Safe Working Load A Complete Guide - 2020 Edition. Gerardus Blokdyk

      <--- Score

      13. What are the requirements for audit information?

      <--- Score

      14. What is the scope?

      <--- Score

      15. How does the Safe Working Load manager ensure against scope creep?

      <--- Score

      16. In what way can you redefine the criteria of choice clients have in your category in your favor?

      <--- Score

      17. Has/have the customer(s) been identified?

      <--- Score

      18. Has the direction changed at all during the course of Safe Working Load? If so, when did it change and why?

      <--- Score

      19. Who is gathering information?

      <--- Score

      20. What constraints exist that might impact the team?

      <--- Score

      21. If substitutes have been appointed, have they been briefed on the Safe Working Load goals and received regular communications as to the progress to date?

      <--- Score

      22. What critical content must be communicated – who, what, when, where, and how?

      <--- Score

      23. How do you manage unclear Safe Working Load requirements?

      <--- Score

      24. Do the problem and goal statements meet the SMART criteria (specific, measurable, attainable, relevant, and time-bound)?

      <--- Score

      25. How do you gather requirements?

      <--- Score

      26. Is there a clear Safe Working Load case definition?

      <--- Score

      27. How would you define Safe Working Load leadership?

      <--- Score

      28. What are the rough order estimates on cost savings/opportunities that Safe Working Load brings?

      <--- Score

      29. What are the dynamics of the communication plan?

      <--- Score

      30. Scope of sensitive information?

      <--- Score

      31. What scope to assess?

      <--- Score

      32. What is out-of-scope initially?

      <--- Score

      33. Are audit criteria, scope, frequency and methods defined?

      <--- Score

      34. Have the customer needs been translated into specific, measurable requirements? How?

      <--- Score

      35. What is the context?

      <--- Score

      36. Are roles and responsibilities formally defined?

      <--- Score

      37. What gets examined?

      <--- Score

      38. Is it clearly defined in and to your organization what you do?

      <--- Score

      39. Are all requirements met?

      <--- Score

      40. Has anyone else (internal or external to the group) attempted to solve this problem or a similar one before? If so, what knowledge can be leveraged from these previous efforts?

      <--- Score

      41. Why are you doing Safe Working Load and what is the scope?

      <--- Score

      42. How do you manage changes in Safe Working Load requirements?

      <--- Score

      43. What sources do you use to gather information for a Safe Working Load study?

      <--- Score

      44. What are the boundaries of the scope? What is in bounds and what is not? What is the start point? What is the stop point?

      <--- Score

      45. Has a project plan, Gantt chart, or similar been developed/completed?

      <--- Score

      46. What Safe Working Load requirements should be gathered?

      <--- Score

      47. How do you hand over Safe Working Load context?

      <--- Score

      48. How do you keep key subject matter experts in the loop?

      <--- Score

      49. How are consistent Safe Working Load definitions important?

      <--- Score

      50. Is data collected and displayed to better understand customer(s) critical needs and requirements.

      <--- Score

      51. What are the record-keeping requirements of Safe Working Load activities?

      <--- Score

      52. Is there regularly 100% attendance at the team meetings? If not, have appointed substitutes attended to preserve cross-functionality and full representation?

      <--- Score

      53. Are different versions of process maps needed to account for the different types of inputs?

      <--- Score

      54. How do you gather Safe Working Load requirements?

      <--- Score

      55. Are accountability and ownership for Safe Working Load clearly defined?

      <--- Score

      56. What is a worst-case scenario for losses?

      <--- Score

      57. What defines best in class?

      <--- Score

      58. Who is gathering Safe Working Load information?

      <--- Score

      59. Does the scope remain the same?

      <--- Score

      60. What are the Roles and Responsibilities for each team member and its leadership? Where is this documented?

      <--- Score

      61. Are the Safe Working Load requirements testable?

      <--- Score

      62. Is special Safe Working Load user knowledge required?

      <--- Score

      63. What happens if Safe Working Load’s scope changes?

      <--- Score

      64. Do you all define Safe Working Load in the same way?

      <--- Score

      65. Has the improvement team collected the ‘voice of the customer’ (obtained feedback – qualitative and quantitative)?

      <--- Score

      66. Is the scope of Safe Working Load defined?

      <--- Score

      67. What specifically is the problem? Where does it occur? When does it occur? What is its extent?

      <--- Score

      68. Has a Safe Working Load requirement not been met?

      <---