Название | The World as Will and Idea (Vol. 3 of 3) |
---|---|
Автор произведения | Артур Шопенгауэр |
Жанр | Философия |
Серия | |
Издательство | Философия |
Год выпуска | 0 |
isbn |
Конец ознакомительного фрагмента.
Текст предоставлен ООО «ЛитРес».
Прочитайте эту книгу целиком, купив полную легальную версию на ЛитРес.
Безопасно оплатить книгу можно банковской картой Visa, MasterCard, Maestro, со счета мобильного телефона, с платежного терминала, в салоне МТС или Связной, через PayPal, WebMoney, Яндекс.Деньги, QIWI Кошелек, бонусными картами или другим удобным Вам способом.
1
This chapter is connected with the last half of § 27 of the first volume.
2
De Augm. Scient., L. vi. c. 3.
3
This chapter is connected with § 23 of the first volume.
4
This chapter and the following one are connected with § 28 of the first volume.
5
Let me here remark in passing that, judging from the German literature since Kant, one would necessarily believe that Hume's whole wisdom had consisted in his obviously false scepticism with regard to the law of causality, for this alone is everywhere referred to. In order to know Hume one must read his “Natural History of Religion” and his “Dialogues on Natural Religion.” There one sees him in his greatness, and these, together with Essay 21 “Of National Characters,” are the writings on account of which – I know of nothing that says more for his fame – even to the present day, he is everywhere hated by the English clergy.
6
This chapter is connected with § 29 of the first volume.
7
In the Siècle, 10th April 1859, there appears, very beautifully written, the story of a squirrel that was magically drawn by a serpent into its very jaws: “Un voyageur qu
1
This chapter is connected with the last half of § 27 of the first volume.
2
3
This chapter is connected with § 23 of the first volume.
4
This chapter and the following one are connected with § 28 of the first volume.
5
Let me here remark in passing that, judging from the German literature since Kant, one would necessarily believe that Hume's whole wisdom had consisted in his obviously false scepticism with regard to the law of causality, for this alone is everywhere referred to. In order to know Hume one must read his “Natural History of Religion” and his “Dialogues on Natural Religion.” There one sees him in his greatness, and these, together with Essay 21 “Of National Characters,” are the writings on account of which – I know of nothing that says more for his fame – even to the present day, he is everywhere hated by the English clergy.
6
This chapter is connected with § 29 of the first volume.
7
In the
8
“