Phytomicrobiome Interactions and Sustainable Agriculture. Группа авторов

A.Y., Niu, S.Q., Liu, Y.Z. et al. (2017). Synergistic effects of Bacillus amyloliquefaciens(GB03) and water retaining agent on drought tolerance of perennialryegrass. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 18: 2651.

      51 Washburn, M.P., Wolters, D., and Yates, J.R. III (2001). Large‐scale analysis of the yeast proteome by multidimensional protein identification technology. Nat. Biotechnol. 19 (3): 242–247.

      52 Webb, C.A. and Feller, J.P. (2006). Cereal rust fungi genomics and the pursuit of virulence and avirulence factors. FEMS Microbiol. Lett. 264: 1–7.

      53 Whitham, S.A., Yang, C., and Goodin, M.M. (2006). Global impact: elucidating plant responses to viral infection. Mol. Plant Microbe Interact. 19: 1207–1215.

      54 Wolters, D.A., Washburn, M.P., and Yates, J.R. (2001). An automated multidimensional protein identification technology for shotgun proteomics. Anal. Chem. 73 (23): 5683–5690.

      55 Yajima, W. and Kav, N.N. (2006). The proteome of the phytopathogenic fungus Sclerotinia sclerotiorum. Proteomics 6: 5995–6007.

      56 Zhang, Q., Gao, X., Ren, Y. et al. (2018). Improvement of Verticillium wilt resistance by applying arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi to a cotton variety with high symbiotic efficiency under field conditions. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 19: 241.

3 Metagenomics: An Approach to Unravel the Plant Microbiome and Its Function

       Ravindra Soni1, Deep Chandra Suyal2, Balram Sahu1, and Suresh Chandra Phulara3

       1 Department of Agricultural Microbiology, Indira Gandhi Krishi Vishwavidhyalaya, Raipur, Chhattisgarh, India

       2 Department of Microbiology, Akal College of Basic Sciences, Eternal University, Baru Sahib, Sirmour, Himachal Pradesh, India

       3 Department of Biotechnology, Koneru Lakshmaiah Education Foundation, Guntur, Andhra Pradesh, India

3.1 Introduction

      Like the human body, microbes also colonize inside plants (Qin et al. 2010; Zhao 2010; Gevers et al. 2012). The collective colonization of plant‐associated microbiota is known as a plant microbiome, which is a key determinant governing plant health and its productivity (Berendsen et al. 2012).

      Recent years have seen a remarkable interest in such interactions (Lebeis et al. 2012; Turner et al. 2013). A plant’s internal microbiome, also referred to as endophytic microbes, includes members from almost all microbial communities, such as archaea, bacteria, and fungi (Turner et al. 2013; Hardoim et al. 2015). Sometimes these microbial communities colonize inside plants in such a manner that their number surpasses the number of plant's own cells (Mendes et al. 2013). It is interesting to note that soil microbiomes are now touted as a cornerstone of the next green revolution (Parnell et al. 2016). The concept of soil, microbes, and plant interface, i.e. “soil‐microbe‐plant interface” is not new. However, the “soil‐microbe–soil‐plant–microbe‐plant interface” represents plant microbiome interaction more adequately. The rhizosphere that is affected by several climatic factors influences the plant and microbiome which ultimately utilize the habitat as an information highway (Bais et al. 2004; Roume et al. 2015; Tomer et al. 2017).

A selection effect that is imposed due to the physicochemical changes surrounding roots shapes the microbial composition inside a plant host. One way to this selection is favoring the growth of such opportunistic microbes that are adapted to specific chemical conditions, which is an indirect approach. Alternatively, the microbes that support the growth/development of plants and/or enhance their survival in stress conditions are directly recruited (Bulgarelli et al. 2013; Philippot et al. 2013; Mendes et al. 2014; Suyal et al. 2014). Another habitat where the microbiome interacts with the plant is the rhizoplane, a surface of plant tissues that comes into contact with the soil. Apart from endophytes located inside plant tissues, “epiphytes” is a class of the plant microbiome, which can be found in an adherent form on plant tissues (Bulgarelli et al. 2013). Several studies have explored the structure and function of the microbiome of both model and crop plant species under natural and agricultural environments (Bulgarelli et al. 2012; Rascovan et al. 2016; Hamonts et al. 2018; Kumar et al. 2018a,b). To explore more diversity of plant microbiomes, there is a need to integrate novel molecular technologies, e.g. metagenomics and metatranscriptomics (van der Heijden and Hartmann 2016).

3.2 Metagenomics

      Findings have revealed that a gram of soil contains 10⁹ microbial cells. This exhibits a great diversity level by attaining about 10⁶ taxa. Despite such diversity and number, only 1% of microbes residing in bulk soil and about 10% from plant‐influenced zones can culture in standard laboratory conditions. The majority of the soil microbiome remain uncultured. However, they can be detected using advanced molecular‐based approaches, which are discussed in later sections (Barret et al. 2013). Metagenomics allows the detection of microbial diversity in environmental samples and enables the construction of community‐level gene catalogs (Zengler and Palsson 2012; Franzosa et al. 2015; Guo et al. 2015; Widder et al. 2016). Broadly, metagenomics represents a new advanced approach for genomic analysis. It refers to the simultaneous characterization of genomes in microbial communities from environmental samples, using molecular techniques like PCR, cloning, and DNA sequencing for identifying new sources of plant growth–promoting traits. The approach of metagenomics has also been referred to as environmental genomics, ecogenomics, and community genomics (Song et al. 2013).

Through metagenomics, genomes of organisms in the community can be pooled by entailing the extraction of DNA from the community (Figure 3.1).

      Usually, metagenomic analysis conducts 16S rRNA or 18 S rRNA gene surveys to observe microbial community composition while also informing the sequencing complexity required to access high levels of metagenome coverage (Tyson et al. 2004; Lauro et al. 2011). Complete sequencing of clones containing phylogenetic anchors can be performed by using sequence‐based metagenomics to indicate the taxonomic group. However, functional metagenomics has identified antibiotics (Hover et al. 2018; Wrighton 2018), antibiotic resistance genes (De Castro et al. 2014; López‐Pérez and Mirete 2014), degradative enzymes (Silva et al. 2013; Choi et al. 2018), and plant growth‐promoting traits (Tsurumaru et al. 2015). The clones containing metagenomic DNA can also be screened for expression activities by functional analysis. Although it holds great potential in terms of shaping ecological theory; however, due to the slow screening technology it is subsequently lagging behind shotgun sequencing (Zhou et al. 2015).

3.3 Metagenomics of Plant Rhizosphere

The rhizosphere, a narrow zone of soil, is generally altered by factors like plant root secretions. It is rich in the microbiome population and may carry up to 10⁸–10¹² bacterial cells per gram of root or rhizosphere soil (Kennedy and de Luna 2005; Egamberdieva et al. 2008) that comprises more than 30 000 prokaryotic species (Suyal et al. 2016). These rhizospheric microbes have tremendous diversity in terms of their metabolic capabilities, thus playing a vital role in plant health. Therefore, to unveil their roles in the plant system, a proper understanding of their community structure is the need of the hour. Traditionally, genomics has focused on the small proportion, i.e. 1–3% of cultivable microbes; however, due to the advancement in culture‐independent molecular tools like metagenomics, high‐throughput DNA sequencing, and bioinformatics, our understanding of microbial activities in the rhizosphere has been revolutionized. With the help of advanced DNA—sequencing technologies, the microbial community structures in the rhizosphere can be characterized and compared with the microbial structures in distant soil, a part of the soil that does not come under the direct influence of the root (Turner et al. 2013; Bouffaud et al. 2014; Ofek‐Lalzar et al. 2014; Roume et al. 2015). Using a high‐throughput sequencing‐based metagenomic approach, the composition and function of the microbial community in influent water (as a reference matrix) and reed rhizosphere soil of a constructed