The Vice of Kings. Jasun Horsley

Читать онлайн.
Название The Vice of Kings
Автор произведения Jasun Horsley
Жанр Общая психология
Серия
Издательство Общая психология
Год выпуска 0
isbn 9781911597148



Скачать книгу

CHAPTER XVII

       A master key: Northern Foods, MI5, Groucho Club, Lord Haskins

       CHAPTER XVIII

       A Lamb among Wolves: Richard Dawkins, Gore Vidal, the Secret of Secrets

       PART II: THE CROWLEY JOKE

       CHAPTER XIX

       Pedophilia and organized ritual abuse

       CHAPTER XX

       None dare call it insanity: Crowley, occultism, and child sacrifice

       CHAPTER XXI

       Island of the Ipsissimus: the Abbey of Thelema

       CHAPTER XXII

       To the assault! or: why should we take Crowley seriously?

       CHAPTER XXIII

       Hangdog with a Hard-On

       CHAPTER XXIV

       A sodomitic will: from the Crow's mouth

       CHAPTER XXV

       Necessary offense: the left-hand path and sexual liberation as social engineering

       CHAPTER XXVI

       A Luciferian Lighthouse: an act of unconscious animal sacrifice

       CHAPTER XXVII

       Circles of denial: checking in with the experts

       CHAPTER XXVIII

       Over to Satan's Side: Espionage, Black Mass, and Blackmail

       CHAPTER XXIX

       A worn-out toy: Poupée's death, God-identification, Garbanzo's passing

       CHAPTER XXX

       Spectral justice: the unconscious confession of the taboo-breaker

       CHAPTER XXXI

       Abuse culture and the law of the strong

       CHAPTER XXXII

       Blood Treason

       AFTERWORD

       The truth of affect

       NOTES

       REFERENCES

       INDEX

       ABOUT THE AUTHOR

      A word of caution: The book you are about to read is an exploration into (among others things) systematized child sexual abuse, in some cases of the most extreme kind, as well as the philosophies and rationales behind it. It includes some of the author's own possible experiences of the same. As such, it may be disturbing—and even potentially destabilizing—to readers with experiences of sexual abuse in their own past.

       COCK-UP OR CONSPIRACY? (AUTHOR'S NOTE)

      Theodore Dalrymple once said that we are more attached to our worldviews than we are to the world. The book you are about to read presents a challenge to my worldview, and I wrote it, so I fully anticipate that some readers will have objections to what I have written. The Vice of Kings is the third in a loose-knit trilogy, with Seen and Not Seen: Confessions of a Movie Autist and Prisoner of Infinity: UFOs, Social Engineering, and the Psychology of Fragmentation as the first installments. Familiarity with these other works is helpful but not essential. While these books’ thesis—that of cultural engineering—may appear to have much in common with the (increasingly mainstream) conspiratorial view of history, I have made every effort throughout to keep my own interpretations, speculations, and theories to the minimum, and let the facts speak for themselves. As independent researcher Ty Brown once put it, “Observe more, interpret less.” Of course, what constitutes a fact is itself open to interpretation, especially when it comes to the kind of controversial subject matter that this book covers. For this reason, I have done my best with this present work to only cite books from reputable publishers and authors, articles from mainstream papers, magazines, and websites (mostly British), and, whenever straying of necessity into the murky waters of independent online research, to stick to responsible and fully cited articles (such as appear at The Needle or Ian Pace's site).

      It may be argued that mainstream media itself is hardly a trustworthy source when it comes to reporting high-level crimes and institutional corruption (and I admit to resorting to The Daily Mail whenever more respected papers have stayed away from a given subject). But even the British popular press is at least subject to reprisals for irresponsible journalism, so I have trusted that, as long as information printed has not been contested, it now belongs in the category of “official” history.

      Regarding