Название | Environmental Business A Complete Guide - 2020 Edition |
---|---|
Автор произведения | Gerardus Blokdyk |
Жанр | Зарубежная деловая литература |
Серия | |
Издательство | Зарубежная деловая литература |
Год выпуска | 0 |
isbn | 9781867461777 |
<--- Score
13. Is the Environmental business scope manageable?
<--- Score
14. What constraints exist that might impact the team?
<--- Score
15. How do you manage unclear Environmental business requirements?
<--- Score
16. What critical content must be communicated – who, what, when, where, and how?
<--- Score
17. How will variation in the actual durations of each activity be dealt with to ensure that the expected Environmental business results are met?
<--- Score
18. Does the scope remain the same?
<--- Score
19. Is there a completed, verified, and validated high-level ‘as is’ (not ‘should be’ or ‘could be’) stakeholder process map?
<--- Score
20. What specifically is the problem? Where does it occur? When does it occur? What is its extent?
<--- Score
21. How do you think the partners involved in Environmental business would have defined success?
<--- Score
22. Has the direction changed at all during the course of Environmental business? If so, when did it change and why?
<--- Score
23. What knowledge or experience is required?
<--- Score
24. What are the record-keeping requirements of Environmental business activities?
<--- Score
25. Is the Environmental business scope complete and appropriately sized?
<--- Score
26. Who defines (or who defined) the rules and roles?
<--- Score
27. What intelligence can you gather?
<--- Score
28. How have you defined all Environmental business requirements first?
<--- Score
29. Has a high-level ‘as is’ process map been completed, verified and validated?
<--- Score
30. How does the Environmental business manager ensure against scope creep?
<--- Score
31. Is the team equipped with available and reliable resources?
<--- Score
32. What is out of scope?
<--- Score
33. What would be the goal or target for a Environmental business’s improvement team?
<--- Score
34. Is there a Environmental business management charter, including stakeholder case, problem and goal statements, scope, milestones, roles and responsibilities, communication plan?
<--- Score
35. What is the scope?
<--- Score
36. How do you catch Environmental business definition inconsistencies?
<--- Score
37. Are audit criteria, scope, frequency and methods defined?
<--- Score
38. What information should you gather?
<--- Score
39. Do you have a Environmental business success story or case study ready to tell and share?
<--- Score
40. Have specific policy objectives been defined?
<--- Score
41. Is there a clear Environmental business case definition?
<--- Score
42. When are meeting minutes sent out? Who is on the distribution list?
<--- Score
43. Has everyone on the team, including the team leaders, been properly trained?
<--- Score
44. What are the rough order estimates on cost savings/opportunities that Environmental business brings?
<--- Score
45. Does the team have regular meetings?
<--- Score
46. Are resources adequate for the scope?
<--- Score
47. Scope of sensitive information?
<--- Score
48. Are there different segments of customers?
<--- Score
49. The political context: who holds power?
<--- Score
50. Is there a completed SIPOC representation, describing the Suppliers, Inputs, Process, Outputs, and Customers?
<--- Score
51. What is the definition of Environmental business excellence?
<--- Score
52. Why are you doing Environmental business and what is the scope?
<--- Score
53. Are approval levels defined for contracts and supplements to contracts?
<--- Score
54. How do you gather the stories?
<--- Score
55. Who are the Environmental business improvement team members, including Management Leads and Coaches?
<--- Score
56. Is full participation by members in regularly held team meetings guaranteed?
<--- Score
57. Are task requirements clearly defined?
<--- Score
58. Are accountability and ownership for Environmental business clearly defined?
<--- Score
59. What gets examined?
<--- Score
60. Is the improvement team aware of the different versions of a process: what they think it is vs. what it actually is vs. what it should be vs. what it could be?
<--- Score
61. What is in the scope and what is not in scope?
<--- Score
62. Are roles and responsibilities formally defined?
<--- Score
63. Is there a critical path to deliver Environmental business results?
<--- Score
64. What is in scope?
<--- Score
65. What is the worst case scenario?
<--- Score
66. How and when will the baselines be defined?
<--- Score
67. Have the customer needs been translated into specific, measurable requirements? How?
<--- Score
68. Has/have the customer(s) been identified?