Parameterized Testing A Complete Guide - 2020 Edition. Gerardus Blokdyk

How will variation in the actual durations of each activity be dealt with to ensure that the expected Parameterized testing results are met?

      <--- Score

      62. What is the scope of the Parameterized testing work?

      <--- Score

      63. How would you define Parameterized testing leadership?

      <--- Score

      64. How was the ‘as is’ process map developed, reviewed, verified and validated?

      <--- Score

      65. What is the definition of success?

      <--- Score

      66. How would you define the culture at your organization, how susceptible is it to Parameterized testing changes?

      <--- Score

      67. How are consistent Parameterized testing definitions important?

      <--- Score

      68. Are roles and responsibilities formally defined?

      <--- Score

      69. Who is gathering Parameterized testing information?

      <--- Score

      70. How do you think the partners involved in Parameterized testing would have defined success?

      <--- Score

      71. Is Parameterized testing currently on schedule according to the plan?

      <--- Score

      72. What customer feedback methods were used to solicit their input?

      <--- Score

      73. Are resources adequate for the scope?

      <--- Score

      74. What is the scope of the Parameterized testing effort?

      <--- Score

      75. Has a Parameterized testing requirement not been met?

      <--- Score

      76. What is the definition of Parameterized testing excellence?

      <--- Score

      77. Has everyone on the team, including the team leaders, been properly trained?

      <--- Score

      78. What specifically is the problem? Where does it occur? When does it occur? What is its extent?

      <--- Score

      79. How is the team tracking and documenting its work?

      <--- Score

      80. How do you catch Parameterized testing definition inconsistencies?

      <--- Score

      81. What scope do you want your strategy to cover?

      <--- Score

      82. Is the improvement team aware of the different versions of a process: what they think it is vs. what it actually is vs. what it should be vs. what it could be?

      <--- Score

      83. How do you gather Parameterized testing requirements?

      <--- Score

      84. How often are the team meetings?

      <--- Score

      85. What are the core elements of the Parameterized testing business case?

      <--- Score

      86. Are required metrics defined, what are they?

      <--- Score

      87. What intelligence can you gather?

      <--- Score

      88. Has a project plan, Gantt chart, or similar been developed/completed?

      <--- Score

      89. What are the rough order estimates on cost savings/opportunities that Parameterized testing brings?

      <--- Score

      90. How does the Parameterized testing manager ensure against scope creep?

      <--- Score

      91. Why are you doing Parameterized testing and what is the scope?

      <--- Score

      92. Has anyone else (internal or external to the group) attempted to solve this problem or a similar one before? If so, what knowledge can be leveraged from these previous efforts?

      <--- Score

      93. Do you have organizational privacy requirements?

      <--- Score

      94. How and when will the baselines be defined?

      <--- Score

      95. What is out of scope?

      <--- Score

      96. How do you gather requirements?

      <--- Score

      97. Is it clearly defined in and to your organization what you do?

      <--- Score

      98. Who are the Parameterized testing improvement team members, including Management Leads and Coaches?

      <--- Score

      99. Is scope creep really all bad news?

      <--- Score

      100. Who is gathering information?

      <--- Score

      101. Have the customer needs been translated into specific, measurable requirements? How?

      <--- Score

      102. Is Parameterized testing linked to key stakeholder goals and objectives?

      <--- Score

      103. Are task requirements clearly defined?

      <--- Score

      104. How do you manage unclear Parameterized testing requirements?

      <--- Score

      105. Is there a completed, verified, and validated high-level ‘as is’ (not ‘should be’ or ‘could be’) stakeholder process map?

      <--- Score

      106. What system do you use for gathering Parameterized testing information?

      <--- Score

      107. How do you keep key subject matter experts in the loop?

      <--- Score

      108. What sources do you use to gather information for a Parameterized testing study?

      <--- Score

      109. Has the improvement team collected the ‘voice of the customer’ (obtained feedback – qualitative and quantitative)?

      <--- Score

      110. Is the current ‘as is’ process being followed? If not, what are the discrepancies?

      <--- Score

      111. What is in the scope and what is not in scope?

      <--- Score

      112. What are the dynamics of the communication plan?

      <--- Score

      113. Does the scope remain the same?

      <--- Score

      114. Do you all define Parameterized testing in the same way?

      <--- Score

      115. Are audit criteria, scope, frequency and methods defined?

      <--- Score

      116. What information do you gather?

      <---