Medical History A Complete Guide - 2020 Edition. Gerardus Blokdyk

Score

      13. What are the rough order estimates on cost savings/opportunities that Medical history brings?

      <--- Score

      14. How do you gather the stories?

      <--- Score

      15. How do you manage unclear Medical history requirements?

      <--- Score

      16. Will team members perform Medical history work when assigned and in a timely fashion?

      <--- Score

      17. How do you gather requirements?

      <--- Score

      18. What are the record-keeping requirements of Medical history activities?

      <--- Score

      19. What are the tasks and definitions?

      <--- Score

      20. How will the Medical history team and the group measure complete success of Medical history?

      <--- Score

      21. What are the core elements of the Medical history business case?

      <--- Score

      22. How does the Medical history manager ensure against scope creep?

      <--- Score

      23. What is the scope of Medical history?

      <--- Score

      24. What gets examined?

      <--- Score

      25. Is there a completed, verified, and validated high-level ‘as is’ (not ‘should be’ or ‘could be’) stakeholder process map?

      <--- Score

      26. Scope of sensitive information?

      <--- Score

      27. How do you think the partners involved in Medical history would have defined success?

      <--- Score

      28. Is there a critical path to deliver Medical history results?

      <--- Score

      29. Is the improvement team aware of the different versions of a process: what they think it is vs. what it actually is vs. what it should be vs. what it could be?

      <--- Score

      30. Has a high-level ‘as is’ process map been completed, verified and validated?

      <--- Score

      31. Has anyone else (internal or external to the group) attempted to solve this problem or a similar one before? If so, what knowledge can be leveraged from these previous efforts?

      <--- Score

      32. Are the Medical history requirements complete?

      <--- Score

      33. How and when will the baselines be defined?

      <--- Score

      34. What is the scope of the Medical history effort?

      <--- Score

      35. What are the boundaries of the scope? What is in bounds and what is not? What is the start point? What is the stop point?

      <--- Score

      36. Is Medical history required?

      <--- Score

      37. Are task requirements clearly defined?

      <--- Score

      38. If substitutes have been appointed, have they been briefed on the Medical history goals and received regular communications as to the progress to date?

      <--- Score

      39. What happens if Medical history’s scope changes?

      <--- Score

      40. What is out of scope?

      <--- Score

      41. How often are the team meetings?

      <--- Score

      42. What knowledge or experience is required?

      <--- Score

      43. Has your scope been defined?

      <--- Score

      44. Is the Medical history scope manageable?

      <--- Score

      45. How do you manage scope?

      <--- Score

      46. What Medical history requirements should be gathered?

      <--- Score

      47. Do you have organizational privacy requirements?

      <--- Score

      48. Who defines (or who defined) the rules and roles?

      <--- Score

      49. What key stakeholder process output measure(s) does Medical history leverage and how?

      <--- Score

      50. What customer feedback methods were used to solicit their input?

      <--- Score

      51. Is the scope of Medical history defined?

      <--- Score

      52. How have you defined all Medical history requirements first?

      <--- Score

      53. Are accountability and ownership for Medical history clearly defined?

      <--- Score

      54. Are all requirements met?

      <--- Score

      55. Are audit criteria, scope, frequency and methods defined?

      <--- Score

      56. Is the team formed and are team leaders (Coaches and Management Leads) assigned?

      <--- Score

      57. Is the team sponsored by a champion or stakeholder leader?

      <--- Score

      58. Are roles and responsibilities formally defined?

      <--- Score

      59. What is in the scope and what is not in scope?

      <--- Score

      60. Is there a completed SIPOC representation, describing the Suppliers, Inputs, Process, Outputs, and Customers?

      <--- Score

      61. Has a team charter been developed and communicated?

      <--- Score

      62. Is there a clear Medical history case definition?

      <--- Score

      63. Has a project plan, Gantt chart, or similar been developed/completed?

      <--- Score

      64. Has the Medical history work been fairly and/or equitably divided and delegated among team members who are qualified and capable to perform the work? Has everyone contributed?

      <--- Score

      65. What are the Medical history use cases?

      <--- Score

      66. Is there a Medical history management charter, including stakeholder case, problem and goal statements, scope, milestones, roles and responsibilities, communication plan?

      <--- Score

      67. Who approved the Medical history scope?

      <--- Score

      68. Is the current ‘as is’ process being followed? If not, what are the discrepancies?