Agape and Personhood. David L. Goicoechea

Affliction and Holy Communion Code

      I.5.3 Loss of Father Heeren and Holy Communion Cult

      I.5.4 The Mary-Like Crusading and Holy Communion Canon

      I.5.5 Dear Husband’s Addictions and Holy Communion Creed

      I.5.6 Cultivating Petrine Authority with Matthew’s Jesus

      I.5.7 Obedience: Sacred Vertical and Holy Horizontal

      I.5.8 Chastity: Sacred Vertical and Holy Horizontal

      I.5.9 Poverty: Sacred Vertical and Holy Horizontal

      I.6 With Her Son, Bobby Brian, and Father O’Connor

      I.6.1 How Sacred Communion Graced Her with Holy Love

      I.6.2 How Sacred Confession Graced Her with Holy Peace

      I.6.3 How Sacred Matrimony Graced Her with Holy Joy

      I.6.4 How Sacred Baptism Graced Her with Holy Hope

      I.6.5 How Sacred Extreme Unction Graced Her with Holy Promise

      I.6.6 Cultivating Freedom with the Jesus of Luke’s Gospel

      I.6.7 How Sacred Confirmation Graced Their Physical Exercises

      I.6.8 How Sacred Holy Orders Graced Their Intellectual Exercises

      I.6.9 How Sacred Sacraments Graced Their Spiritual Exercises

      II. Søren Kierkegaard

      II.4 Reconciling the God-Man and Plato

      II.4.1 By Preserving Plato’s Paradoxes in the Incarnational Leap

      II.4.2 By Preserving the Learning Paradox in the Incarnation

      II.4.3 By Preserving the Love Paradox in the Incarnation

      II.4.4 By Preserving the Typhonic Paradox in the Incarnation

      II.4.5 Preserving the Absolute Paradox in the Incarnation

      II.4.6 By Not Taking Offense at the Paradox in the Incarnation

      II.4.7 By Loving His Platonic Readers as More Important

      II.4.8 Plato’s Transition from The Symposium to The Phaedrus

      II.4.9 That They Might Love the God-Man as More Important

      II.5 Reconciling the God-Man and Hegel

      II.5.1 In the Truth of the Existential Dialectic

      II.5.2 In the Objective Uncertainty of the Historical Process

      II.5.3 In Holding Fast to the Uncertainty of the Single Individual

      II.5.4 By Living in Fragments instead of the System

      II.5.5 In the Appropriation Process of a Postscript

      II.5.6 In the Inwardness of a Double Movement Leap

      II.5.7 Loving Hegel as More Important with Climacus

      II.5.8 Hegel’s History of Love and Personhood

      II.5.9 Loving the God-Man in the Most Passionate Inwardness

      II.6 Reconciling the God-Man and Adam and Eve

      II.6.1 Adam and Eve’s Leap out of Anxiety into Original Sin

      II.6.2 Hereditary Sin’s Quantitative Build-up of Anxiety

      II.6.3 Anxiety and the Leap of Faith into Actual Sins

      II.6.4 Anxious Leaping into the Inclosing Reserve or Repose

      II.6.5 That Discloses Itself All of a Sudden or is Open to Disclosure

      II.6.6 Out of Boredom or in Faith’s Most Passionate Inwardness

      II.6.7 Loving Adam and Eve as More Important in Atonement

      II.6.8 Anxiety through Faith is Absolutely Educative

      II.6.9 Loving the God-Man in Body, Soul, and Spirit

      III. St. Paul

      III.4 Paul’s Second Love Letter to the Corinthians

      III.4.1 It Was God Who Reconciled Us

      III.4.2 To Himself through Christ

      III.4.3 And Gives Us the Work

      III.4.4 Of Handing on This Reconciliation

      III.4.5 Not According to Standards of the Flesh

      III.4.6 And Not in Accord with Christ in the Flesh

      III.4.7(a) But We Have Been Reconciled (Part One)

      III.4.7(b) But We Have Been Reconciled (Part Two)

      III.4.8 As Different Members of Christ’s Body

      III.4.9 That We Should Love Our Enemies

      III.5 Paul’s Love Letter to the Galatians

      III.5.1 Paul’s Ethics of Reconciliation

      III.5.2 Is Based on the Standards of Love

      III.5.3 Which Believes That We Have Been Freed

      III.5.4 From the Law and Self Indulgence

      III.5.5 In Order to Serve All Others

      III.5.6 Greeks as Well as Jews

      III.5.7 Women as Well as Men

      III.5.8 Slaves as Well as Masters

      III.5.9 While We Prepare for the Lord’s Coming

      III.6 Paul’s Love Letter to the Romans

      III.6.1 Paul’s Anthropology of Reconciliation

      III.6.2 Bridges the Gap between God and Humans

      III.6.3 Through a Gift of Faith Like Abraham’s

      III.6.4 Which Believes That Christ Died for Us Sinners

      III.6.5 Which Proves That God Loves Us

      III.6.6 Since before We Were Reconciled to God

      III.6.7 By the Death of the Son

      III.6.8 We Were Still Enemies

      III.6.9 And Our Joyful Trust Is Proof of Our Salvation

      IV. Personhood

      IV.4 To Defining Personhood as Three Persons in One God

      IV.4.1 The Person of the Father beyond Judaism and Neo-Gnosticism

      IV.4.2 The Work of the Father beyond Judaism and Neo-Gnosticism

      IV.4.3 The Person of the Son beyond Judaism and Neo-Gnosticism

      IV.4.4 The Work of the Son beyond Judaism and Neo-Gnosticism

      IV.4.5 The Person of the Spirit beyond Judaism and Neo-Gnosticism

      IV.4.6 The Work of the Spirit beyond Judaism and Neo-Gnosticism

      IV.4.7 Incarnational Origins beyond Judaism and Neo-Gnosticism

      IV.4.8 Incarnational Religion beyond Judaism and Neo-Gnosticism

      IV.4.9 Incarnational Eschatology beyond Judaism and Neo-Gnosticism

      IV.5 To Defining Personhood as Two Natures in One Person

      IV.5.1 The Son is Fully Divine against Arian Subordination

      IV.5.2 For the Three Persons Share One Nature (Homoousios)

      IV.5.3 And the Son has Two Natures (Hypostatic Union)

      IV.5.4 His Divine Nature is Absolutely Perfect

      IV.5.5 His Human Nature Suffers, Dies, and Rises

      IV.5.6 Same Person before and after Incarnation

      IV.5.7 The Western Contribution from Tertullian to Leo

      IV.5.8 From Leo’s Summary of the West to Chalcedon

      IV.5.9