Название | Dynamic Risk Measure A Complete Guide - 2020 Edition |
---|---|
Автор произведения | Gerardus Blokdyk |
Жанр | Зарубежная деловая литература |
Серия | |
Издательство | Зарубежная деловая литература |
Год выпуска | 0 |
isbn | 9781867459620 |
8. What is the worst case scenario?
<--- Score
9. What are the rough order estimates on cost savings/opportunities that Dynamic risk measure brings?
<--- Score
10. What are the record-keeping requirements of Dynamic risk measure activities?
<--- Score
11. What are the tasks and definitions?
<--- Score
12. Do you have a Dynamic risk measure success story or case study ready to tell and share?
<--- Score
13. Will a Dynamic risk measure production readiness review be required?
<--- Score
14. How do you hand over Dynamic risk measure context?
<--- Score
15. What sources do you use to gather information for a Dynamic risk measure study?
<--- Score
16. Is there regularly 100% attendance at the team meetings? If not, have appointed substitutes attended to preserve cross-functionality and full representation?
<--- Score
17. Are different versions of process maps needed to account for the different types of inputs?
<--- Score
18. Who are the Dynamic risk measure improvement team members, including Management Leads and Coaches?
<--- Score
19. Is Dynamic risk measure currently on schedule according to the plan?
<--- Score
20. What are the compelling stakeholder reasons for embarking on Dynamic risk measure?
<--- Score
21. How will variation in the actual durations of each activity be dealt with to ensure that the expected Dynamic risk measure results are met?
<--- Score
22. Have the customer needs been translated into specific, measurable requirements? How?
<--- Score
23. Who is gathering information?
<--- Score
24. Is there any additional Dynamic risk measure definition of success?
<--- Score
25. Are required metrics defined, what are they?
<--- Score
26. What system do you use for gathering Dynamic risk measure information?
<--- Score
27. Is the Dynamic risk measure scope manageable?
<--- Score
28. What customer feedback methods were used to solicit their input?
<--- Score
29. What sort of initial information to gather?
<--- Score
30. Is the scope of Dynamic risk measure defined?
<--- Score
31. Has a high-level ‘as is’ process map been completed, verified and validated?
<--- Score
32. When are meeting minutes sent out? Who is on the distribution list?
<--- Score
33. Has the Dynamic risk measure work been fairly and/or equitably divided and delegated among team members who are qualified and capable to perform the work? Has everyone contributed?
<--- Score
34. What was the context?
<--- Score
35. What is the context?
<--- Score
36. What defines best in class?
<--- Score
37. What is the scope of the Dynamic risk measure work?
<--- Score
38. Are resources adequate for the scope?
<--- Score
39. Have all of the relationships been defined properly?
<--- Score
40. What is out-of-scope initially?
<--- Score
41. Is there a Dynamic risk measure management charter, including stakeholder case, problem and goal statements, scope, milestones, roles and responsibilities, communication plan?
<--- Score
42. How and when will the baselines be defined?
<--- Score
43. Does the team have regular meetings?
<--- Score
44. Scope of sensitive information?
<--- Score
45. How do you gather Dynamic risk measure requirements?
<--- Score
46. How do you gather the stories?
<--- Score
47. Are there different segments of customers?
<--- Score
48. What Dynamic risk measure requirements should be gathered?
<--- Score
49. What gets examined?
<--- Score
50. The political context: who holds power?
<--- Score
51. Is the current ‘as is’ process being followed? If not, what are the discrepancies?
<--- Score
52. How is the team tracking and documenting its work?
<--- Score
53. Have specific policy objectives been defined?
<--- Score
54. When is the estimated completion date?
<--- Score
55. How do you keep key subject matter experts in the loop?
<--- Score
56. Is scope creep really all bad news?
<--- Score
57. Is there a completed, verified, and validated high-level ‘as is’ (not ‘should be’ or ‘could be’) stakeholder process map?
<--- Score
58. How do you think the partners involved in Dynamic risk measure would have defined success?
<--- Score
59. What constraints exist that might impact the team?
<--- Score
60. How would you define Dynamic risk measure leadership?
<--- Score
61. Are task requirements clearly defined?
<--- Score
62. What are the Dynamic risk measure use cases?
<--- Score
63. Has your scope been defined?
<--- Score
64. How often are the team meetings?
<--- Score
65.