Kant's Critique of Judgement. Immanuel Kant

tion>

       Immanuel Kant

      Kant's Critique of Judgement

      Published by Good Press, 2019

       [email protected]

      EAN 4057664114778

Table of Contents

       EDITOR’S INTRODUCTION

       GLOSSARY OF KANT’S PHILOSOPHICAL TERMS

       PREFACE

       INTRODUCTION

       I. OF THE DIVISION OF PHILOSOPHY

       II. OF THE REALM OF PHILOSOPHY IN GENERAL

       III. OF THE CRITIQUE OF JUDGEMENT AS A MEANS OF COMBINING THE TWO PARTS OF PHILOSOPHY INTO A WHOLE.

       IV. OF JUDGEMENT AS A FACULTY LEGISLATING A PRIORI

       V. THE PRINCIPLE OF THE FORMAL PURPOSIVENESS OF NATURE IS A TRANSCENDENTAL PRINCIPLE OF JUDGEMENT.

       VI. OF THE COMBINATION OF THE FEELING OF PLEASURE WITH THE CONCEPT OF THE PURPOSIVENESS OF NATURE.

       VII. OF THE AESTHETICAL REPRESENTATION OF THE PURPOSIVENESS OF NATURE.

       VIII. OF THE LOGICAL REPRESENTATION OF THE PURPOSIVENESS OF NATURE

       IX. OF THE CONNEXION OF THE LEGISLATION OF UNDERSTANDING WITH THAT OF REASON BY MEANS OF THE JUDGEMENT

       THE CRITIQUE OF JUDGEMENT

       PART I CRITIQUE OF THE AESTHETICAL JUDGEMENT

       FIRST DIVISION ANALYTIC OF THE AESTHETICAL JUDGEMENT

       SECOND BOOK ANALYTIC OF THE SUBLIME

       SECOND DIVISION DIALECTIC OF THE AESTHETICAL JUDGEMENT

       THE CRITIQUE OF JUDGEMENT

       PART II CRITIQUE OF THE TELEOLOGICAL JUDGEMENT

       FIRST DIVISION ANALYTIC OF THE TELEOLOGICAL JUDGEMENT

       SECOND DIVISION DIALECTIC OF THE TELEOLOGICAL JUDGEMENT

       METHODOLOGY OF THE TELEOLOGICAL JUDGEMENT. 119

       WORKS ON PHILOSOPHY

EDITOR’S INTRODUCTION

       Table of Contents

      There are not wanting indications that public interest in the Critical Philosophy has been quickened of recent days in these countries, as well as in America. To lighten the toil of penetrating through the wilderness of Kant’s long sentences, the English student has now many aids, which those who began their studies fifteen or twenty years ago did not enjoy. Translations, paraphrases, criticisms, have been published in considerable numbers; so that if it is not yet true that “he who runs may read,” it may at least be said that a patient student of ordinary industry and intelligence has his way made plain before him. And yet the very number of aids is dangerous. Whatever may be the value of short and easy handbooks in other departments of science, it is certain that no man will become a philosopher, no man will even acquire a satisfactory knowledge of the history of philosophy, without personal and prolonged study of the ipsissima verba of the great masters of human thought. “Above all,” said Schopenhauer, “my truth-seeking young friends, beware of letting our professors tell you what is contained in the Critique of the Pure Reason”; and the advice has not become less wholesome with the lapse of years. The fact, however, that many persons have not sufficient familiarity with German to enable them to study German Philosophy in the original with ease, makes translations an educational necessity; and this translation of Kant’s Critique of the faculty of Judgement has been undertaken in the hope that it may promote a more general study of that masterpiece. If any reader wishes to follow Schopenhauer’s advice, he has only to omit the whole of this prefatory matter and proceed at once to the Author’s laborious Introduction.

      It is somewhat surprising that the Critique of Judgement has never yet been made accessible to the English reader. Dr. Watson has indeed translated a few selected passages, so also has Dr. Caird in his valuable account of the Kantian philosophy, and I have found their renderings of considerable service; but the space devoted by both writers to the Critique of Judgement is very small in comparison with that given to the Critiques of Pure and Practical Reason. And yet the work is not an unimportant one. Kant himself regarded it as the coping-stone of his critical edifice; it even formed the point of departure for his successors, Fichte, Schelling and Hegel, in the construction of their respective systems. Possibly the reason of its comparative neglect lies in its repulsive style. Kant was never careful of style, and in his later years he became more and more enthralled by those technicalities and refined distinctions which deter so many from the Critical Philosophy even in its earlier sections. These “symmetrical architectonic amusements,” as Schopenhauer called them, encumber every page of Kant’s later writings, and they are a constant source of embarrassment to his unhappy translator. For, as every translator knows, no single word in one language exactly covers any single word in another; and yet if Kant’s distinctions are to be preserved it is necessary to select with more or less arbitrariness English equivalents for German technical terms, and retain them all through. Instances of this will be given later on; I only remark here on the fact that Kant’s besetting sin of over-technicality is especially conspicuous in this treatise.

      Another fault—an old fault of Kant—apparent after reading even a few pages, is that repetitions are very frequent of the same thought in but slightly varied language. Arguments are repeated over and over again until they become quite wearisome; and then when the reader’s attention has flagged, and he is glancing cursorily down the page, some important new point is introduced without emphasis, as if the author were really anxious to keep his meaning to himself at all hazards. A book written in such fashion rarely