Information Loss A Complete Guide - 2020 Edition. Gerardus Blokdyk

Читать онлайн.
Название Information Loss A Complete Guide - 2020 Edition
Автор произведения Gerardus Blokdyk
Жанр Зарубежная деловая литература
Серия
Издательство Зарубежная деловая литература
Год выпуска 0
isbn 9781867458579



Скачать книгу

Score

      20. Is the team formed and are team leaders (Coaches and Management Leads) assigned?

      <--- Score

      21. Is Information loss required?

      <--- Score

      22. When is/was the Information loss start date?

      <--- Score

      23. When is the estimated completion date?

      <--- Score

      24. If substitutes have been appointed, have they been briefed on the Information loss goals and received regular communications as to the progress to date?

      <--- Score

      25. The political context: who holds power?

      <--- Score

      26. Have specific policy objectives been defined?

      <--- Score

      27. Has a Information loss requirement not been met?

      <--- Score

      28. What scope to assess?

      <--- Score

      29. How will variation in the actual durations of each activity be dealt with to ensure that the expected Information loss results are met?

      <--- Score

      30. Are resources adequate for the scope?

      <--- Score

      31. What Information loss requirements should be gathered?

      <--- Score

      32. Are stakeholder processes mapped?

      <--- Score

      33. What Information loss services do you require?

      <--- Score

      34. What are the dynamics of the communication plan?

      <--- Score

      35. What is out of scope?

      <--- Score

      36. Who are the Information loss improvement team members, including Management Leads and Coaches?

      <--- Score

      37. Who defines (or who defined) the rules and roles?

      <--- Score

      38. Will team members perform Information loss work when assigned and in a timely fashion?

      <--- Score

      39. How does the Information loss manager ensure against scope creep?

      <--- Score

      40. Is the improvement team aware of the different versions of a process: what they think it is vs. what it actually is vs. what it should be vs. what it could be?

      <--- Score

      41. Has anyone else (internal or external to the group) attempted to solve this problem or a similar one before? If so, what knowledge can be leveraged from these previous efforts?

      <--- Score

      42. What sources do you use to gather information for a Information loss study?

      <--- Score

      43. What are the Information loss tasks and definitions?

      <--- Score

      44. How will the Information loss team and the group measure complete success of Information loss?

      <--- Score

      45. Are required metrics defined, what are they?

      <--- Score

      46. Is data collected and displayed to better understand customer(s) critical needs and requirements.

      <--- Score

      47. What are the Roles and Responsibilities for each team member and its leadership? Where is this documented?

      <--- Score

      48. Are customer(s) identified and segmented according to their different needs and requirements?

      <--- Score

      49. How would you define the culture at your organization, how susceptible is it to Information loss changes?

      <--- Score

      50. Is the work to date meeting requirements?

      <--- Score

      51. Is Information loss linked to key stakeholder goals and objectives?

      <--- Score

      52. How do you catch Information loss definition inconsistencies?

      <--- Score

      53. Is the Information loss scope manageable?

      <--- Score

      54. Has a team charter been developed and communicated?

      <--- Score

      55. Has the direction changed at all during the course of Information loss? If so, when did it change and why?

      <--- Score

      56. Is full participation by members in regularly held team meetings guaranteed?

      <--- Score

      57. Will team members regularly document their Information loss work?

      <--- Score

      58. How have you defined all Information loss requirements first?

      <--- Score

      59. Has a high-level ‘as is’ process map been completed, verified and validated?

      <--- Score

      60. How can the value of Information loss be defined?

      <--- Score

      61. How and when will the baselines be defined?

      <--- Score

      62. How do you gather requirements?

      <--- Score

      63. How do you gather the stories?

      <--- Score

      64. Is it clearly defined in and to your organization what you do?

      <--- Score

      65. Who is gathering information?

      <--- Score

      66. What knowledge or experience is required?

      <--- Score

      67. What are the rough order estimates on cost savings/opportunities that Information loss brings?

      <--- Score

      68. How are consistent Information loss definitions important?

      <--- Score

      69. Is Information loss currently on schedule according to the plan?

      <--- Score

      70. Are all requirements met?

      <--- Score

      71. How did the Information loss manager receive input to the development of a Information loss improvement plan and the estimated completion dates/times of each activity?

      <--- Score

      72. How often are the team meetings?

      <--- Score

      73. Are accountability and ownership for Information loss clearly defined?

      <--- Score

      74. Has a project plan, Gantt chart, or similar been developed/completed?

      <--- Score

      75. What is