The Mystery of M. Felix. B. L. Farjeon

of midnight when, tramping half-frozen on his beat, he heard a cry for help. Three times was this cry sent forth into the night, and, faithful guardian as he was, according to his own averment, he endeavored to ascertain the direction from which the appeal proceeded. It may well be believed that, with the wind blowing seemingly from all points of the compass at once, he failed to make the necessary discovery; but it strikes us as singular that when he was talking matters over with Mrs. Middlemore it did not occur to him that the cry for help may have proceeded from the very house in which he was standing. We make no comment upon this singular lapse of memory. It strikes us also as by no means unimportant that in the statements of Mrs. Middlemore and the two constables there is something very like contradiction and confusion. Mrs. Middlemore gives an answer to a question as to her movements in connection with those of the constables, and presently, being pressed to be definite, says something which throws doubt upon her first answer. She excuses herself by saying that she was upset and worried, but to us this explanation is not satisfactory, if only for the reason that her subsequent correction throws doubt upon certain answers given by the two constables to certain questions put to them. However, in the present aspect of the matter, these contradictions may simply point to some dereliction of duty on the part of the constables which they may wish should not be known, and perhaps to some agreement on the part of these three witnesses to an invented story which, believed, would exculpate the constables from any such dereliction. This is mere supposition, and we present it for what it is worth.

      "It is difficult to ascertain the precise time at which Constable Nightingale returned to the house in Gerard Street after his fruitless search for the man who had alarmed Mrs. Middlemore by his sudden rush from the premises. Truly he must have had the greatest difficulty in making his way through the streets. In explanation of our remark that in the statements of Mrs. Middlemore and the two constables there is something very like contradiction and confusion, we append their answers to a few of the questions put to them. We will deal with Constable Nightingale first:

      "'When you left the house in Gerard Street in pursuit of the man what direction did you take?'

      "'I went in the direction of Oxford Street.'

      "'That is, you went to the right?'

      "'Yes.'

      "'Why not to the left?'

      "'That would have led me to Leicester Square and Charing Cross.'

      "'Did you choose the Oxford Street route at haphazard?'

      "'No.'

      "'What induced you to take it?'

      "'I was told by Constable Wigg that the man went that way.'

      "'Did you meet any person on the road?'

      "'No one.'

      "'Absolutely no one?'

      "'Absolutely no one.'

      "'How long were you engaged upon your search for the man?'

      "'I can't exactly fix it.'

      "'May we say an hour?'

      "'That would be near the length of time.'

      "We will now deal with Constable Wigg. He was asked--

      "'How did you summon Constable Nightingale to your assistance?'

      "'I blew my police whistle.'

      "'Many times?'

      "'Not many. He must have been very near.'

      "'But he did not make his appearance immediately?'

      "'No; not immediately.'

      "'Shall we say that two or three minutes elapsed before he joined you?'

      "'About that.'

      "'You explained to him what had occurred?'

      "'Yes, with the assistance of Mrs. Middlemore.'

      "'You both explained it together?'

      "'Well, first one spoke, then the other.'

      "'Did you tell Nightingale that the man had fled in the direction of Oxford Street?'

      "'No.'

      "'In point of fact, you did not see the man come out of the house?'

      "'No.'

      "'And? therefore, could not have given Nightingale the direction?'

      "'No, of course I could not.'

      "Now for Mrs. Middlemore:

      "'When the man rushed by you from the house, you screamed loudly for the police?'

      "'As loud as I could.'

      "'How many times did you call?'

      "'I kep' on calling till Constable Wigg came up.'

      "'He did not come the moment you raised your voice?'

      "'No, not immediate. Per'aps in two or three minutes.'

      "'If we say two minutes we shall be within the mark?'

      "'Yes.'

      "'Did you inform Constable Nightingale that the man ran away in the direction of Oxford Street?'

      "'No; I was so flustered that I didn't see which way he run.'

      "These are all the extracts we need give for the purpose of our illustration, merely asking the reader to bear in mind that each witness was examined without the others being present. Is it quite unreasonable to infer that, had they been examined in each other's presence, their answers would not have been exactly as they are reported in the public prints?

      "Constable Nightingale has since given an explanation of this discrepancy by the admission that he must have made a mistake in supposing that he received from Constable Wigg the information of the route the man took when he scurried off; but we submit that this explanation is not entirely satisfactory.

      "Another thing. Constable Nightingale states that he was engaged in the search for an hour, and that during the whole of that time he did not meet a single person on the road. How is that statement to be received? He was hunting in some of the busiest thoroughfares in London, and it bears the form of an accusation that he did not for a whole hour observe one policeman on his beat. He was on his, he declares, at the time he heard Constable Wigg's whistle. Constable Wigg was on his beat, according to his own declaration, when he blew it. Were they the only two constables in a thronged locality who were faithfully performing their duty? Doubtless the other constables on duty would indignantly repudiate the allegation, but Constable Nightingale distinctly implies as much. We do not wish to be hard on this officer, who bears a good character in the force. His movements and proceedings between the hours of twelve and two on the night of the 16th may have been innocent enough, or, if not quite blameless, excusable enough on such a tempestuous night, but we unhesitatingly say that his evidence is suspicious, and that we are not inclined to accept it as veracious.

      "Still another thing. We have ascertained from persons acquainted with Constable Nightingale, that he was very proud of his silver watch, which he was lucky enough to win in a raffle, and that he was in the habit of boasting that it never stopped, and never lost or gained a minute. It is singular, therefore, that on this eventful night it should have stopped for the first time, and at a time when it might be most important to fix the occurrence of events to a minute. Perhaps Constable Nightingale's watch stopped in sympathy with the stoppage of Mrs. Middlemore's kitchen clock.

      "We are anxious to do justice to the parties, and we hasten to say that at our request they have allowed a competent watchmaker to examine Constable Nightingale's watch and Mrs. Middlemore's clock; but this watchmaker reports that they are in perfect order, and that he can find no reason why they should both have stopped almost at the same moment.

      "If any of our readers consider that we are straining too hard on trifles, we reply that the importance of so-called trifles cannot be over-estimated. The world's greatest poet has said, 'Trifles light as air are in their confirmation