A Complete Guide to Heraldry. Arthur Charles Fox-Davies

Читать онлайн.
Название A Complete Guide to Heraldry
Автор произведения Arthur Charles Fox-Davies
Жанр Языкознание
Серия
Издательство Языкознание
Год выпуска 0
isbn 4057664172358



Скачать книгу

Fig. 96. Fig. 96.—Pallets. Fig. 97. Fig. 97.—The arms of Amaury de Montfort, Earl of Gloucester; died before 1214. (From his seal.) Fig. 98. Fig. 98.—Arms of Simon de Montfort, Earl of Leicester; died 1265. (From MS. Cott., Nero, D. 1.)
Fig. 99. Fig. 99.—Fess. Fig. 100. Fig. 100.—Fess engrailed. Fig. 101. Fig. 101.—Fess invecked.

      The arms shown in Fig. 97 are interesting inasmuch as they are doubtless an early form of the coat per pale indented argent and gules, which is generally described as a banner borne for the honour of Hinckley, by the Simons de Montfort, Earls of Leicester, father and son. In a Roll temp. Henry III., to Simon the younger is ascribed "Le Banner party endentee dargent & de goules," although the arms of both father and son are known to have been as Fig. 98: "Gules, a lion rampant queue-fourchée argent." More probably the indented coat gives the original Montfort arms.

      THE FESS

      The fess is a broad horizontal band crossing the escutcheon in the centre (Fig. 99). It is seldom drawn to contain a full third of the area of the shield. It is subject to the lines of partition (Figs. 100–109).

      A curious variety of the fess dancetté is borne by the Shropshire family Plowden of Plowden. They bear: Azure, a fess dancetté, the upper points terminating in fleurs-de-lis (Fig. 110). A fess couped (Fig. 111) is found in the arms of Lee.

Fig. 102. Fig. 102.—Fess embattled. Fig. 103. Fig. 103.—Fess embattled counter-embattled. Fig. 104. Fig. 104.—Fess raguly.
Fig. 105. Fig. 105.—Fess dovetailed. Fig. 106. Fig. 106.—Fess indented. Fig. 107. Fig. 107.—Fess dancetté.
Fig. 108. Fig. 108.—Fess wavy. Fig. 109. Fig. 109.—Fess nebuly. Fig. 110. Fig. 110.—The arms of Plowden.

      The "fess embattled" is only crenellated upon the upper edge; but when both edges are embattled it is a fess embattled and counter-embattled. The term bretessé (which is said to indicate that the battlements on the upper edge are opposite the battlements on the lower edge, and the indentations likewise corresponding) is a term and a distinction neither of which are regarded in British armory.

      A fess wreathed (Fig. 112) is a bearing which seems to be almost peculiar to the Carmichael family, but the arms of Waye of Devon are an additional example, being: Sable, two bars wreathed argent and gules. I know of no other ordinary borne in a wreathed form, but there seems no reason why this peculiarity should be confined to the fess.

Fig. 111. Fig. 111.—Fess couped. Fig. 112. Fig. 112.—Fess wreathed. Fig. 113. Fig. 113.—Two Bars.
Fig. 114. Fig. 114.—Bars embattled. Fig. 115. Fig. 115.—Bars engrailed. Fig. 116. Fig. 116.—Bars invecked.

      It is a fixed rule of British armory that there can be only one fess upon a shield. If two figures of this character are found they are termed bars (Fig. 113). But it is hardly correct to speak of the bar as a diminutive of the fess, because if two bars only appear on the shield there would be little, if any, diminution made from the width of the fess when depicting the bars. As is the case with other ordinaries, there is much latitude allowed to the artist in deciding the dimensions, it being usually permitted for these to be governed by the charges upon the fess or bars, and the charges between which these are placed.

      Bars, like the fess, are of course equally subject to all the varying lines of partition (Figs. 114–118).

      The diminutive of the bar is the barrulet, which is half its width and double the width of the cottise. But the barrulet will almost invariably be found borne in pairs, when such a pair is usually known as a "bar gemel" and not as two barrulets. Thus a coat with four barrulets would have these placed at equal distances from each other; but a coat with two bars gemel would be depicted with two of its barrulets placed closely together in chief and two placed closely together in base, the disposition being governed by the fact that the two barrulets comprising the "bar gemel" are only one charge. Fig. 119 shows three bars gemel. There is theoretically no limit to the number of bars or bars gemel which can be placed upon the shield. In practical use, however, four will be found the maximum.

Fig. 117. Fig. 117.—Bars raguly. Fig. 118. Fig. 118.—Bars dovetailed. Fig. 119. Fig. 119.—Bars gemel.

      A field composed of four, six, eight, or ten horizontal pieces of equal width is "barry of such and such a number of pieces," the number