Название | Statistical Analysis with Excel For Dummies |
---|---|
Автор произведения | Joseph Schmuller |
Жанр | Программы |
Серия | |
Издательство | Программы |
Год выпуска | 0 |
isbn | 9781119844563 |
Determine central tendency and variability
Work with standard scores
Understand and visualize normal distributions
Chapter 3
Show-and-Tell: Graphing Data
IN THIS CHAPTER
Introducing graphs
Working with Excel’s graphics capabilities
Adding Sparklines
The visual presentation of data is extremely important in statistics. Visual presentation enables you to discern relationships and trends you might not see if you look only at numbers. Visual presentation helps in another way: It’s valuable for presenting ideas to groups and making them understand your point of view.
Graphs come in many varieties. In this chapter, I explore the types of graphs you use in statistics and explain when it’s advisable to use them. I also show you how to use Excel to create those graphs.
Why Use Graphs?
Suppose you have to make a pitch to a Congressional committee about commercial space revenues in the early 1990s.
Which would you rather present: the data in Table 3-1 or the graph in Figure 3-1, which shows the same data? (The data, by the way, is from the US Department of Commerce, via the Statistical Abstract of the US.)
TABLE 3-1 US Commercial Space Revenues 1990–1994 (in Millions of Dollars)
Industry | 1990 | 1991 | 1992 | 1993 | 1994 |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Commercial Satellites Delivered | 1,000 | 1,300 | 1,300 | 1,100 | 1,400 |
Satellite Services | 800 | 1,200 | 1,500 | 1,850 | 2,330 |
Satellite Ground Equipment | 860 | 1,300 | 1,400 | 1,600 | 1,970 |
Commercial Launches | 570 | 380 | 450 | 465 | 580 |
Remote Sensing Data | 155 | 190 | 210 | 250 | 300 |
Commercial R&D Infrastructure | 0 | 0 | 0 | 30 | 60 |
Total | 3,385 | 4,370 | 4,860 | 5,295 | 6,640 |
Data from U.S. Department of Commerce
FIGURE 3-1: Graphing the data in Table 3-1.
Which one would have a greater and more lasting impact? Although the table is certainly informative, most people would argue that the graph gets the point across better and more memorably. (Eyes that glaze over when looking at numbers often shine brighter when looking at pictures.)
The graph shows you trends you might not see as quickly on the table. (Satellite services rose fastest. Commercial launches, not so much.) Bottom line: Tables are good; graphs are better.
Graphs help bring concepts to life that might otherwise be difficult to understand. In fact, I do that throughout the book. I illustrate points by, well, illustrating points!
Examining Some Fundamentals
First of all, Excel uses the word chart instead of graph. Like the graph, er, chart in Figure 3-1, most chart formats have a horizontal axis and a vertical axis. Several other formats (pie, treemap, and sunburst), which I show you later in this chapter, do not. Neither the radar chart nor the box-and-whisker chart (which also appear in this chapter) has a horizontal axis.
By convention, the horizontal axis is also called the x-axis, and the vertical axis is also called the y-axis.
Also, by convention, what goes on the horizontal axis is called the independent variable, and what goes on the vertical axis is called the dependent variable. One of Excel’s chart formats reverses that convention, and I bring that to your attention when I cover it. Just to give you a heads-up, Excel calls that reversed-axis format a bar chart. You might have seen the chart shown in Figure 3-1 referred to as a bar chart. So have I. (Actually, I’ve seen it referred to as a bar graph, but never mind that.) Excel calls Figure 3-1 a column chart, so I say columns from now on.
Getting back to independent and dependent, these terms imply that changes in the vertical direction depend (at least partly) on changes in the horizontal direction.
Another fundamental principle of creating a chart: Don’t wear out the viewer’s eyes! If you put too much into a chart in the way of information or special effects, you defeat the whole purpose of the chart.
For example, in Figure 3-1, I had to make some choices about filling in the columns. Color coded columns would have been helpful, but the page you’re looking at shows only black, white, and shades of gray.
A lot of chart creation skill comes with experience, and you just have to use your judgment. In this case, my judgment came into play with the horizontal gridlines. In most charts, I prefer not to have them. Here, they seem to add structure and help the viewer figure out the dollar value associated with each column. But then again, that’s just my opinion.
Gauging Excel's Graphics (Chartics?) Capabilities