PCB Electrical Test A Complete Guide - 2020 Edition. Gerardus Blokdyk

Is the current ‘as is’ process being followed? If not, what are the discrepancies?

      <--- Score

      123. Are task requirements clearly defined?

      <--- Score

      124. How often are the team meetings?

      <--- Score

      125. How did the PCB electrical test manager receive input to the development of a PCB electrical test improvement plan and the estimated completion dates/times of each activity?

      <--- Score

      126. Have the customer needs been translated into specific, measurable requirements? How?

      <--- Score

      127. Has a PCB electrical test requirement not been met?

      <--- Score

      128. What is out-of-scope initially?

      <--- Score

      129. How are consistent PCB electrical test definitions important?

      <--- Score

      130. How do you catch PCB electrical test definition inconsistencies?

      <--- Score

      131. Are required metrics defined, what are they?

      <--- Score

      132. Does the team have regular meetings?

      <--- Score

      133. Is there a completed SIPOC representation, describing the Suppliers, Inputs, Process, Outputs, and Customers?

      <--- Score

      134. What is out of scope?

      <--- Score

      135. What PCB electrical test requirements should be gathered?

      <--- Score

      136. In what way can you redefine the criteria of choice clients have in your category in your favor?

      <--- Score

      137. How do you gather requirements?

      <--- Score

      138. Is the team equipped with available and reliable resources?

      <--- Score

      139. What information do you gather?

      <--- Score

      140. How would you define the culture at your organization, how susceptible is it to PCB electrical test changes?

      <--- Score

      141. Is there regularly 100% attendance at the team meetings? If not, have appointed substitutes attended to preserve cross-functionality and full representation?

      <--- Score

      142. How can the value of PCB electrical test be defined?

      <--- Score

      Add up total points for this section: _____ = Total points for this section

      Divided by: ______ (number of statements answered) = ______ Average score for this section

      Transfer your score to the PCB electrical test Index at the beginning of the Self-Assessment.

      CRITERION #3: MEASURE:

      INTENT: Gather the correct data. Measure the current performance and evolution of the situation.

      In my belief, the answer to this question is clearly defined:

      5 Strongly Agree

      4 Agree

      3 Neutral

      2 Disagree

      1 Strongly Disagree

      1. Do you effectively measure and reward individual and team performance?

      <--- Score

      2. What are the costs?

      <--- Score

      3. How do you verify and develop ideas and innovations?

      <--- Score

      4. What details are required of the PCB electrical test cost structure?

      <--- Score

      5. Are you able to realize any cost savings?

      <--- Score

      6. Are you taking your company in the direction of better and revenue or cheaper and cost?

      <--- Score

      7. Are indirect costs charged to the PCB electrical test program?

      <--- Score

      8. What would it cost to replace your technology?

      <--- Score

      9. What are you verifying?

      <--- Score

      10. What is measured? Why?

      <--- Score

      11. How can you measure the performance?

      <--- Score

      12. Will PCB electrical test have an impact on current business continuity, disaster recovery processes and/or infrastructure?

      <--- Score

      13. How sensitive must the PCB electrical test strategy be to cost?

      <--- Score

      14. How are measurements made?

      <--- Score

      15. How do you focus on what is right -not who is right?

      <--- Score

      16. What does verifying compliance entail?

      <--- Score

      17. How do you aggregate measures across priorities?

      <--- Score

      18. Has a cost center been established?

      <--- Score

      19. What are hidden PCB electrical test quality costs?

      <--- Score

      20. Who pays the cost?

      <--- Score

      21. The approach of traditional PCB electrical test works for detail complexity but is focused on a systematic approach rather than an understanding of the nature of systems themselves, what approach will permit your organization to deal with the kind of unpredictable emergent behaviors that dynamic complexity can introduce?

      <--- Score

      22. What is the cause of any PCB electrical test gaps?

      <--- Score

      23. What relevant entities could be measured?

      <--- Score

      24. How do you verify your resources?

      <--- Score

      25. How is progress measured?

      <--- Score

      26. What are your operating costs?

      <--- Score

      27. What are the PCB electrical test investment costs?

      <--- Score

      28. Are missed PCB electrical test opportunities costing your organization money?

      <--- Score

      29. What causes investor action?

      <--- Score

      30. Are there measurements based on task performance?

      <--- Score

      31. Are actual costs in line with budgeted costs?