Automotive Safety Integrity Level A Complete Guide - 2020 Edition. Gerardus Blokdyk

Can the software tool malfunction that it introduces or fails to detect errors of safety requirements?

      <--- Score

      117. What are the Automotive Safety Integrity Level use cases?

      <--- Score

      118. Where can you gather more information?

      <--- Score

      119. Have the customer needs been translated into specific, measurable requirements? How?

      <--- Score

      120. How will the Automotive Safety Integrity Level team and the group measure complete success of Automotive Safety Integrity Level?

      <--- Score

      121. What baselines are required to be defined and managed?

      <--- Score

      122. Who defines (or who defined) the rules and roles?

      <--- Score

      123. What are the record-keeping requirements of Automotive Safety Integrity Level activities?

      <--- Score

      124. What intelligence can you gather?

      <--- Score

      125. What is in the scope and what is not in scope?

      <--- Score

      126. Are the Automotive Safety Integrity Level requirements testable?

      <--- Score

      127. Has a team charter been developed and communicated?

      <--- Score

      128. Is Automotive Safety Integrity Level required?

      <--- Score

      129. Has a project plan, Gantt chart, or similar been developed/completed?

      <--- Score

      130. Is there a critical path to deliver Automotive Safety Integrity Level results?

      <--- Score

      131. Is there any additional Automotive Safety Integrity Level definition of success?

      <--- Score

      132. What is in scope?

      <--- Score

      133. Are approval levels defined for contracts and supplements to contracts?

      <--- Score

      134. What is out-of-scope initially?

      <--- Score

      135. How can the value of Automotive Safety Integrity Level be defined?

      <--- Score

      Add up total points for this section: _____ = Total points for this section

      Divided by: ______ (number of statements answered) = ______ Average score for this section

      Transfer your score to the Automotive Safety Integrity Level Index at the beginning of the Self-Assessment.

      CRITERION #3: MEASURE:

      INTENT: Gather the correct data. Measure the current performance and evolution of the situation.

      In my belief, the answer to this question is clearly defined:

      5 Strongly Agree

      4 Agree

      3 Neutral

      2 Disagree

      1 Strongly Disagree

      1. Where can you go to verify the info?

      <--- Score

      2. How is performance measured?

      <--- Score

      3. Who is involved in verifying compliance?

      <--- Score

      4. Have you included everything in your Automotive Safety Integrity Level cost models?

      <--- Score

      5. How is the value delivered by Automotive Safety Integrity Level being measured?

      <--- Score

      6. How do you verify performance?

      <--- Score

      7. How do you mitigate the impact of errors?

      <--- Score

      8. Are you aware of what could cause a problem?

      <--- Score

      9. Why do you expend time and effort to implement measurement, for whom?

      <--- Score

      10. How to quantify safety of measures?

      <--- Score

      11. How do you quantify and qualify impacts?

      <--- Score

      12. How will success or failure be measured?

      <--- Score

      13. What causes investor action?

      <--- Score

      14. How frequently do you track Automotive Safety Integrity Level measures?

      <--- Score

      15. How will you measure success?

      <--- Score

      16. Among the Automotive Safety Integrity Level product and service cost to be estimated, which is considered hardest to estimate?

      <--- Score

      17. What is the Automotive Safety Integrity Level business impact?

      <--- Score

      18. Why do the measurements/indicators matter?

      <--- Score

      19. How can you reduce the costs of obtaining inputs?

      <--- Score

      20. Are there competing Automotive Safety Integrity Level priorities?

      <--- Score

      21. What measurements are being captured?

      <--- Score

      22. How can you reduce costs?

      <--- Score

      23. How frequently do you verify your Automotive Safety Integrity Level strategy?

      <--- Score

      24. Are the units of measure consistent?

      <--- Score

      25. What is measured? Why?

      <--- Score

      26. What can be assumed to be the failure, which would act as cause leading to the hazardous situation?

      <--- Score

      27. How do you measure variability?

      <--- Score

      28. What is the root cause(s) of the problem?

      <--- Score

      29. Is the solution cost-effective?

      <--- Score

      30. What do people want to verify?

      <--- Score

      31. What methods are feasible and acceptable to estimate the impact of reforms?

      <--- Score

      32. What does a Test Case verify?

      <--- Score

      33. What is your Automotive Safety Integrity Level quality cost segregation study?

      <--- Score

      34. What tests verify requirements?