Planet Formation and Panspermia. Группа авторов

than its past, this means that from a four-dimensional, spatiotemporal point of view, directed panspermia is the main source of life. (“Is” here pertains to the timeless existence, not to the conventional present tense, since human languages have not evolved to enable adequate discussion of the four-dimensional view and other deep metaphysical issues.) Larger here means not only in terms of accessible volume but also in terms of the available design space. Even if past biospheres were limited to Earthlike planets only, future biospheres will not be. Instead, we have strong rationale to expect huge and probably inconceivable diversity of possible habitats. Hence, contrary to our intuitions, it might be the case that advanced life is also, in the fullness of time, a precondition for simple life.¹²

      A common misperception about general theses like the continuity thesis—or indeed Copernicanism or the anthropic principle(s)—is that they contain or imply teleological elements. A superficial reflection is sufficient to establish that it is not the case. If anything, the continuity thesis implies a strongly disteleological view of the major evolutionary transitions: there is no mystical force leading to “jumps” over the low-probability gaps, since in reality, there are no such gaps. However, we shall always keep in mind that it is a useful heuristic and not some mandatory “law”: if it turns out that life and intelligence are very rare in the universe for some reason, we shall have empirical reasons to doubt the validity of the continuity thesis. Clearly, as with any other useful philosophical principle in science, this is an additional motivation, rather than an impediment, for further search and study.

One consequence of the ideas outlined in this chapter is that their future development will likely lead to gradual dissolution of the very concept of habitability, which has emerged as the central concept of astrobiology in the course of the last (roughly) 20 years. If advanced biotechnology enables planting Dyson trees on Kuiper Belt objects by future humans, or if some postbiological civilization successfully seeds atmospheres of gas giants with life, these instances of directed panspermia will obviate the constrains inherent in the very notion of habitability. The situation is further complicated by the reasonable expectation that, if seeding occurred in the sufficiently distant past, it may be very hard or impossible to verify for rather unsophisticated observers such as the present-day or near-future human astrobiologists. (Notice the interesting asymmetry: engaging in directed panspermia in practice seems to be easier than actually verifying whether a biosphere is the product of such intentional activity or an entirely naturalistic evolution in situ. We could launch “soda cans with microbes” toward other planets effectively tomorrow, while to find and prove local origin of another planetary biosphere seems to be a task for another century if not millennium. Whether this asymmetry is a reason to worry about ethical and legal aspects of directed panspermia is an interesting challenge outside of the scope of the present chapter.)

      Such a development should not unduly worry us at present for several reasons. First, it is certainly not an immediate prospect. More important, however, is the history-tested conclusion that all theoretical concepts in empirical science have limited lifetime, as our theories are continuously improving and each particular framework is being substituted by an explanatorily better or a more efficient one. Habitability is an immensely useful concept for these early days of astrobiology and it is likely to remain so for decades to come, but we should be aware that it is largely constrained by our anthropocentric and geocentric viewpoint; calls for overcoming the latter can already be heard [3.40]. Not rejecting, but transcending the present-day understanding of habitability will be one of the clearest proofs of progress, and indeed the greatest triumph of future astrobiology.

Acknowledgements

Useful comments of an anonymous referee are hereby acknowledged. The author wishes to thank Ksenija Petrović, Adrian Lenardic, Amedeo Balbi, Ana Katić, Anders Sandberg, George Dvorsky, John Smart, Slobodan Perović, Karl Schroeder, Ana Roljević, Aleksandar Obradović, Milan Stojanović, Goran Milovanović, Srdja Janković, the late Damian Veal, and the Editors who offered helpful suggestions and pleasant conversations on the related topics. Dušan Pavlović has kindly helped in obtaining some of the literature. South Korean rock diva Jihae is acknowledged for providing musical inspiration during the work on this chapter.

References

      [3.1] Adams, M.B., Last Judgement: The Visionary Biology of J. B. S. Haldane. J. Hist. Biol., 33, 457–491, 2000.

      [3.2] Adams, F.C. and Laughlin, G., A dying universe: the long-term fate and evolution of astrophysical objects. Rev. Mod. Phys., 69, 337–372, 1997.

      [3.3] Aristotle, Ethics, 1984 (transl. by J.A.K. Thompson), Penguin, London. [3.4] Arlazorov, M.S., Konstantin Tsiolkovsky: Russian scientist, Encyclopædia Britannica, Inc. 2020, https://www.britannica.com/biography/Konstantin-Eduardovich-Tsiolkovsky.

      [3.5] Armstrong, S. and Sandberg, A., Eternity in six hours: Intergalactic spreading of intelligent life and sharpening the Fermi paradox. Acta Astronaut., 89, 1–13, 2013.

      [3.6] Balashov, Y., Uniformitarianism in Cosmology: Background and Philosophical Implications of the Steady-State Theory. Stud. Hist. Philos. Sci., 25B, 933–958, 1994.

      [3.7] Balbi, A., Why we should take interstellar panspermia seriously, in: Planet Formation and Panspermia: New Prospects for the Movement of Life through Space [PNSP, Volume in the series Astrobiology Perspectives on Life of the Universe], R. Gordon and J. Seckbach (Series Eds.), In preparation, B. Vukotić, J. Seckbach, R. Gordon (Eds.), Wiley-Scrivener, Beverly, Massachusetts, USA, 2020, Accepted, This volume.

      [3.8] Beech, M., Gordon, R., Seckbach, J. (Eds.), Terraforming Mars [TMRS, Volume in the series Astrobiology Perspectives on Life of the Universe], R. Gordon and J. Seckbach (Eds.), in preparation, Wiley-Scrivener, Beverly, Massachusetts, USA, 2021.

      [3.9] Behroozi, P. and Peeples, M.S., On the history and future of cosmic planet formation. Mon. Notices R. Astron. Soc., 454, 1811–1817, 2015.

      [3.10] Bondi, H. and Gold, T., The Steady-State Theory of the Expanding Universe. Mon. Notices R. Astron. Soc., 108, 252–270, 1948.

      [3.11] Bostrom, N., Superintelligence: Paths, Dangers, Strategies, Oxford University Press, Oxford, 2014.

      [3.12] Chopra, A. and Lineweaver, C.H., The case for a Gaian bottleneck: the biology of habitability. Astrobiology, 16, 7–22, 2016.

      [3.13] Ćirković, M.M., The Astrobiological Landscape: Philosophical Foundations of the Study of Cosmic Life, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, 2012.

      [3.14] Ćirković, M.M., The Great Silence: The Science and Philosophy of Fermi’s Paradox, Oxford University Press, Oxford, 2018.

      [3.15] Ćirković, M.M., Into the Artifice of Eternity: Alien Technology and Exploratory Engineering in the Fiction of Lem, Reynolds, and Schroeder, Springer, Cham, 2020, in press.

      [3.16] Ćirković, M.M. and Balbi, A., Copernicanism and the Typicality in Time. Int. J. Astrobiology, 19, 101–109, 2020.

      [3.17] Crick, F.H. and Orgel, L.E., Directed panspermia. Icarus, 19, 341–346, 1973.

      [3.18] Davies, P.C.W., Does life’s rapid appearance imply a Martian origin? Astrobiology, 3, 673–679, 2003.

      [3.19] Dick, S.J., The Biological Universe: The Twentieth-Century Extraterrestrial Life Debate and the Limits of Science, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, 1996.

      [3.20] Dick, S.J., Cultural Evolution, the Postbiological Universe and SETI. Int. J. Astrobiology, 2, 65–74, 2003.

      [3.21] Đošović, V., Vukotić, B., Ćirković, M.M., Advanced aspects of Galactic habitability. Astron. Astrophys., 625, A98, (8pp), 2019.

      [3.22] Dyson, F.J., The search