Data Philanthropy A Complete Guide - 2020 Edition. Gerardus Blokdyk

Score

      72. What key stakeholder process output measure(s) does Data philanthropy leverage and how?

      <--- Score

      73. What is out-of-scope initially?

      <--- Score

      74. Are different versions of process maps needed to account for the different types of inputs?

      <--- Score

      75. Do you have organizational privacy requirements?

      <--- Score

      76. Are there any constraints known that bear on the ability to perform Data philanthropy work? How is the team addressing them?

      <--- Score

      77. Is scope creep really all bad news?

      <--- Score

      78. How and when will the baselines be defined?

      <--- Score

      79. Do the problem and goal statements meet the SMART criteria (specific, measurable, attainable, relevant, and time-bound)?

      <--- Score

      80. What is in scope?

      <--- Score

      81. How did the Data philanthropy manager receive input to the development of a Data philanthropy improvement plan and the estimated completion dates/times of each activity?

      <--- Score

      82. How do you manage unclear Data philanthropy requirements?

      <--- Score

      83. Has a project plan, Gantt chart, or similar been developed/completed?

      <--- Score

      84. What are the tasks and definitions?

      <--- Score

      85. Has a high-level ‘as is’ process map been completed, verified and validated?

      <--- Score

      86. How would you define Data philanthropy leadership?

      <--- Score

      87. What system do you use for gathering Data philanthropy information?

      <--- Score

      88. What sources do you use to gather information for a Data philanthropy study?

      <--- Score

      89. Are roles and responsibilities formally defined?

      <--- Score

      90. What is the scope of the Data philanthropy work?

      <--- Score

      91. How do you gather requirements?

      <--- Score

      92. Has anyone else (internal or external to the group) attempted to solve this problem or a similar one before? If so, what knowledge can be leveraged from these previous efforts?

      <--- Score

      93. Is there a clear Data philanthropy case definition?

      <--- Score

      94. Have all basic functions of Data philanthropy been defined?

      <--- Score

      95. What gets examined?

      <--- Score

      96. What sort of initial information to gather?

      <--- Score

      97. Is the current ‘as is’ process being followed? If not, what are the discrepancies?

      <--- Score

      98. Is there a completed SIPOC representation, describing the Suppliers, Inputs, Process, Outputs, and Customers?

      <--- Score

      99. How do you build the right business case?

      <--- Score

      100. Are the Data philanthropy requirements complete?

      <--- Score

      101. What are the record-keeping requirements of Data philanthropy activities?

      <--- Score

      102. Has the direction changed at all during the course of Data philanthropy? If so, when did it change and why?

      <--- Score

      103. How do you hand over Data philanthropy context?

      <--- Score

      104. What customer feedback methods were used to solicit their input?

      <--- Score

      105. What are the Data philanthropy tasks and definitions?

      <--- Score

      106. The political context: who holds power?

      <--- Score

      107. Who is gathering Data philanthropy information?

      <--- Score

      108. Who defines (or who defined) the rules and roles?

      <--- Score

      109. Is the Data philanthropy scope complete and appropriately sized?

      <--- Score

      110. What are the core elements of the Data philanthropy business case?

      <--- Score

      111. Is it clearly defined in and to your organization what you do?

      <--- Score

      112. What defines best in class?

      <--- Score

      113. Are task requirements clearly defined?

      <--- Score

      114. Have all of the relationships been defined properly?

      <--- Score

      115. What are the boundaries of the scope? What is in bounds and what is not? What is the start point? What is the stop point?

      <--- Score

      116. If substitutes have been appointed, have they been briefed on the Data philanthropy goals and received regular communications as to the progress to date?

      <--- Score

      117. What information do you gather?

      <--- Score

      118. Are resources adequate for the scope?

      <--- Score

      119. How will the Data philanthropy team and the group measure complete success of Data philanthropy?

      <--- Score

      120. What are (control) requirements for Data philanthropy Information?

      <--- Score

      121. What constraints exist that might impact the team?

      <--- Score

      122. Does the scope remain the same?

      <--- Score

      123. Is Data philanthropy linked to key stakeholder goals and objectives?

      <--- Score

      124. What are the dynamics of the communication plan?

      <--- Score

      125. How do you think the partners involved in Data philanthropy would have defined success?

      <--- Score

      126. How are consistent Data philanthropy definitions important?

      <--- Score

      127. What would be the goal or target for a Data philanthropy’s