Information Systems Analysis And Design A Complete Guide - 2020 Edition. Gerardus Blokdyk

for this section

      Divided by: ______ (number of statements answered) = ______ Average score for this section

      Transfer your score to the Information systems analysis and design Index at the beginning of the Self-Assessment.

      CRITERION #2: DEFINE:

      INTENT: Formulate the stakeholder problem. Define the problem, needs and objectives.

      In my belief, the answer to this question is clearly defined:

      5 Strongly Agree

      4 Agree

      3 Neutral

      2 Disagree

      1 Strongly Disagree

      1. What scope to assess?

      <--- Score

      2. Has/have the customer(s) been identified?

      <--- Score

      3. Is the work to date meeting requirements?

      <--- Score

      4. Is data collected and displayed to better understand customer(s) critical needs and requirements.

      <--- Score

      5. Do the problem and goal statements meet the SMART criteria (specific, measurable, attainable, relevant, and time-bound)?

      <--- Score

      6. Is it clearly defined in and to your organization what you do?

      <--- Score

      7. How was the ‘as is’ process map developed, reviewed, verified and validated?

      <--- Score

      8. Are task requirements clearly defined?

      <--- Score

      9. What is the scope of the Information systems analysis and design effort?

      <--- Score

      10. Is there a completed, verified, and validated high-level ‘as is’ (not ‘should be’ or ‘could be’) stakeholder process map?

      <--- Score

      11. Have all of the relationships been defined properly?

      <--- Score

      12. What are the rough order estimates on cost savings/opportunities that Information systems analysis and design brings?

      <--- Score

      13. What are the tasks and definitions?

      <--- Score

      14. What are the compelling stakeholder reasons for embarking on Information systems analysis and design?

      <--- Score

      15. What sort of initial information to gather?

      <--- Score

      16. What is the context?

      <--- Score

      17. What is the scope?

      <--- Score

      18. What information should you gather?

      <--- Score

      19. Does the team have regular meetings?

      <--- Score

      20. What is the scope of Information systems analysis and design?

      <--- Score

      21. Is the Information systems analysis and design scope complete and appropriately sized?

      <--- Score

      22. Are all requirements met?

      <--- Score

      23. Has a project plan, Gantt chart, or similar been developed/completed?

      <--- Score

      24. What are the Information systems analysis and design use cases?

      <--- Score

      25. What are (control) requirements for Information systems analysis and design Information?

      <--- Score

      26. Has the direction changed at all during the course of Information systems analysis and design? If so, when did it change and why?

      <--- Score

      27. Has a team charter been developed and communicated?

      <--- Score

      28. Is there a completed SIPOC representation, describing the Suppliers, Inputs, Process, Outputs, and Customers?

      <--- Score

      29. What Information systems analysis and design services do you require?

      <--- Score

      30. Have all basic functions of Information systems analysis and design been defined?

      <--- Score

      31. What Information systems analysis and design requirements should be gathered?

      <--- Score

      32. Will a Information systems analysis and design production readiness review be required?

      <--- Score

      33. What happens if Information systems analysis and design’s scope changes?

      <--- Score

      34. How and when will the baselines be defined?

      <--- Score

      35. What is a worst-case scenario for losses?

      <--- Score

      36. How do you manage unclear Information systems analysis and design requirements?

      <--- Score

      37. Is the current ‘as is’ process being followed? If not, what are the discrepancies?

      <--- Score

      38. Are the Information systems analysis and design requirements testable?

      <--- Score

      39. Have specific policy objectives been defined?

      <--- Score

      40. What is out-of-scope initially?

      <--- Score

      41. What are the dynamics of the communication plan?

      <--- Score

      42. Are there any constraints known that bear on the ability to perform Information systems analysis and design work? How is the team addressing them?

      <--- Score

      43. What is the worst case scenario?

      <--- Score

      44. What system do you use for gathering Information systems analysis and design information?

      <--- Score

      45. Do you all define Information systems analysis and design in the same way?

      <--- Score

      46. Who are the Information systems analysis and design improvement team members, including Management Leads and Coaches?

      <--- Score

      47. Scope of sensitive information?

      <--- Score

      48. Has anyone else (internal or external to the group) attempted to solve this problem or a similar one before? If so, what knowledge can be leveraged from these previous efforts?

      <--- Score

      49. Is there regularly 100% attendance at the team meetings? If not, have appointed substitutes attended to preserve cross-functionality and full representation?

      <--- Score