Systems Architecture Service A Complete Guide - 2020 Edition. Gerardus Blokdyk

      <--- Score

      114. What scope to assess?

      <--- Score

      115. What are the Systems Architecture Service tasks and definitions?

      <--- Score

      116. Is the improvement team aware of the different versions of a process: what they think it is vs. what it actually is vs. what it should be vs. what it could be?

      <--- Score

      117. Is the Systems Architecture Service scope complete and appropriately sized?

      <--- Score

      118. When are meeting minutes sent out? Who is on the distribution list?

      <--- Score

      119. What are the record-keeping requirements of Systems Architecture Service activities?

      <--- Score

      120. Do you have organizational privacy requirements?

      <--- Score

      121. Who is gathering Systems Architecture Service information?

      <--- Score

      122. What information should you gather?

      <--- Score

      123. What are the Roles and Responsibilities for each team member and its leadership? Where is this documented?

      <--- Score

      124. How do you gather requirements?

      <--- Score

      125. Has everyone on the team, including the team leaders, been properly trained?

      <--- Score

      126. What are (control) requirements for Systems Architecture Service Information?

      <--- Score

      127. Has anyone else (internal or external to the group) attempted to solve this problem or a similar one before? If so, what knowledge can be leveraged from these previous efforts?

      <--- Score

      128. Has a Systems Architecture Service requirement not been met?

      <--- Score

      129. What is the definition of Systems Architecture Service excellence?

      <--- Score

      130. What knowledge or experience is required?

      <--- Score

      131. Is there a critical path to deliver Systems Architecture Service results?

      <--- Score

      132. Are different versions of process maps needed to account for the different types of inputs?

      <--- Score

      133. Do the problem and goal statements meet the SMART criteria (specific, measurable, attainable, relevant, and time-bound)?

      <--- Score

      134. What is in scope?

      <--- Score

      135. The political context: who holds power?

      <--- Score

      136. What key stakeholder process output measure(s) does Systems Architecture Service leverage and how?

      <--- Score

      Add up total points for this section: _____ = Total points for this section

      Divided by: ______ (number of statements answered) = ______ Average score for this section

      Transfer your score to the Systems Architecture Service Index at the beginning of the Self-Assessment.

      CRITERION #3: MEASURE:

      INTENT: Gather the correct data. Measure the current performance and evolution of the situation.

      In my belief, the answer to this question is clearly defined:

      5 Strongly Agree

      4 Agree

      3 Neutral

      2 Disagree

      1 Strongly Disagree

      1. How are costs allocated?

      <--- Score

      2. Has a cost center been established?

      <--- Score

      3. Do the benefits outweigh the costs?

      <--- Score

      4. How do you verify and develop ideas and innovations?

      <--- Score

      5. Is the solution cost-effective?

      <--- Score

      6. How do you prevent mis-estimating cost?

      <--- Score

      7. How do you stay flexible and focused to recognize larger Systems Architecture Service results?

      <--- Score

      8. What causes investor action?

      <--- Score

      9. How sensitive must the Systems Architecture Service strategy be to cost?

      <--- Score

      10. What causes innovation to fail or succeed in your organization?

      <--- Score

      11. Is the cost worth the Systems Architecture Service effort ?

      <--- Score

      12. Are actual costs in line with budgeted costs?

      <--- Score

      13. How do you verify and validate the Systems Architecture Service data?

      <--- Score

      14. How do you verify the Systems Architecture Service requirements quality?

      <--- Score

      15. How do you control the overall costs of your work processes?

      <--- Score

      16. Are the Systems Architecture Service benefits worth its costs?

      <--- Score

      17. Which measures and indicators matter?

      <--- Score

      18. At what cost?

      <--- Score

      19. What does verifying compliance entail?

      <--- Score

      20. Do you verify that corrective actions were taken?

      <--- Score

      21. Is it possible to estimate the impact of unanticipated complexity such as wrong or failed assumptions, feedback, etcetera on proposed reforms?

      <--- Score

      22. Are there any easy-to-implement alternatives to Systems Architecture Service? Sometimes other solutions are available that do not require the cost implications of a full-blown project?

      <--- Score

      23. What is your Systems Architecture Service quality cost segregation study?

      <--- Score

      24. How do you quantify and qualify impacts?

      <--- Score

      25. How frequently do you track Systems Architecture Service measures?

      <--- Score

      26. How will effects be measured?

      <--- Score

      27. Does the Systems Architecture Service task fit the client’s priorities?

      <---