Design Engineering And Construction Services A Complete Guide - 2020 Edition. Gerardus Blokdyk

Score

      102. How does the Design Engineering and Construction Services manager ensure against scope creep?

      <--- Score

      103. Is there regularly 100% attendance at the team meetings? If not, have appointed substitutes attended to preserve cross-functionality and full representation?

      <--- Score

      104. What are the boundaries of the scope? What is in bounds and what is not? What is the start point? What is the stop point?

      <--- Score

      105. Are approval levels defined for contracts and supplements to contracts?

      <--- Score

      106. Do you have organizational privacy requirements?

      <--- Score

      107. Is data collected and displayed to better understand customer(s) critical needs and requirements.

      <--- Score

      108. What is the worst case scenario?

      <--- Score

      109. What Design Engineering and Construction Services requirements should be gathered?

      <--- Score

      110. What scope do you want your strategy to cover?

      <--- Score

      111. Who defines (or who defined) the rules and roles?

      <--- Score

      112. Is there a critical path to deliver Design Engineering and Construction Services results?

      <--- Score

      113. What scope to assess?

      <--- Score

      114. Are roles and responsibilities formally defined?

      <--- Score

      115. What is the definition of Design Engineering and Construction Services excellence?

      <--- Score

      116. How did the Design Engineering and Construction Services manager receive input to the development of a Design Engineering and Construction Services improvement plan and the estimated completion dates/times of each activity?

      <--- Score

      117. Has your scope been defined?

      <--- Score

      118. Has the Design Engineering and Construction Services work been fairly and/or equitably divided and delegated among team members who are qualified and capable to perform the work? Has everyone contributed?

      <--- Score

      119. What are the rough order estimates on cost savings/opportunities that Design Engineering and Construction Services brings?

      <--- Score

      120. Have all of the relationships been defined properly?

      <--- Score

      121. How do you think the partners involved in Design Engineering and Construction Services would have defined success?

      <--- Score

      122. Are resources adequate for the scope?

      <--- Score

      123. When is/was the Design Engineering and Construction Services start date?

      <--- Score

      124. Are accountability and ownership for Design Engineering and Construction Services clearly defined?

      <--- Score

      125. If substitutes have been appointed, have they been briefed on the Design Engineering and Construction Services goals and received regular communications as to the progress to date?

      <--- Score

      126. How do you gather requirements?

      <--- Score

      127. Where can you gather more information?

      <--- Score

      128. Are the Design Engineering and Construction Services requirements complete?

      <--- Score

      129. When is the estimated completion date?

      <--- Score

      130. Is Design Engineering and Construction Services currently on schedule according to the plan?

      <--- Score

      131. Does the team have regular meetings?

      <--- Score

      132. What are the compelling stakeholder reasons for embarking on Design Engineering and Construction Services?

      <--- Score

      133. What information do you gather?

      <--- Score

      134. What is in scope?

      <--- Score

      135. How do you manage scope?

      <--- Score

      Add up total points for this section: _____ = Total points for this section

      Divided by: ______ (number of statements answered) = ______ Average score for this section

      Transfer your score to the Design Engineering and Construction Services Index at the beginning of the Self-Assessment.

      CRITERION #3: MEASURE:

      INTENT: Gather the correct data. Measure the current performance and evolution of the situation.

      In my belief, the answer to this question is clearly defined:

      5 Strongly Agree

      4 Agree

      3 Neutral

      2 Disagree

      1 Strongly Disagree

      1. How do you prevent mis-estimating cost?

      <--- Score

      2. At what cost?

      <--- Score

      3. What can be used to verify compliance?

      <--- Score

      4. Do the benefits outweigh the costs?

      <--- Score

      5. What would be a real cause for concern?

      <--- Score

      6. How are you verifying it?

      <--- Score

      7. Where is the cost?

      <--- Score

      8. Was a business case (cost/benefit) developed?

      <--- Score

      9. What are the costs of delaying Design Engineering and Construction Services action?

      <--- Score

      10. Does the Design Engineering and Construction Services task fit the client’s priorities?

      <--- Score

      11. How do you verify performance?

      <--- Score

      12. How do you focus on what is right -not who is right?

      <--- Score

      13. Who should receive measurement reports?

      <--- Score

      14. Do you have an issue in getting priority?

      <--- Score

      15. What potential environmental factors impact the Design Engineering and Construction Services effort?

      <--- Score

      16.