Tracking Systems A Complete Guide - 2020 Edition. Gerardus Blokdyk

meetings?

      <--- Score

      73. What are the tasks and definitions?

      <--- Score

      74. Are approval levels defined for contracts and supplements to contracts?

      <--- Score

      75. Has the Tracking systems work been fairly and/or equitably divided and delegated among team members who are qualified and capable to perform the work? Has everyone contributed?

      <--- Score

      76. When are meeting minutes sent out? Who is on the distribution list?

      <--- Score

      77. What happens if Tracking systems’s scope changes?

      <--- Score

      78. Has your scope been defined?

      <--- Score

      79. Is the scope of Tracking systems defined?

      <--- Score

      80. Are task requirements clearly defined?

      <--- Score

      81. What is the scope?

      <--- Score

      82. Has anyone else (internal or external to the group) attempted to solve this problem or a similar one before? If so, what knowledge can be leveraged from these previous efforts?

      <--- Score

      83. Is there a clear Tracking systems case definition?

      <--- Score

      84. Are roles and responsibilities formally defined?

      <--- Score

      85. When is the estimated completion date?

      <--- Score

      86. What are the requirements for audit information?

      <--- Score

      87. Has the improvement team collected the ‘voice of the customer’ (obtained feedback – qualitative and quantitative)?

      <--- Score

      88. Have all of the relationships been defined properly?

      <--- Score

      89. What gets examined?

      <--- Score

      90. How do you keep key subject matter experts in the loop?

      <--- Score

      91. What is the definition of Tracking systems excellence?

      <--- Score

      92. Are all requirements met?

      <--- Score

      93. What constraints exist that might impact the team?

      <--- Score

      94. Is it clearly defined in and to your organization what you do?

      <--- Score

      95. Do you have organizational privacy requirements?

      <--- Score

      96. What critical content must be communicated – who, what, when, where, and how?

      <--- Score

      97. What was the context?

      <--- Score

      98. Who is gathering Tracking systems information?

      <--- Score

      99. What baselines are required to be defined and managed?

      <--- Score

      100. How did the Tracking systems manager receive input to the development of a Tracking systems improvement plan and the estimated completion dates/times of each activity?

      <--- Score

      101. What system do you use for gathering Tracking systems information?

      <--- Score

      102. How would you define the culture at your organization, how susceptible is it to Tracking systems changes?

      <--- Score

      103. How do you hand over Tracking systems context?

      <--- Score

      104. Is there a critical path to deliver Tracking systems results?

      <--- Score

      105. What knowledge or experience is required?

      <--- Score

      106. What are (control) requirements for Tracking systems Information?

      <--- Score

      107. Is there a completed SIPOC representation, describing the Suppliers, Inputs, Process, Outputs, and Customers?

      <--- Score

      108. How was the ‘as is’ process map developed, reviewed, verified and validated?

      <--- Score

      109. What is the worst case scenario?

      <--- Score

      110. Is special Tracking systems user knowledge required?

      <--- Score

      111. Is there regularly 100% attendance at the team meetings? If not, have appointed substitutes attended to preserve cross-functionality and full representation?

      <--- Score

      112. Is the Tracking systems scope manageable?

      <--- Score

      113. How will the Tracking systems team and the group measure complete success of Tracking systems?

      <--- Score

      114. Do the problem and goal statements meet the SMART criteria (specific, measurable, attainable, relevant, and time-bound)?

      <--- Score

      115. Is the current ‘as is’ process being followed? If not, what are the discrepancies?

      <--- Score

      116. Has the direction changed at all during the course of Tracking systems? If so, when did it change and why?

      <--- Score

      117. Why are you doing Tracking systems and what is the scope?

      <--- Score

      118. Is scope creep really all bad news?

      <--- Score

      119. What information should you gather?

      <--- Score

      120. When is/was the Tracking systems start date?

      <--- Score

      121. How does the Tracking systems manager ensure against scope creep?

      <--- Score

      122. Are different versions of process maps needed to account for the different types of inputs?

      <--- Score

      123. What sources do you use to gather information for a Tracking systems study?

      <--- Score

      124. Is the work to date meeting requirements?

      <--- Score

      125. Do you all define Tracking systems in the same way?

      <--- Score

      126. Has a team charter been developed and communicated?

      <--- Score

      127. Is Tracking systems currently on schedule according to the plan?

      <--- Score

      128. Do