Nanobiotechnology in Diagnosis, Drug Delivery and Treatment. Группа авторов

Читать онлайн.
Название Nanobiotechnology in Diagnosis, Drug Delivery and Treatment
Автор произведения Группа авторов
Жанр Химия
Серия
Издательство Химия
Год выпуска 0
isbn 9781119671862



Скачать книгу

of Microbiology, Nicolaus Copernicus University, Torun, Poland

      Nanotechnology provides different types of nanomaterials (NMs) which are built from various materials and show varied shapes, sizes, and chemical and surface properties (Laroui et al. 2013). Moreover, all such nanomaterials have been reported to have a broad spectrum of applications in industry, environmental protection and medicine. Several kinds of nanomaterials, namely metallic nanoparticles, quantum dots (QDs), silica nanospheres, magnetic nanoparticles, carbon nanotubes, graphene nanostructured surfaces, etc., were found to have attractive applications in diagnostic tests such as genotyping techniques, immunohistochemistry assays, detection of biomarkers, early cancer detection, and many others (Lyberopoulou et al. 2016). Nanomaterials have been also used as drug carriers in bioimaging and cancer treatment (Zottel et al. 2019). However, the balance between physical properties of nanomaterials, their biocompatibility, and the evidence of no cytotoxic effects is the key to their successful use in clinical applications. Nanomaterials can offer interesting interactions with biomolecules present on cell surfaces or inside the cell (Laroui et al. 2013). A particularly important feature is the configuration of the ligands and their interaction with the atoms present on the particle surface which play a significant role in determining the physiochemical properties of the nanomaterials and thus nanoparticle interaction with the human body and biological material (Bayford et al. 2017).

      The application of nanotechnology in cancer research has provided hope within the scientific community for the development of novel cancer therapeutic strategies. Therefore, nanomaterials are being advanced as novel and more targeted treatments for diseases such as cancers which are difficult to manage (Zottel et al. 2019). Gastrointestinal (GI) diseases affect the GI tract, from the esophagus to the rectum, and the accessory digestive organs. These diseases include acute, chronic, recurrent, or functional disorders while covering a broad range of diseases, including the most common ones, namely acute and chronic inflammatory bowel diseases (IBDs) (Riasat et al. 2016). The GI cancers are especially dangerous as they contribute to more than 55% of deaths associated with cancer. Therefore, tremendous efforts have been made to develop the novel diagnostic and therapeutic methods for improving quality and life span of patient's (Laroui et al. 2013).

      In this chapter we present applications of nanomaterials in the diagnosis and treatment of GI disorders. The major types of nanoparticles that have potential use both in gastroenterology and general medicine are discussed; moreover, nanoparticle behavior in the GI tract is also discussed. The application of nanotechnology in medicine is a rapidly developing area of investigation. It is believed that nanotechnology will play an important role in the assessment and treatment of gastroenterological diseases. Some of the nanomaterial‐based therapies and diagnostics presented here outperform conventional materials in terms of efficacy, reliability, and practicality.

      Nanomaterials are characterized by their small size, commonly defined to be of diameter in the range of 1–100 nm and large surface area to volume ratio. However, in principle, NMs are described as materials with a length of 1–1000 nm in at least one dimension. Size is an important feature of nanomaterials as it affects their cellular uptake, physical properties, and interactions with biomolecules. It is observed that the smaller the size the easier the penetration of nanoparticles through the cell envelope (Jeevanandam et al. 2018). Kumar et al. (2016) reported that nanoparticles in the range of 1–10 nm have the capacity to diffuse into tumor cells. This helps to overcome limitations related to chemotherapy using free drugs such as poor in vivo/in vitro correlation and other possible resistances exhibited by tumors.

      Powers et al. (2007) demonstrated that decrease in the size of any materials leads to an exponential increase in surface area to volume ratio, thereby making the nanomaterial surface more reactive to itself and to its contiguous environments. Moreover, it is suggested that size‐dependent toxicity of nanoparticles can be attributed to its ability to enter into the biological systems and then modify the structure of various macromolecules, thereby interfering with critical biological functions (Lovrić et al. 2005; Aggarwal et al. 2009). Small particles in the size range of 5–110 nm can be used as potential carriers of anticancer drugs via intracellular drug delivery (Laroui et al. 2011). However, evaluation of other physicochemical properties of nanomaterials including surface area, solubility, chemical composition, shape, agglomeration state, crystal structure, surface energy, surface charge, surface morphology, and surface coating are essential for their safe use in clinical applications. Therefore, the role of individual, characteristic properties of nanomaterials in imparting toxic manifestations is so important (Gatoo et al. 2014).

      Nanomaterials possess good stability and much longer shelf life compared with molecular carriers (Laroui et al. 2011). The drugs can be loaded into nanoparticles at a specific concentration, and such nanoconjugates may avoid digestive processes in the GI tract, which ultimately helps in efficient drug delivery at targeted sites. Moreover, the kinetics of drug release can be modulated, and nanomaterial surfaces may be modified with ligands to affect site‐specific drug delivery (Laroui et al. 2011). Similarly, nanostructures can be conjugated to biological molecules, including hormones and antibodies, which enable their targeting to tissues expressing their cognate receptors (Fortina et al. 2007).

      3.3.1 Liposomes

      3.3.2 Polymers