Transparent Context A Complete Guide - 2020 Edition. Gerardus Blokdyk

How do you gather Transparent context requirements?

      <--- Score

      65. Are the Transparent context requirements complete?

      <--- Score

      66. What is a worst-case scenario for losses?

      <--- Score

      67. How does the Transparent context manager ensure against scope creep?

      <--- Score

      68. Is the work to date meeting requirements?

      <--- Score

      69. How do you think the partners involved in Transparent context would have defined success?

      <--- Score

      70. How will variation in the actual durations of each activity be dealt with to ensure that the expected Transparent context results are met?

      <--- Score

      71. What are the rough order estimates on cost savings/opportunities that Transparent context brings?

      <--- Score

      72. What critical content must be communicated – who, what, when, where, and how?

      <--- Score

      73. Has/have the customer(s) been identified?

      <--- Score

      74. What information do you gather?

      <--- Score

      75. Have specific policy objectives been defined?

      <--- Score

      76. Is it clearly defined in and to your organization what you do?

      <--- Score

      77. Has a Transparent context requirement not been met?

      <--- Score

      78. How and when will the baselines be defined?

      <--- Score

      79. How are consistent Transparent context definitions important?

      <--- Score

      80. What are the dynamics of the communication plan?

      <--- Score

      81. Is the Transparent context scope complete and appropriately sized?

      <--- Score

      82. How have you defined all Transparent context requirements first?

      <--- Score

      83. Why are you doing Transparent context and what is the scope?

      <--- Score

      84. How did the Transparent context manager receive input to the development of a Transparent context improvement plan and the estimated completion dates/times of each activity?

      <--- Score

      85. Is the improvement team aware of the different versions of a process: what they think it is vs. what it actually is vs. what it should be vs. what it could be?

      <--- Score

      86. Are there any constraints known that bear on the ability to perform Transparent context work? How is the team addressing them?

      <--- Score

      87. How often are the team meetings?

      <--- Score

      88. How is the team tracking and documenting its work?

      <--- Score

      89. Will a Transparent context production readiness review be required?

      <--- Score

      90. Is data collected and displayed to better understand customer(s) critical needs and requirements.

      <--- Score

      91. What is the context?

      <--- Score

      92. Scope of sensitive information?

      <--- Score

      93. What defines best in class?

      <--- Score

      94. Has a team charter been developed and communicated?

      <--- Score

      95. How was the ‘as is’ process map developed, reviewed, verified and validated?

      <--- Score

      96. Is the team formed and are team leaders (Coaches and Management Leads) assigned?

      <--- Score

      97. Who is gathering information?

      <--- Score

      98. Has the Transparent context work been fairly and/or equitably divided and delegated among team members who are qualified and capable to perform the work? Has everyone contributed?

      <--- Score

      99. When is the estimated completion date?

      <--- Score

      100. Is Transparent context linked to key stakeholder goals and objectives?

      <--- Score

      101. What is the scope of Transparent context?

      <--- Score

      102. What information should you gather?

      <--- Score

      103. How would you define the culture at your organization, how susceptible is it to Transparent context changes?

      <--- Score

      104. Who are the Transparent context improvement team members, including Management Leads and Coaches?

      <--- Score

      105. What intelligence can you gather?

      <--- Score

      106. Is there a completed SIPOC representation, describing the Suppliers, Inputs, Process, Outputs, and Customers?

      <--- Score

      107. Is the team adequately staffed with the desired cross-functionality? If not, what additional resources are available to the team?

      <--- Score

      108. Are different versions of process maps needed to account for the different types of inputs?

      <--- Score

      109. What is the scope of the Transparent context effort?

      <--- Score

      110. What is the definition of success?

      <--- Score

      111. Where can you gather more information?

      <--- Score

      112. How do you hand over Transparent context context?

      <--- Score

      113. Is the current ‘as is’ process being followed? If not, what are the discrepancies?

      <--- Score

      114. Are required metrics defined, what are they?

      <--- Score

      115. Is there regularly 100% attendance at the team meetings? If not, have appointed substitutes attended to preserve cross-functionality and full representation?

      <--- Score

      116. Are customer(s) identified and segmented according to their different needs and requirements?

      <--- Score

      117. Are audit criteria, scope, frequency and methods defined?

      <--- Score

      118. What system do you use for gathering Transparent context