The Diary of Samuel Pepys — Complete. Samuel Pepys

Читать онлайн.
Название The Diary of Samuel Pepys — Complete
Автор произведения Samuel Pepys
Жанр Документальная литература
Серия
Издательство Документальная литература
Год выпуска 0
isbn 4057664171177



Скачать книгу

original marriage certificate, which is as follows: “Samuell Peps

       of this parish Gent. & Elizabeth De Snt. Michell of Martins in the

       fields, Spinster. Published October 19tn, 22nd, 29th 1655, and

       were married by Richard Sherwin Esqr one of the justices of the

       Peace of the Cittie and Lyberties of Westm. December 1st. (Signed)

       Ri. Sherwin.”]

      but strangely enough Pepys himself supposed his wedding day to have been October 10th. Lord Braybrooke remarks on this,

      “It is notorious that the registers in those times were very ill

       kept, of which we have here a striking instance. … Surely a

       man who kept a diary could not have made such a blunder.”

      What is even more strange than Pepys’s conviction that he was married on October 10th is Mrs. Pepys’s agreement with him: On October 10th, 1666, we read,

      “So home to supper, and to bed, it being my wedding night, but how

       many years I cannot tell; but my wife says ten.”

      Here Mrs. Pepys was wrong, as it was eleven years; so she may have been wrong in the day also. In spite of the high authority of Mr. and Mrs. Pepys on a question so interesting to them both, we must accept the register as conclusive on this point until further evidence of its incorrectness is forthcoming.

      Sir Edward Montage (afterwards Earl of Sandwich), who was Pepys’s first cousin one remove (Pepys’s grandfather and Montage’s mother being brother and sister), was a true friend to his poor kinsman, and he at once held out a helping hand to the imprudent couple, allowing them to live in his house. John Pepys does not appear to have been in sufficiently good circumstances to pay for the education of his son, and it seems probable that Samuel went to the university under his influential cousin’s patronage. At all events he owed his success in life primarily to Montage, to whom he appears to have acted as a sort of agent.

      On March 26th, 1658, he underwent a successful operation for the stone, and we find him celebrating each anniversary of this important event of his life with thanksgiving. He went through life with little trouble on this score, but when he died at the age of seventy a nest of seven stones was found in his left kidney.

      [“June 10th, 1669. I went this evening to London, to carry Mr.

       Pepys to my brother Richard, now exceedingly afflicted with the

       stone, who had been successfully cut, and carried the stone, as big

       as a tennis ball, to show him and encourage his resolution to go

       thro’ the operation.”—Evelyn’s Diary.]

      In June, 1659, Pepys accompanied Sir Edward Montage in the “Naseby,” when the Admiral of the Baltic Fleet and Algernon Sidney went to the Sound as joint commissioners. It was then that Montage corresponded with Charles II., but he had to be very secret in his movements on account of the suspicions of Sidney. Pepys knew nothing of what was going on, as he confesses in the Diary:

      “I do from this raise an opinion of him, to be one of the most

       secret men in the world, which I was not so convinced of before.”

      On Pepys’s return to England he obtained an appointment in the office of Mr., afterwards Sir George Downing, who was one of the Four Tellers of the Receipt of the Exchequer. He was clerk to Downing when he commenced his diary on January 1st, 1660, and then lived in Axe Yard, close by King Street, Westminster, a place on the site of which was built Fludyer Street. This, too, was swept away for the Government offices in 1864–65. His salary was £50 a year. Downing invited Pepys to accompany him to Holland, but he does not appear to have been very pressing, and a few days later in this same January he got him appointed one of the Clerks of the Council, but the recipient of the favour does not appear to have been very grateful. A great change was now about to take place in Pepys’s fortunes, for in the following March he was made secretary to Sir Edward Montage in his expedition to bring about the Restoration of Charles II., and on the 23rd he went on board the “Swiftsure” with Montage. On the 30th they transferred themselves to the “Naseby.” Owing to this appointment of Pepys we have in the Diary a very full account of the daily movements of the fleet until, events having followed their natural course, Montage had the honour of bringing Charles II. to Dover, where the King was received with great rejoicing. Several of the ships in the fleet had names which were obnoxious to Royalists, and on the 23rd May the King came on board the “Naseby” and altered there—the “Naseby” to the “Charles,” the “Richard” to the “Royal James,” the “Speaker” to the “Mary,” the “Winsby” to the “Happy Return,” the “Wakefield” to the “Richmond,” the “Lambert” to the “Henrietta,” the “Cheriton” to the “Speedwell,” and the “Bradford” to the “Success.” This portion of the Diary is of particular interest, and the various excursions in Holland which the Diarist made are described in a very amusing manner.

      When Montagu and Pepys had both returned to London, the former told the latter that he had obtained the promise of the office of Clerk of the Acts for him. Many difficulties occurred before Pepys actually secured the place, so that at times he was inclined to accept the offers which were made to him to give it up. General Monk was anxious to get the office for Mr. Turner, who was Chief Clerk in the Navy Office, but in the end Montagu’s influence secured it for Pepys. Then Thomas Barlow, who had been appointed Clerk of the Acts in 1638, turned up, and appeared likely to become disagreeable. Pepys bought him off with an annuity of too, which he did not have to pay for any length of time, as Barlow died in February, 1664–65. It is not in human nature to be greatly grieved at the death of one to whom you have to pay an annuity, and Pepys expresses his feelings in a very naive manner:—

      “For which God knows my heart I could be as sorry as is possible for

       one to be for a stranger by whose death he gets £100 per annum, he

       being a worthy honest man; but when I come to consider the

       providence of God by this means unexpectedly to give me £100 a year

       more in my estate, I have cause to bless God, and do it from the

       bottom of my heart.”

      This office was one of considerable importance, for not only was the holder the secretary or registrar of the Navy Board, but he was also one of the principal officers of the navy, and, as member of the board, of equal rank with the other commissioners. This office Pepys held during the whole period of the Diary, and we find him constantly fighting for his position, as some of the other members wished to reduce his rank merely to that of secretary. In his contention Pepys appears to have been in the right, and a valuable MS. volume in the Pepysian library contains an extract from the Old Instructions of about 1649, in which this very point is argued out. The volume appears to have been made up by William Penn the Quaker, from a collection of manuscripts on the affairs of the navy found in his father’s, “Sir William Penn’s closet.” It was presented to Charles II., with a dedication ending thus:—

      “I hope enough to justifie soe much freedome with a Prince that is

       so easie to excuse things well intended as this is

       “BY

       “Great Prince,

       “Thy faithfull subject,

       “WM. PENN”

       “London, the 22 of the Mo. called June, 1680.”

      It does not appear how the volume came into Pepys’s possession. It may have been given him by the king, or he may have taken it as a perquisite of his office. The book has an index, which was evidently added by Pepys; in this are these entries, which show his appreciation of the contents of the MS.:—

      “Clerk of the Acts,

       his duty,

       his necessity and usefulness.”

      The