IBM Cloud Object Storage A Complete Guide - 2020 Edition. Gerardus Blokdyk

      63. What are the core elements of the IBM Cloud Object Storage business case?

      <--- Score

      64. Has anyone else (internal or external to the group) attempted to solve this problem or a similar one before? If so, what knowledge can be leveraged from these previous efforts?

      <--- Score

      65. What is the context?

      <--- Score

      66. The political context: who holds power?

      <--- Score

      67. How are consistent IBM Cloud Object Storage definitions important?

      <--- Score

      68. Are task requirements clearly defined?

      <--- Score

      69. How is the team tracking and documenting its work?

      <--- Score

      70. What is the definition of success?

      <--- Score

      71. How do you manage changes in IBM Cloud Object Storage requirements?

      <--- Score

      72. Are there any constraints known that bear on the ability to perform IBM Cloud Object Storage work? How is the team addressing them?

      <--- Score

      73. When is the estimated completion date?

      <--- Score

      74. How do you catch IBM Cloud Object Storage definition inconsistencies?

      <--- Score

      75. Have all basic functions of IBM Cloud Object Storage been defined?

      <--- Score

      76. How do you manage scope?

      <--- Score

      77. Is the IBM Cloud Object Storage scope manageable?

      <--- Score

      78. Does the scope remain the same?

      <--- Score

      79. Is the work to date meeting requirements?

      <--- Score

      80. What information do you gather?

      <--- Score

      81. Why are you doing IBM Cloud Object Storage and what is the scope?

      <--- Score

      82. Has the improvement team collected the ‘voice of the customer’ (obtained feedback – qualitative and quantitative)?

      <--- Score

      83. What are the requirements for audit information?

      <--- Score

      84. What are (control) requirements for IBM Cloud Object Storage Information?

      <--- Score

      85. Are different versions of process maps needed to account for the different types of inputs?

      <--- Score

      86. Has a high-level ‘as is’ process map been completed, verified and validated?

      <--- Score

      87. What are the tasks and definitions?

      <--- Score

      88. How was the ‘as is’ process map developed, reviewed, verified and validated?

      <--- Score

      89. What knowledge or experience is required?

      <--- Score

      90. What is out of scope?

      <--- Score

      91. Do you have a IBM Cloud Object Storage success story or case study ready to tell and share?

      <--- Score

      92. What scope do you want your strategy to cover?

      <--- Score

      93. What are the boundaries of the scope? What is in bounds and what is not? What is the start point? What is the stop point?

      <--- Score

      94. What defines best in class?

      <--- Score

      95. Are all requirements met?

      <--- Score

      96. What would be the goal or target for a IBM Cloud Object Storage’s improvement team?

      <--- Score

      97. Have the customer needs been translated into specific, measurable requirements? How?

      <--- Score

      98. Has the direction changed at all during the course of IBM Cloud Object Storage? If so, when did it change and why?

      <--- Score

      99. Is the team adequately staffed with the desired cross-functionality? If not, what additional resources are available to the team?

      <--- Score

      100. What are the IBM Cloud Object Storage use cases?

      <--- Score

      101. What baselines are required to be defined and managed?

      <--- Score

      102. What specifically is the problem? Where does it occur? When does it occur? What is its extent?

      <--- Score

      103. Are audit criteria, scope, frequency and methods defined?

      <--- Score

      104. How did the IBM Cloud Object Storage manager receive input to the development of a IBM Cloud Object Storage improvement plan and the estimated completion dates/times of each activity?

      <--- Score

      105. Is there a completed, verified, and validated high-level ‘as is’ (not ‘should be’ or ‘could be’) stakeholder process map?

      <--- Score

      106. Has the IBM Cloud Object Storage work been fairly and/or equitably divided and delegated among team members who are qualified and capable to perform the work? Has everyone contributed?

      <--- Score

      107. What are the compelling stakeholder reasons for embarking on IBM Cloud Object Storage?

      <--- Score

      108. How and when will the baselines be defined?

      <--- Score

      109. How do you think the partners involved in IBM Cloud Object Storage would have defined success?

      <--- Score

      110. Are the IBM Cloud Object Storage requirements complete?

      <--- Score

      111. Is it clearly defined in and to your organization what you do?

      <--- Score

      112. When is/was the IBM Cloud Object Storage start date?

      <--- Score

      113. Has a project plan, Gantt chart, or similar been developed/completed?

      <--- Score

      114. What scope to assess?

      <--- Score

      115. What key stakeholder process output measure(s) does IBM Cloud Object Storage leverage and how?

      <--- Score

      116. Is the team equipped with available and reliable resources?

      <--- Score

      117.