Software Reliability Testing A Complete Guide - 2020 Edition. Gerardus Blokdyk

when, where, and how?

      <--- Score

      66. What scope do you want your strategy to cover?

      <--- Score

      67. What is the scope of Software reliability testing?

      <--- Score

      68. Are approval levels defined for contracts and supplements to contracts?

      <--- Score

      69. Is there regularly 100% attendance at the team meetings? If not, have appointed substitutes attended to preserve cross-functionality and full representation?

      <--- Score

      70. What Software reliability testing services do you require?

      <--- Score

      71. What is out of scope?

      <--- Score

      72. How do you manage scope?

      <--- Score

      73. What baselines are required to be defined and managed?

      <--- Score

      74. How do you manage unclear Software reliability testing requirements?

      <--- Score

      75. How do you gather the stories?

      <--- Score

      76. Will a Software reliability testing production readiness review be required?

      <--- Score

      77. How would you define Software reliability testing leadership?

      <--- Score

      78. Has a Software reliability testing requirement not been met?

      <--- Score

      79. Do you all define Software reliability testing in the same way?

      <--- Score

      80. Are customer(s) identified and segmented according to their different needs and requirements?

      <--- Score

      81. What gets examined?

      <--- Score

      82. Are there any constraints known that bear on the ability to perform Software reliability testing work? How is the team addressing them?

      <--- Score

      83. Are audit criteria, scope, frequency and methods defined?

      <--- Score

      84. How do you gather Software reliability testing requirements?

      <--- Score

      85. Has/have the customer(s) been identified?

      <--- Score

      86. Is the scope of Software reliability testing defined?

      <--- Score

      87. What is the worst case scenario?

      <--- Score

      88. How do you build the right business case?

      <--- Score

      89. Is there a completed, verified, and validated high-level ‘as is’ (not ‘should be’ or ‘could be’) stakeholder process map?

      <--- Score

      90. What happens if Software reliability testing’s scope changes?

      <--- Score

      91. Has the Software reliability testing work been fairly and/or equitably divided and delegated among team members who are qualified and capable to perform the work? Has everyone contributed?

      <--- Score

      92. Is Software reliability testing required?

      <--- Score

      93. What sources do you use to gather information for a Software reliability testing study?

      <--- Score

      94. What are the core elements of the Software reliability testing business case?

      <--- Score

      95. What constraints exist that might impact the team?

      <--- Score

      96. Is there a completed SIPOC representation, describing the Suppliers, Inputs, Process, Outputs, and Customers?

      <--- Score

      97. Has the direction changed at all during the course of Software reliability testing? If so, when did it change and why?

      <--- Score

      98. Where can you gather more information?

      <--- Score

      99. In what way can you redefine the criteria of choice clients have in your category in your favor?

      <--- Score

      100. Is Software reliability testing linked to key stakeholder goals and objectives?

      <--- Score

      101. Has a high-level ‘as is’ process map been completed, verified and validated?

      <--- Score

      102. Is it clearly defined in and to your organization what you do?

      <--- Score

      103. What Software reliability testing requirements should be gathered?

      <--- Score

      104. What knowledge or experience is required?

      <--- Score

      105. Scope of sensitive information?

      <--- Score

      106. Who are the Software reliability testing improvement team members, including Management Leads and Coaches?

      <--- Score

      107. How will variation in the actual durations of each activity be dealt with to ensure that the expected Software reliability testing results are met?

      <--- Score

      108. If substitutes have been appointed, have they been briefed on the Software reliability testing goals and received regular communications as to the progress to date?

      <--- Score

      109. Who approved the Software reliability testing scope?

      <--- Score

      110. Have all of the relationships been defined properly?

      <--- Score

      111. Who is gathering Software reliability testing information?

      <--- Score

      112. What are the record-keeping requirements of Software reliability testing activities?

      <--- Score

      113. Have specific policy objectives been defined?

      <--- Score

      114. Do you have a Software reliability testing success story or case study ready to tell and share?

      <--- Score

      115. Is there any additional Software reliability testing definition of success?

      <--- Score

      116. What specifically is the problem? Where does it occur? When does it occur? What is its extent?

      <--- Score

      117. Has a team charter been developed and communicated?

      <--- Score

      118. Has everyone on the team, including the team leaders, been properly trained?

      <--- Score

      119. What are