Principles of Plant Genetics and Breeding. George Acquaah

Peanut Arachis hypogaea Rice Oryza sativa Sorghum Sorghum bicolor Soybean Glycine max Tobacco Nicotiana tabacum Tomato Solanum lycopersicum Wheat Triticum aestivum

      5.5.2 Mechanisms that prevent autogamy

      There are several mechanisms in nature that work to prevent self‐pollination in species that otherwise would be self‐pollinated. These include self‐incompatibility, male sterility, and dichogamy.

       Self‐incompatibility

Self‐incompatibility (or lack of self‐fruitfulness) is a condition in which the pollen from a flower is not receptive on the stigma of the same flower and hence incapable of setting seed. This happens in spite of the fact that both pollen and ovule development are normal and viable. It is caused by a genetically controlled physiological hindrance to self‐fertilization. Self‐incompatibility is widespread in nature, occurring in families such as Poaceae, Cruciferae, Compositae, and Rosaceae. The incompatibility reaction is genetically conditioned by a locus designated S, with multiple alleles that can number over 100 in some species such as Trifolium pretense. However, unlike monoecy and dioecy, all plants produce seed in self‐incompatible species.

       Self‐incompatibility systems

      Self‐incompatibility systems may be classified into two basic types: heteromorphic and homomorphic.

       Heteromorphic incompatibilityThis is caused by differences in the lengths of stamens and style (called heterostyly) (Figure 5.5). In one flower type called the pin, the styles are long while the anthers are short. In the other flower type, thrum, the reverse is true (e.g. in Primula). The pin trait is conditioned by the genotype ss while thrum is conditioned by the genotype Ss. A cross of pin (ss) × pin (ss) as well as thrum (Ss) × thrum (Ss) are incompatible. However, pin (ss) × thrum (Ss), or vice versa, is compatible. The condition described is distyly because of the two different types of style lengths of the flowers. In Lythrum three different relative positions occur (called tristyly).

       Homomorphic incompatibilityThere are two kinds of homomorphic incompatibility: gametophytic and sporophytic (Figure 5.6).Gametophytic incompatibilityIn gametophytic incompatibility (originally called the oppositional factor system), the ability of the pollen to function is determined by its own genotype and not the plant that produces it. Gametophytic incompatibility is more widespread than sporophytic incompatibility. Gametophytic incompatibility occurs in species such as red clover, white clover, and yellow sweet clover. Homomorphic incompatibility is controlled by a series of alleles at a single locus (S1, S2, …, Sn) or alleles at two loci in some species. The system is called homomorphic because the flowering structures in both the seed‐bearing (female) and pollen‐bearing (male) plants are similar. The alleles of the incompatibility gene(s) act individually in the style. They exhibit no dominance. The incompatible pollen is inhibited in the style. The pistil is diploid and hence contains two incompatibility alleles (e.g. S1S3, S3, S4). Reactions occur if identical alleles in both pollen and style are encountered. Only heterozygotes for S alleles are produced in this system.Sporophytic incompatibilityIn sporophytic incompatibility, the incompatibility characteristics of the pollen are determined by the plant (sporophyte) that produces it. It occurs in species such as broccoli, radish, and kale. The sporophytic system differs from the gametophytic system in that the S allele exhibits dominance. Also, it may have individual action in both pollen and style, making this incompatibility system complex. The dominance is determined by the pollen parent. Incompatible pollen may be inhibited on the stigma surface. For example, a plant with genotype S1S2 where S1 is dominant to S2, will produce pollen that will function like S1. Furthermore, S1 pollen will be rejected by an S1 style but received by an S2 style. Hence, homozygotes of S alleles are possible.Incompatibility is expressed in one of three general ways, depending on the species. The germination of the pollen may be decreased (e.g. in broccoli). Sometimes, removing the stigma allows normal pollen germination. In the second way, pollen germination is normal, but pollen tube growth is inhibited in the style (e.g. tobacco). In the third scenario, the incompatibility reaction occurs after fertilization (e.g. in Gesteria). This third mechanism is rare.

Figure 5.5 Heteromorphic incompatibility showing floral modifications in which anthers and pistils are of different lengths in different plants (heterostyly). This type of incompatibility is believed to be always of the sporophytic type. Pin and thrum flowers occur in flowers such as Primula, Forsythia, Oxalis, and Silia.

Figure 5.6 Types of self‐incompatibility: (a) sporophytic, and (b) gametophytic. Sporophytic incompatibility occurs in families such as Compositae and Cruciferae. It is associated with pollen grains with two generative nuclei, whereas gametophytic incompatibility is associated with pollen with one generative nucleus in the pollen tube as occurs in various kinds of clover.

       Changing the incompatibility reaction

      Mutagens (agents of mutation) such as X‐rays, radioactive sources such as P³², and certain chemicals have been used to make a self‐infertile genotype self‐fertile. Such a change is easier to achieve in gametophytic systems than sporophytic systems. Furthermore, doubling the chromosome number of species with the sporophytic system of incompatibility does not significantly alter the incompatibility reaction. This is because two different alleles already exist in a diploid that may interact to produce the incompatibility effect. Polyploidy only makes more of such alleles available. On the other hand, doubling the chromosome in a gametophytic system would allow the pollen grain to carry two different alleles (instead of one). The allelic interaction could cancel any incompatibility effect to allow selfing to be possible. For example, diploid pear is self‐incompatible whereas autotetraploid pear is self‐fruitful.

       Plant breeding implications of self‐incompatibility

Infertility of any kind hinders plant breeding. However, this handicap may be used