Carbon Project A Complete Guide - 2020 Edition. Gerardus Blokdyk

Score

      77. How would you define the culture at your organization, how susceptible is it to Carbon project changes?

      <--- Score

      78. What is the context?

      <--- Score

      79. What information should you gather?

      <--- Score

      80. Has anyone else (internal or external to the group) attempted to solve this problem or a similar one before? If so, what knowledge can be leveraged from these previous efforts?

      <--- Score

      81. What constraints exist that might impact the team?

      <--- Score

      82. What gets examined?

      <--- Score

      83. What are the core elements of the Carbon project business case?

      <--- Score

      84. What sources do you use to gather information for a Carbon project study?

      <--- Score

      85. Is the improvement team aware of the different versions of a process: what they think it is vs. what it actually is vs. what it should be vs. what it could be?

      <--- Score

      86. What is the worst case scenario?

      <--- Score

      87. Is the team adequately staffed with the desired cross-functionality? If not, what additional resources are available to the team?

      <--- Score

      88. Has a high-level ‘as is’ process map been completed, verified and validated?

      <--- Score

      89. What customer feedback methods were used to solicit their input?

      <--- Score

      90. How do you keep key subject matter experts in the loop?

      <--- Score

      91. If substitutes have been appointed, have they been briefed on the Carbon project goals and received regular communications as to the progress to date?

      <--- Score

      92. How is the team tracking and documenting its work?

      <--- Score

      93. Who defines (or who defined) the rules and roles?

      <--- Score

      94. What is a worst-case scenario for losses?

      <--- Score

      95. What defines best in class?

      <--- Score

      96. Are approval levels defined for contracts and supplements to contracts?

      <--- Score

      97. What is out of scope?

      <--- Score

      98. How do you gather the stories?

      <--- Score

      99. How would you define Carbon project leadership?

      <--- Score

      100. How do you build the right business case?

      <--- Score

      101. Do the problem and goal statements meet the SMART criteria (specific, measurable, attainable, relevant, and time-bound)?

      <--- Score

      102. How did the Carbon project manager receive input to the development of a Carbon project improvement plan and the estimated completion dates/times of each activity?

      <--- Score

      103. Are different versions of process maps needed to account for the different types of inputs?

      <--- Score

      104. Are all requirements met?

      <--- Score

      105. Are there any constraints known that bear on the ability to perform Carbon project work? How is the team addressing them?

      <--- Score

      106. What scope do you want your strategy to cover?

      <--- Score

      107. Do you have organizational privacy requirements?

      <--- Score

      108. Is scope creep really all bad news?

      <--- Score

      109. Is the Carbon project scope manageable?

      <--- Score

      110. Have all basic functions of Carbon project been defined?

      <--- Score

      111. Who are the Carbon project improvement team members, including Management Leads and Coaches?

      <--- Score

      112. How was the ‘as is’ process map developed, reviewed, verified and validated?

      <--- Score

      113. What knowledge or experience is required?

      <--- Score

      114. Has the Carbon project work been fairly and/or equitably divided and delegated among team members who are qualified and capable to perform the work? Has everyone contributed?

      <--- Score

      115. Is there regularly 100% attendance at the team meetings? If not, have appointed substitutes attended to preserve cross-functionality and full representation?

      <--- Score

      116. Is there a critical path to deliver Carbon project results?

      <--- Score

      117. Are there different segments of customers?

      <--- Score

      118. Are roles and responsibilities formally defined?

      <--- Score

      119. What system do you use for gathering Carbon project information?

      <--- Score

      120. What Carbon project requirements should be gathered?

      <--- Score

      121. What is in the scope and what is not in scope?

      <--- Score

      122. What are the Carbon project tasks and definitions?

      <--- Score

      123. What are the boundaries of the scope? What is in bounds and what is not? What is the start point? What is the stop point?

      <--- Score

      124. Is Carbon project currently on schedule according to the plan?

      <--- Score

      125. Is the work to date meeting requirements?

      <--- Score

      126. What is out-of-scope initially?

      <--- Score

      127. Has a team charter been developed and communicated?

      <--- Score

      128. Has the direction changed at all during the course of Carbon project? If so, when did it change and why?

      <--- Score

      129. Has your scope been defined?

      <--- Score

      130. Are resources adequate for the scope?

      <--- Score

      Add up total points for this section: _____ = Total points for this