Process Thinking A Complete Guide - 2020 Edition. Gerardus Blokdyk

elements of the Process Thinking business case?

      <--- Score

      74. How often are the team meetings?

      <--- Score

      75. Are all requirements met?

      <--- Score

      76. Is full participation by members in regularly held team meetings guaranteed?

      <--- Score

      77. How do you think the partners involved in Process Thinking would have defined success?

      <--- Score

      78. When are meeting minutes sent out? Who is on the distribution list?

      <--- Score

      79. How do you keep key subject matter experts in the loop?

      <--- Score

      80. Have all basic functions of Process Thinking been defined?

      <--- Score

      81. Have all of the relationships been defined properly?

      <--- Score

      82. How and when will the baselines be defined?

      <--- Score

      83. How do you manage scope?

      <--- Score

      84. How would you define the culture at your organization, how susceptible is it to Process Thinking changes?

      <--- Score

      85. Are there any constraints known that bear on the ability to perform Process Thinking work? How is the team addressing them?

      <--- Score

      86. Is it clearly defined in and to your organization what you do?

      <--- Score

      87. Is there regularly 100% attendance at the team meetings? If not, have appointed substitutes attended to preserve cross-functionality and full representation?

      <--- Score

      88. Is the scope of Process Thinking defined?

      <--- Score

      89. Is the Process Thinking scope complete and appropriately sized?

      <--- Score

      90. Is Process Thinking linked to key stakeholder goals and objectives?

      <--- Score

      91. What constraints exist that might impact the team?

      <--- Score

      92. How do you manage changes in Process Thinking requirements?

      <--- Score

      93. Is there a completed, verified, and validated high-level ‘as is’ (not ‘should be’ or ‘could be’) stakeholder process map?

      <--- Score

      94. Is the team sponsored by a champion or stakeholder leader?

      <--- Score

      95. Who defines (or who defined) the rules and roles?

      <--- Score

      96. Do the problem and goal statements meet the SMART criteria (specific, measurable, attainable, relevant, and time-bound)?

      <--- Score

      97. What are the Roles and Responsibilities for each team member and its leadership? Where is this documented?

      <--- Score

      98. What are the compelling stakeholder reasons for embarking on Process Thinking?

      <--- Score

      99. Who is gathering Process Thinking information?

      <--- Score

      100. The political context: who holds power?

      <--- Score

      101. When is/was the Process Thinking start date?

      <--- Score

      102. Has a high-level ‘as is’ process map been completed, verified and validated?

      <--- Score

      103. Is Process Thinking required?

      <--- Score

      104. How do you gather requirements?

      <--- Score

      105. In what way can you redefine the criteria of choice clients have in your category in your favor?

      <--- Score

      106. What are the boundaries of the scope? What is in bounds and what is not? What is the start point? What is the stop point?

      <--- Score

      107. Will team members perform Process Thinking work when assigned and in a timely fashion?

      <--- Score

      108. Has the improvement team collected the ‘voice of the customer’ (obtained feedback – qualitative and quantitative)?

      <--- Score

      109. How do you manage unclear Process Thinking requirements?

      <--- Score

      110. How does the Process Thinking manager ensure against scope creep?

      <--- Score

      111. What is the scope of Process Thinking?

      <--- Score

      112. Is the Process Thinking scope manageable?

      <--- Score

      113. Do you have organizational privacy requirements?

      <--- Score

      114. Is there a clear Process Thinking case definition?

      <--- Score

      115. Are different versions of process maps needed to account for the different types of inputs?

      <--- Score

      116. How is the team tracking and documenting its work?

      <--- Score

      117. Is the team equipped with available and reliable resources?

      <--- Score

      118. Are resources adequate for the scope?

      <--- Score

      119. What key stakeholder process output measure(s) does Process Thinking leverage and how?

      <--- Score

      120. Has a Process Thinking requirement not been met?

      <--- Score

      121. What customer feedback methods were used to solicit their input?

      <--- Score

      122. Has everyone on the team, including the team leaders, been properly trained?

      <--- Score

      123. How will the Process Thinking team and the group measure complete success of Process Thinking?

      <--- Score

      124. What system do you use for gathering Process Thinking information?

      <--- Score

      125. Have the customer needs been translated into specific, measurable requirements? How?

      <--- Score

      126. Does the team have regular meetings?

      <--- Score

      127. What happens if Process Thinking’s scope changes?

      <--- Score

      128. Are improvement team members fully trained on Process Thinking?