The History of French Revolution. Taine Hippolyte

Читать онлайн.
Название The History of French Revolution
Автор произведения Taine Hippolyte
Жанр Документальная литература
Серия
Издательство Документальная литература
Год выпуска 0
isbn 4064066397197



Скачать книгу

III. THE CONSTRUCTIONS—THE CONSTITUTION OF 1791.

       I.—Powers of the Central Government.

       II.—The Creation Of Popular Democracy.

       III.—Municipal Kingdoms.

       IV.—On Universal Suffrage.

       V.—The Ruling Minority.

       VI.—Summary of the work of the Constituent Assembly.

       BOOK THIRD. THE APPLICATION OF THE CONSTITUTION. 3101 CHAPTER I.

       I.—The Federations.

       II.—Independence of the municipalities.

       III.—Independent Assemblies.

       CHAPTER II. SOVEREIGNTY OF UNRESTRAINED PASSIONS.

       I.—Old Religious Grudges

       II.—Passion Supreme.

       III.—Egotism of the tax-payer.

       IV.—Cupidity of tenants.

       CHAPTER III. Development of the ruling Passion.

       I.—Attitude of the nobles. Their moderate resistance.

       II.—Workings of the popular imagination with respect to them.

       III.—Domiciliary visits.

       IV.—The nobles obliged to leave the rural districts.

       V.—Persecutions in private life.

       VI.—Conduct of officers.

       VI.—Conduct of the officers.

       VII.—Emigration and its causes.

       VIII.—Attitude of the non-juring priests.

       IX.—General state of opinion.

      PREFACE

       Table of Contents

      This second part of "Les Origines de la France Contemporaine" will consist of two volumes.—Popular insurrections and the laws of the Constituent Assembly end in destroying all government in France; this forms the subject of the present volume.—A party arises around an extreme doctrine, grabs control of the government, and rules in conformity with its doctrine. This will form the subject of the second volume.

      A third volume would be required to criticize and evaluate the source material. I lack the necessary space: I merely state the rule that I have observed. The trustworthiest testimony will always be that of an eyewitness, especially

      * When this witness is an honorable, attentive, and intelligent man,

      * When he is writing on the spot, at the moment, and under the dictate of the facts themselves,

      * When it is obvious that his sole object is to preserve or furnish information,

      * When his work instead of a piece of polemics planned for the needs of a cause, or a passage of eloquence arranged for popular effect is a legal deposition, a secret report, a confidential dispatch, a private letter, or a personal memento.

      The nearer a document approaches this type, the more it merits confidence, and supplies superior material.—I have found many of this kind in the national archives, principally in the manuscript correspondence of ministers, intendants, sub-delegates, magistrates, and other functionaries; of military commanders, officers in the army, and gendarmerie; of royal commissioners, and of the Assembly; of administrators of departments, districts, and municipalities, besides persons in private life who address the King, the National Assembly, or the ministry. Among these are men of every rank, profession, education, and party. They are distributed by hundreds and thousands over the whole surface of the territory. They write apart, without being able to consult each other, and without even knowing each other. No one is so well placed for collecting and transmitting accurate information. None of them seek literary effect, or even imagine that what they write will ever be published. They draw up their statements at once, under the direct impression of local events. Testimony of this character, of the highest order, and at first hand, provides the means by which all other testimony ought to be verified.—The footnotes at the bottom of the pages indicate the condition, office, name, and address of those decisive witnesses. For greater certainty I have transcribed as often as possible their own words. In this way the reader, confronting the texts, can interpret them for himself, and form his own opinions; he will have the same documents as myself for arriving at his conclusions, and, if he is pleased to do so, he may conclude otherwise. As for allusions, if he finds any, he himself will have introduced them, and if he applies them he is alone responsible for them. To my mind, the past has features of its own, and the portrait here presented resembles only the France of the past. I have drawn it without concerning myself with the discussions of the day; I have written as if my subject were the revolutions of Florence or Athens. This is history, and nothing more, and, if I may fully express myself, I esteem my vocation of historian too highly to make a cloak of it for the concealment of another. (December 1877).

       Table of Contents

       Table of Contents

       Table