Ошибки в оценке науки, или как правильно использовать библиометрию. Ив Жэнгра

Narin, Evaluative Bibliometrics. The Use of Publication and Citation Analysis in the Evaluation of Scientific Activity (Cherry Hill, N. J.: Computer Horizons Inc., 1976).

      27

      Ghislaine Filliatreau (dir.), Indicateurs de sciences et de technologies, rapport de l’Observatoire des sciences et techniques (Paris: Économica, 2010).

      28

      Yehuda Elkana, Joshua Lederberg, Robert K. Merton, Arnold Thackray & Harriet Zuckerman (éd.), Toward a Metric of Science. The Advent of Science Indicators (New York: John Wiley & Sons, 1978).

      29

      Gerald Holton, “Can science be measured?”, in Y. Elkana et al., op. cit., pp. 39–68; Stephen Cole, Jonathan R. Cole & Lorraine Dietrich, “Measuring the cognitive state of scientific disciplines,” idem, ibidem, pp. 209–252; Eugene Garfield, Morton V. Malin et Henry Small, “Citation data as science indicators,” idem, ibidem, pp. 179–207.

      30

      См.: Y. Gingras, Sociologie des sciences (Paris: PUF, 2013), pp. 5–6.

      31

      См.: T. D. Wilson, “The nonsense of ‘knowledge management’,” Information Research, 8, octobre 2002, article no 144, http://InformationR.net/ir/8–1/paper144.html.

      32

      См.: Isabelle Bruno et Emmanuel Didier, Benchmarking: L’État sous pression statistique (Paris: La Découverte, 2013).

      33

      См.: Éric Archambault, David Campbell, Yves Gingras & Vincent Larivière, “Comparing bibliometric statistics obtained from the Web of Science and Scopus,” in Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 60, 2009, pp. 1320–1326.

      34

      См.: Keith Pavitt, “Patent statistics as indicators of innovative activities: possibilities and problems,” in Scientometrics, 7, 1985, pp. 77–99.

      35

      См.: Francis Narin, Dominic Olivastro, “Linkage between patents and papers: An interim EPO/US comparison,” in Scientometrics, 41, 1998, pp. 51–59.

      36

      См. переписку между Гарфилдом и социологом Гарриет Цукерман (Harriet Zuckerman) в: P. Wouters, “The citation culture,” op. cit., p. 102.

      37

      Eugene Garfield, Irving H. Sher & Richard J. Torpie, “The use of citation data in writing the history of science,” in Institute for Scientific Information, décembre 1964; Eugene Garfield, “From the science of science to scientometrics: visualizing the history of science with HistCite software,” in Journal of Informetrics, 3, 2009, pp. 173–179.

      38

      Henry Small, Physics Citation Index, 1920–1929, Philadelphie, ISI, 2 vols, 1981; “Recapturing physics in the 1920s through citation analysis,” in Czechoslovak Journal of Physics, 36, 1986, pp. 142–147.

      39

      http://wokinfo.com/products_tools/backfiles/coss/, http://wokinfo.com/products_tools/backfiles/cos/.

      40

      См.: Eugene Garfield & Irving H. Sher, “New factors in the evaluation of scientific literature through citation indexing,” in American Documentation, 14, 1963, pp. 195–201.

      41

      См.: Vincent Larivière, Benoît Macaluso, Éric Archambault & Yves Gingras, “Which scientific elites? On the concentration of research funds, publications and citations,” in Research Evaluation, 19, 2010, pp. 45–53.

      42

      См.: Alan E. Bayer & John K. Folger, “Some correlates of a citation measure of productivity in science,” in Sociology of Education, 39, 1966, pp. 381–390.

      43

      Eugene Garfield, Irving H. Sher, “New tools for improving and evaluating the effectiveness of research,” in M. C. Yovits, D. M. Gilford, R. H. Wilcox, E. Staveley and H. D. Lemer (dir.), Research Program Effectiveness, Proceedings of the Conference Sponsored by the Office of Naval Research Washington, D. C., July 27–29, 1965 (New York: Gordon and Breach, 1966), pp. 135–146. Текст доступен в интернете: http://www.garfield.library.upenn.edu/papers/onrpaper.html.

      44

      Jonathan R. Cole, Stephen Cole, Social Stratification in Science (Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1973).

      45

      См.: Perry W. Wilson et Edwin B. Fred, “The growth curve of a scientific literature,” in Scientific Monthly, 41, 1935, pp. 240–250.

      46

      См.: Jack H. Westbrook, “Identifying significant research,” in Science, 132, 28 October, 1960, pp. 1229–1234.

      47

      J. C. Fisher, “Basic research in industry,” in Science, 129, 19 June, 1959, pp. 1653–1657.

      48

      См.: G. Nigel Gilbert, “Measuring the growth of science. A review of indicators of scientific growth,” in Scientometrics, 1, 1978, pp. 9–34.

      49

      См.: Francis Narin, “Patent bibliometrics,” in Scientometrics, 30, 1994, pp. 147–155.

      50

      См.: P. W. Hart, J. T. Sommerfeld, “Relationship between growth in gross domestic product (GDP) and growth in the chemical engineering literature in five different countries,” Scientometrics, 42, 1998, pp. 299–311.

      51

      См.: Vincent Larivière, Éric Archambault, Yves Gingras, Étienne Vignola – Gagné, “The lace of serials in referencing practices: comparing natural sciences and engineering with social sciences and humanities,” in Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 57, June 2006, pp. 997–1004.

      52

      См.: Elisabeth S. Clemens, Walter W. Powell, Kris McIlwaine, Dina Okamoto, “Careers in print: books, journals, and scholarly reputations,” in American Journal of Sociology, 101, 1995, pp. 433–494.

      53

      См.: Michael M. Kessler, “Bibliographic coupling between scientific papers,” in American Documentation, 14, 1963, pp. 10–25.

      54

      См.: Henry Small, “Co-citation in scientific literature: A new measure of relationship between two documents,” in Journal of the American Society for Information Science, 24, 1973, pp. 265–269.