Network Transparency A Complete Guide - 2020 Edition. Gerardus Blokdyk

      70. If substitutes have been appointed, have they been briefed on the Network transparency goals and received regular communications as to the progress to date?

      <--- Score

      71. What constraints exist that might impact the team?

      <--- Score

      72. What key stakeholder process output measure(s) does Network transparency leverage and how?

      <--- Score

      73. Is there a critical path to deliver Network transparency results?

      <--- Score

      74. What sort of initial information to gather?

      <--- Score

      75. When is/was the Network transparency start date?

      <--- Score

      76. Does the team have regular meetings?

      <--- Score

      77. What would be the goal or target for a Network transparency’s improvement team?

      <--- Score

      78. Are approval levels defined for contracts and supplements to contracts?

      <--- Score

      79. Who defines (or who defined) the rules and roles?

      <--- Score

      80. What specifically is the problem? Where does it occur? When does it occur? What is its extent?

      <--- Score

      81. Who are the Network transparency improvement team members, including Management Leads and Coaches?

      <--- Score

      82. What is the worst case scenario?

      <--- Score

      83. How do you gather Network transparency requirements?

      <--- Score

      84. Has a team charter been developed and communicated?

      <--- Score

      85. Is Network transparency currently on schedule according to the plan?

      <--- Score

      86. How do you build the right business case?

      <--- Score

      87. Is it clearly defined in and to your organization what you do?

      <--- Score

      88. Is the scope of Network transparency defined?

      <--- Score

      89. How was the ‘as is’ process map developed, reviewed, verified and validated?

      <--- Score

      90. Is the work to date meeting requirements?

      <--- Score

      91. What are the core elements of the Network transparency business case?

      <--- Score

      92. What gets examined?

      <--- Score

      93. When are meeting minutes sent out? Who is on the distribution list?

      <--- Score

      94. Is the improvement team aware of the different versions of a process: what they think it is vs. what it actually is vs. what it should be vs. what it could be?

      <--- Score

      95. Are different versions of process maps needed to account for the different types of inputs?

      <--- Score

      96. What Network transparency requirements should be gathered?

      <--- Score

      97. Has a project plan, Gantt chart, or similar been developed/completed?

      <--- Score

      98. What happens if Network transparency’s scope changes?

      <--- Score

      99. Who is gathering Network transparency information?

      <--- Score

      100. Do you have organizational privacy requirements?

      <--- Score

      101. Is there a Network transparency management charter, including stakeholder case, problem and goal statements, scope, milestones, roles and responsibilities, communication plan?

      <--- Score

      102. Are roles and responsibilities formally defined?

      <--- Score

      103. Does the scope remain the same?

      <--- Score

      104. Why are you doing Network transparency and what is the scope?

      <--- Score

      105. In what way can you redefine the criteria of choice clients have in your category in your favor?

      <--- Score

      106. How would you define the culture at your organization, how susceptible is it to Network transparency changes?

      <--- Score

      107. Is the Network transparency scope manageable?

      <--- Score

      108. Has anyone else (internal or external to the group) attempted to solve this problem or a similar one before? If so, what knowledge can be leveraged from these previous efforts?

      <--- Score

      109. Do the problem and goal statements meet the SMART criteria (specific, measurable, attainable, relevant, and time-bound)?

      <--- Score

      110. What scope do you want your strategy to cover?

      <--- Score

      111. Is the current ‘as is’ process being followed? If not, what are the discrepancies?

      <--- Score

      112. What sources do you use to gather information for a Network transparency study?

      <--- Score

      113. Are required metrics defined, what are they?

      <--- Score

      114. Is the Network transparency scope complete and appropriately sized?

      <--- Score

      115. Will a Network transparency production readiness review be required?

      <--- Score

      116. What intelligence can you gather?

      <--- Score

      117. Do you have a Network transparency success story or case study ready to tell and share?

      <--- Score

      118. Has a Network transparency requirement not been met?

      <--- Score

      119. What is the scope of Network transparency?

      <--- Score

      120. What is the context?

      <--- Score

      121. Scope of sensitive information?

      <--- Score

      122. How often are the team meetings?

      <--- Score

      123. What baselines are required to be defined and managed?

      <--- Score

      124. When is the estimated completion date?

      <--- Score

      125. Are the Network transparency