Human Being Theory. For Dummies. Jacob Feldman

the Looking Glassby Lewis Carroll

      What is the difference between myth, religion and science? To answer this question I collected evidences.

      1) Is there canonical texts?

      2) Are there professionals?

      3) What about authorship?

      See answers in the table.

      Fig.24. Canon, professionals, authorship

      I suppose that these different features are outer manifestation of specific inner activity.

      I suppose that the most valuable information in society circulates inside special hierarchies. There are three kinds of positions in such hierarchies: authors, translators, and consumers.

      Fig.25. Authors, translators, and consumers

      There are no professionals in the myth circulating.

      There are no authors in religion (that’s why they need God as a Creator),

      but there are authors in science.

      It means that myth and religion (for some reason) do not use some parts of the hierarchy.

      Fig.26. Myth, religion, science

      Disclaimer. Pair «knowledge vs. faith» makes us to distinguish between consumers of science and consumers of religion. And this is bad idea.

      Do not compare consumers of different kinds. They are very similar. Compare science, religion and myth as a systems.

      Fig.27. Inside philosophy

      3.Main model: levels of mind

      Every model is a Heaven’s gift

      «If it moves, salute it.

      If it doesn’t move, pick it up.

      If you can’t pick it up, paint it.»

US Military saying

      Fig.28. Authors, translators, and consumers

      Look at the picture and believe what I’m saying. There is one translator per one hundred consumers. There is one author per one hundred translators. There is one great idea per one hundred authors per generation. There is one author-made solid model per one hundred author-made great ideas. There are almost 10 000 000 000 human beings at the planet now. So we could expect 10 solid models being invented by one generation.

      In this book, I present two solid models.

      First model is called Levels-of-Mind Theory. It occupies 80% of the book. First version of the model was presented in Moscow in 1989, in Jerusalem and Toronto in 1994. But probably it was too early for humankind to understand that. The model went to attic to sleep. In 2005, one Moscow publisher (Alexey Trekhov, R.I.P.) helped me to make a book. In 2007, one smart reader of the book told me that my model has some common features with Spiral Dynamics (ask Google what it is).

      Second model was called Personality Card. But because it contains description of Task Card and Rating, now I call it Big Triplet. I did it in 2011. It occupies last 20% of the book.

      Aristotle was sure that Earth and Heavens couldn’t be described in the same language.

      Galileo Galilei was not agree with him.

      Isaac Newton made this unified language for Earth and Heavens.

      Today many people believe that for every problem of human being we need specific language. I enumerated 7+12—1=18 areas pretending to have such specific language. Not taking in account pluralism inside of every area. But I believe that unified language for all human being problems could be created.

      This creating is mission of my life.

      Levels-of-Mind Theory

      «But I don’t want to go among mad people,» Alice remarked.

      «Oh, you ca’n’t help that,» said the Cat:

      ’we’re all mad here. I’m mad. You’re mad.»

Alice’s Adventures in Wonderlandby Lewis Carrol

      Dealing with triplet Model, Mapping, Problem we start with model itself. On this stage, you can think of working with model as if playing new cards game.

      No mapping for now, just playing game. Mapping and practical real-life problems will come later.

      The model has 8 elements or Levels, you can think of them like of cards from 1 to 8

      Fig.29. 1 to 8

      Sometimes I will use Level 9. I behaves like a Joker,

      being able to replace every other card when it is needed.

      Fig.30. 9 is a joker

      Fig.31. Four situation

      Now we will consider four different games:

      1) Person to Task

      2) Person to Person

      3) Person to Group

      4) Group to Group

      Every game has its own set of rules.

      Person to Task game

      «How do you know I’m mad?» said Alice.

      «You must be,» said the Cat, ’or you wouldn’t have come here.»

Alice’s Adventures in Wonderlandby Lewis Carrol

      In this game, both sides choose a card randomly.

      Person chooses one cars from 1 to 9 of red suit.

      Task chooses one card from 1 to 8 of black suit.

      If rank of the cards on both sides is equal, both sides win.

      If person has 9 both sides win.

      Else, both sides lose.

      Fig.32. Person to task

      Person to Group game

      «I should like to have it explained,» said the Mock Turtle. «She ca’n’t explain it,» said the Gryphon hastily «Go on with the next verse’.

Alice’s Adventures in Wonderlandby Lewis Carrol

      Person choose one card from 1 to 9 of red suit. Group chooses a set of card of one black suit.

      If in the set there exists one card with the same rank as red card, both sides win.

      If