Google Apps A Complete Guide - 2020 Edition. Gerardus Blokdyk

meetings?

      <--- Score

      79. What is a worst-case scenario for losses?

      <--- Score

      80. Has anyone else (internal or external to the group) attempted to solve this problem or a similar one before? If so, what knowledge can be leveraged from these previous efforts?

      <--- Score

      81. How will variation in the actual durations of each activity be dealt with to ensure that the expected Google Apps results are met?

      <--- Score

      82. Will team members regularly document their Google Apps work?

      <--- Score

      83. How do you catch Google Apps definition inconsistencies?

      <--- Score

      84. Are accountability and ownership for Google Apps clearly defined?

      <--- Score

      85. When is the estimated completion date?

      <--- Score

      86. Who is gathering information?

      <--- Score

      87. How is the team tracking and documenting its work?

      <--- Score

      88. Are the Google Apps requirements testable?

      <--- Score

      89. What are the Google Apps tasks and definitions?

      <--- Score

      90. How do you gather Google Apps requirements?

      <--- Score

      91. What sort of initial information to gather?

      <--- Score

      92. Does the scope remain the same?

      <--- Score

      93. Has your scope been defined?

      <--- Score

      94. Is Google Apps currently on schedule according to the plan?

      <--- Score

      95. What are the record-keeping requirements of Google Apps activities?

      <--- Score

      96. Are there any constraints known that bear on the ability to perform Google Apps work? How is the team addressing them?

      <--- Score

      97. Has/have the customer(s) been identified?

      <--- Score

      98. Is there regularly 100% attendance at the team meetings? If not, have appointed substitutes attended to preserve cross-functionality and full representation?

      <--- Score

      99. Are there different segments of customers?

      <--- Score

      100. Are approval levels defined for contracts and supplements to contracts?

      <--- Score

      101. What are the Roles and Responsibilities for each team member and its leadership? Where is this documented?

      <--- Score

      102. Are task requirements clearly defined?

      <--- Score

      103. Is the current ‘as is’ process being followed? If not, what are the discrepancies?

      <--- Score

      104. Is the improvement team aware of the different versions of a process: what they think it is vs. what it actually is vs. what it should be vs. what it could be?

      <--- Score

      105. How and when will the baselines be defined?

      <--- Score

      106. When are meeting minutes sent out? Who is on the distribution list?

      <--- Score

      107. Is Google Apps required?

      <--- Score

      108. Do the problem and goal statements meet the SMART criteria (specific, measurable, attainable, relevant, and time-bound)?

      <--- Score

      109. Have the customer needs been translated into specific, measurable requirements? How?

      <--- Score

      110. Is data collected and displayed to better understand customer(s) critical needs and requirements.

      <--- Score

      111. Scope of sensitive information?

      <--- Score

      112. Where can you gather more information?

      <--- Score

      113. What critical content must be communicated – who, what, when, where, and how?

      <--- Score

      114. Has a team charter been developed and communicated?

      <--- Score

      115. How do you build the right business case?

      <--- Score

      116. Have all basic functions of Google Apps been defined?

      <--- Score

      117. How does the Google Apps manager ensure against scope creep?

      <--- Score

      118. Has the improvement team collected the ‘voice of the customer’ (obtained feedback – qualitative and quantitative)?

      <--- Score

      119. What intelligence can you gather?

      <--- Score

      120. Is the team equipped with available and reliable resources?

      <--- Score

      121. Are stakeholder processes mapped?

      <--- Score

      122. If substitutes have been appointed, have they been briefed on the Google Apps goals and received regular communications as to the progress to date?

      <--- Score

      123. Has the direction changed at all during the course of Google Apps? If so, when did it change and why?

      <--- Score

      124. What constraints exist that might impact the team?

      <--- Score

      125. What are (control) requirements for Google Apps Information?

      <--- Score

      126. How do you keep key subject matter experts in the loop?

      <--- Score

      127. How do you manage scope?

      <--- Score

      128. What sources do you use to gather information for a Google Apps study?

      <--- Score

      129. Are resources adequate for the scope?

      <--- Score

      130. Are different versions of process maps needed to account for the different types of inputs?

      <--- Score

      131. Is the Google Apps scope complete and appropriately sized?

      <--- Score

      132. How did the Google Apps manager receive input to the development of a Google Apps improvement plan and the estimated completion dates/times of each activity?

      <--- Score

      133. Are roles and responsibilities