Score

      34. How do you build the right business case?

      <--- Score

      35. Are all requirements met?

      <--- Score

      36. What are the Interval Laboratory tasks and definitions?

      <--- Score

      37. Is special Interval Laboratory user knowledge required?

      <--- Score

      38. Who defines (or who defined) the rules and roles?

      <--- Score

      39. Are task requirements clearly defined?

      <--- Score

      40. Is there regularly 100% attendance at the team meetings? If not, have appointed substitutes attended to preserve cross-functionality and full representation?

      <--- Score

      41. Are different versions of process maps needed to account for the different types of inputs?

      <--- Score

      42. What knowledge or experience is required?

      <--- Score

      43. Has the improvement team collected the ‘voice of the customer’ (obtained feedback – qualitative and quantitative)?

      <--- Score

      44. Are accountability and ownership for Interval Laboratory clearly defined?

      <--- Score

      45. What are the dynamics of the communication plan?

      <--- Score

      46. Who are the Interval Laboratory improvement team members, including Management Leads and Coaches?

      <--- Score

      47. Does the scope remain the same?

      <--- Score

      48. Is there a completed, verified, and validated high-level ‘as is’ (not ‘should be’ or ‘could be’) stakeholder process map?

      <--- Score

      49. How do you think the partners involved in Interval Laboratory would have defined success?

      <--- Score

      50. Is there any additional Interval Laboratory definition of success?

      <--- Score

      51. What is a worst-case scenario for losses?

      <--- Score

      52. How will the Interval Laboratory team and the group measure complete success of Interval Laboratory?

      <--- Score

      53. What Interval Laboratory services do you require?

      <--- Score

      54. How is the team tracking and documenting its work?

      <--- Score

      55. When are meeting minutes sent out? Who is on the distribution list?

      <--- Score

      56. What scope do you want your strategy to cover?

      <--- Score

      57. What is out of scope?

      <--- Score

      58. Has a high-level ‘as is’ process map been completed, verified and validated?

      <--- Score

      59. How do you gather requirements?

      <--- Score

      60. What Interval Laboratory requirements should be gathered?

      <--- Score

      61. Who is gathering Interval Laboratory information?

      <--- Score

      62. Is the improvement team aware of the different versions of a process: what they think it is vs. what it actually is vs. what it should be vs. what it could be?

      <--- Score

      63. What is out-of-scope initially?

      <--- Score

      64. What information do you gather?

      <--- Score

      65. What information should you gather?

      <--- Score

      66. What is the scope of the Interval Laboratory effort?

      <--- Score

      67. Is the work to date meeting requirements?

      <--- Score

      68. Is the Interval Laboratory scope complete and appropriately sized?

      <--- Score

      69. Is Interval Laboratory linked to key stakeholder goals and objectives?

      <--- Score

      70. How do you manage unclear Interval Laboratory requirements?