Point-of-Care Ultrasound Techniques for the Small Animal Practitioner. Группа авторов

Canine anaphylaxis^a Flat, hypovolemic CVC, (see Table 7.6) Massive histamine release resulting in acute marked hepatic venous congestion Pericardial effusion^q FAT, distended, hypervolemic CVC, referred to as vena cava plethora in people (see Table 7.6) (Himelman et al. 1988) Marked hepatic venous congestion from obstruction of blood flow to the right atrium Right‐sided congestive heart failure (dilated cardiomyopathy, pulmonary hypertension, tricuspid disease)^a FAT, distended, hypervolemic CVC, referred to as vena cava plethora in people (see Table 7.6) (Himelman et al. 1988) Marked hepatic venous congestion from backflow of blood from the right atrium Cholecystitis Variable Direct inflammation Pancreatitis Variable Direct inflammation Hypoproteinemia (third spacing) Variable Vascular leak Immune‐mediated hemolytic anemia Variable (author experience, unpublished) Likely immune‐mediated and volume overload, does not indicate anaphylaxis in many patients Post transfusion^b Variable to FAT, hypervolemia (author experience, unpublished) Likely immune‐mediated and volume overload, does not indicate anaphylaxis in many patients

      ^a Conditions that are most important to consider in the acute triage setting of acute collapse and weakness in a previously healthy patient (dog). FAT, flat, and bounce are defined in the text.

      ^b Many posttransfusion cases develop gallbladder wall edema that is not anaphylaxis. Look at your patient and correlate its clinical profile with the finding of gallbladder wall edema.

       Characterizing the Caudal Vena Cava

      Measurements

      Guidelines for caudal vena caval (CVC) absolute size in dogs of various weight classes have been created by the author from the data generously provided by Dr Elodie Darnis and colleagues (Darnis et al. 2018). More indepth CVC detail regarding measurements and formulas may be found in her co‐authored Chapter 26.

      The expected CVC maximum heights for three weight classes of dogs taken in the longitudinal plane at the FAST DH view (subxiphoid) are shown in Table 7.6. The absolute height measurements should be combined with the “eyeball method” of evaluating respirophasic dynamic changes in the CVC. This gestalt “eyeball method” essentially assesses the CVC Collapsibility Index, which is the difference between maximum and minimum diameter divided by the maximum diameter multiplied by 100%.

The author has characterized the CVC as having a “bounce,” being “FAT” or “flat” for categorizing its clinical relevance to volume status. A “bounce” is a “fluid‐responsive” CVC; a “FAT” CVC is a distended CVC suggesting a “fluid‐intolerant” CVC reflective of an abnormally high central venous pressure (hypervolemia); and a “flat” CVC is a “fluid‐starved” CVC reflective of a “hypovolemic CVC.” The terms “FAT” and “flat” have been descriptively used in the human literature (Ferrada et al. 2012a,b) and many clinicians combine absolute maximum inferior vena cava height measurements with the “eyeball method” (FAT or flat). More and more, these same clinicians are incorporating basic echo views and lung ultrasound findings for more clinical integration to accurately assess volume status and thus guide fluid resuscitation in people (Ferrada et al. 2012a,b). Similar approaches are being investigated in veterinary medicine (Nelson et al. 2010; Lisciandro 2014a, 2016a, Lisciandro and Fosgate 2017; Bucci et al. 2017; Kwak et al. 2017; Tuplin et al. 2017; Darnis et al. 2018; Marshall et al. 2018; Cambournac et al. 2018) (see Chapters 26, 36, and 37 and also Figures 36.8–36.12). The terms “FAT” (fluid intolerant, high central venous pressure, inferior vena cava >2 cm) and “flat” (fluid starved, low central venous pressure, hypovolemia) are routinely used in human medicine in the San Antonio area (Ferrada et al. 2012a,b). The author has added the term “bounce” for a fluid‐responsive CVC. The suggested CVC measurements shown in Table 7.6 are at least a start and are easy to remember over formulas.

Table 7.6. Reference values for the caudal vena cava (CVC) measured in longitudinal at the subxiphoid^a view in 126 healthy dogs, grouped into three body weight classes.

Size	Body weight (kg)	Expected CVC height measurement (cm)	CVC +/‐2 standard deviations (cm)	Suggested CVC maximum height (cm) for a “flat” or hypovolemic, fluid‐starved CVC	Suggested CVC maximum height (cm) for a “FAT” or fluid‐intolerant CVC (high central venous pressure)
Small/Toyb	<9 kg	0.55	(0.23–0.86)	<0.25	>1.0
Medium	>9–15 kg	0.85	(0.32–1.38)	<0.35	>1.5
Large/Giant	>15 kg	0.96	(0.51–1.4)	<0.50	>1.5

      Data from the study by Darnis et al. (2018) and measurements created with permission by Lisciandro GR and Vientós‐Plotts AI. These values are unproven but give some guidelines for veterinary clinicians to combine with the eyeball method – “bounce”, “FAT,” and “flat.”

      ^a The subxiphoid view is analogous to the FAST DH view and the CVC imaged in its longitudinal plane.

      ^b Suggested starting point for felines while awaiting current research findings.

      Integrating Global FAST Information

The characterization of the CVC is key because it helps with clinical integration of information when sonographic striation of the gallbladder is found in acute collapse or weakness in a dog with a previous healthy history (Figure 7.12) (Lisciandro 2014a). In canine