Functional Database Model A Complete Guide - 2020 Edition. Gerardus Blokdyk

Читать онлайн.
Название Functional Database Model A Complete Guide - 2020 Edition
Автор произведения Gerardus Blokdyk
Жанр Зарубежная деловая литература
Серия
Издательство Зарубежная деловая литература
Год выпуска 0
isbn 9781867460756



Скачать книгу

measure(s) does Functional Database Model leverage and how?

      <--- Score

      67. What intelligence can you gather?

      <--- Score

      68. Is Functional Database Model currently on schedule according to the plan?

      <--- Score

      69. Are roles and responsibilities formally defined?

      <--- Score

      70. What are the boundaries of the scope? What is in bounds and what is not? What is the start point? What is the stop point?

      <--- Score

      71. Is there a Functional Database Model management charter, including stakeholder case, problem and goal statements, scope, milestones, roles and responsibilities, communication plan?

      <--- Score

      72. Have all of the relationships been defined properly?

      <--- Score

      73. How are consistent Functional Database Model definitions important?

      <--- Score

      74. How do you keep key subject matter experts in the loop?

      <--- Score

      75. Is Functional Database Model required?

      <--- Score

      76. Has the Functional Database Model work been fairly and/or equitably divided and delegated among team members who are qualified and capable to perform the work? Has everyone contributed?

      <--- Score

      77. When are meeting minutes sent out? Who is on the distribution list?

      <--- Score

      78. Are all requirements met?

      <--- Score

      79. What gets examined?

      <--- Score

      80. What is a worst-case scenario for losses?

      <--- Score

      81. Is it clearly defined in and to your organization what you do?

      <--- Score

      82. What happens if Functional Database Model’s scope changes?

      <--- Score

      83. Is the Functional Database Model scope manageable?

      <--- Score

      84. Have all basic functions of Functional Database Model been defined?

      <--- Score

      85. What baselines are required to be defined and managed?

      <--- Score

      86. How do you gather the stories?

      <--- Score

      87. How would you define Functional Database Model leadership?

      <--- Score

      88. Are accountability and ownership for Functional Database Model clearly defined?

      <--- Score

      89. What is the definition of Functional Database Model excellence?

      <--- Score

      90. Are the Functional Database Model requirements testable?

      <--- Score

      91. If substitutes have been appointed, have they been briefed on the Functional Database Model goals and received regular communications as to the progress to date?

      <--- Score

      92. What critical content must be communicated – who, what, when, where, and how?

      <--- Score

      93. How will variation in the actual durations of each activity be dealt with to ensure that the expected Functional Database Model results are met?

      <--- Score

      94. Is there any additional Functional Database Model definition of success?

      <--- Score

      95. What constraints exist that might impact the team?

      <--- Score

      96. What is in the scope and what is not in scope?

      <--- Score

      97. What is out of scope?

      <--- Score

      98. Do you have a Functional Database Model success story or case study ready to tell and share?

      <--- Score

      99. Will a Functional Database Model production readiness review be required?

      <--- Score

      100. Who is gathering information?

      <--- Score

      101. How did the Functional Database Model manager receive input to the development of a Functional Database Model improvement plan and the estimated completion dates/times of each activity?

      <--- Score

      102. Is there a completed, verified, and validated high-level ‘as is’ (not ‘should be’ or ‘could be’) stakeholder process map?

      <--- Score

      103. How was the ‘as is’ process map developed, reviewed, verified and validated?

      <--- Score

      104. Who defines (or who defined) the rules and roles?

      <--- Score

      105. What are the Roles and Responsibilities for each team member and its leadership? Where is this documented?

      <--- Score

      106. Is there regularly 100% attendance at the team meetings? If not, have appointed substitutes attended to preserve cross-functionality and full representation?

      <--- Score

      107. Has a high-level ‘as is’ process map been completed, verified and validated?

      <--- Score

      108. Are audit criteria, scope, frequency and methods defined?

      <--- Score

      109. Is Functional Database Model linked to key stakeholder goals and objectives?

      <--- Score

      110. Has a project plan, Gantt chart, or similar been developed/completed?

      <--- Score

      111. What are the dynamics of the communication plan?

      <--- Score

      112. Has anyone else (internal or external to the group) attempted to solve this problem or a similar one before? If so, what knowledge can be leveraged from these previous efforts?

      <--- Score

      113. Has a team charter been developed and communicated?

      <--- Score

      114. Does the team have regular meetings?

      <--- Score

      115. What information should you gather?

      <--- Score

      116. How often are the team meetings?

      <--- Score

      117. Have specific policy objectives been defined?

      <--- Score

      118. Do the problem and goal statements meet the SMART criteria (specific, measurable, attainable, relevant, and time-bound)?

      <--- Score

      119. How have you defined