Velvet Elvis: Repainting the Christian Faith. Rob Bell

a gathering of the leaders of a massive Christian denomination (literally millions of members worldwide). The reason their annual gathering was in the news was that they had voted to reaffirm their view of the importance of the verse that says a wife’s role is to submit to her husband.

      This is a big deal to them.

      This is what made news.

      This is what they are known for.

      What about the verse before that verse?

      What about the verse after it?

      What about the verse that talks about women having authority over their husbands?4

      What about all of the marriages in which this verse has been used to oppress and mistreat women?

      It is possible to make the Bible say whatever we want it to, isn’t it?

      How is it that the Bible can be so many different things to so many different people?

      Nazis, cult leaders, televangelists who promise that God will bless you if you just get out your checkbook, racists, people who oppress minorities and the poor and anyone not like them—they all can find verses in the Bible to back up their agendas.

      We have all heard the Bible used in certain ways and found ourselves asking, “Oh God, you couldn’t have meant that, could you?”

      Somebody recently told me, “As long as you teach the Bible, I have no problem with you.”

      Think about that for a moment.

      What that person was really saying is, “As long as you teach my version of the Bible, I’ll have no problem with you.” And the more people insist that they are just taking the Bible for what it says, the more skeptical I get.

      Which for me raises one huge question: Is the Bible the best God can do?

      With God being so massive and awe-inspiring and full of truth, why is his book capable of so much confusion?

      Why did God do it this way?

      Where does one go in trying to make sense of what the Bible even is, let alone what it says?

      For me, clarity has begun to emerge when I’ve begun to understand what Jesus believed about the scriptures.

      Let’s start with a straightforward verse from the book of Leviticus: “Do not seek revenge or bear a grudge against anyone among your people, but love your neighbor as yourself. I am the Lord.”5

      Could there be a more basic verse? “Love your neighbor as yourself.”

      Who could possibly have any sort of problem with this verse?

      And how could someone mess this up?

      What could be complicated about loving your neighbor?

      Even people who don’t believe in God and don’t read the Bible would say that loving your neighbor is a good thing to do.

      A couple of questions this verse raises: How do we live this verse out? What does it mean to love? What isn’t love? Who decides what is love and what isn’t love?

      And what about your neighbor? Who is your neighbor? Is your neighbor only the person next door, or is it anyone you have contact with? Or is it every single human being on the face of the planet?

      And what happens if one person’s definition of love and another person’s definition differ? Who is right? Who is wrong? Who decides who is right and who is wrong? Who decides if whoever decided made the right decision?

      So even a verse as basic as this raises more questions than it answers.

      In order to live it out and not just talk about it, someone somewhere has to make decisions about this verse. Someone has to decide what it actually looks like to put flesh and blood on this command.

      And that’s because the Bible is open-ended.

      It has to be interpreted. And if it isn’t interpreted, then it can’t be put into action. So if we are serious about following God, then we have to interpret the Bible. It is not possible to simply do what the Bible says. We must first make decisions about what it means at this time, in this place, for these people.

      Here’s another example from the Torah (the Jewish name for the first five books of the Bible): “Remember the Sabbath day by keeping it holy.”6 The next verses command the people to do no work on this Sabbath day; they then explain the command by saying that God rested on the seventh day after creating the world in the first six days.

      You can already see the questions this verse raises: Who defines work? Who defines rest? What if work to one person is rest to another? What if rest to one person is work to another? And what does it mean to make a day holy? How do you know if you’ve kept something holy? How would you know if you hadn’t?

      Once again, the Bible is open-ended. It has to be interpreted.

      Somebody has to decide what it means to love your neighbor, and somebody has to decide what it means to observe the Sabbath and keep it holy.

      Rabbis

      Now the ancient rabbis understood that the Bible is open-ended and has to be interpreted. And they understood that their role in the community was to study and meditate and discuss and pray and then make those decisions. Rabbis are like interpreters, helping people understand what God is saying to them through the text and what it means to live out the text.

      Take for example the Sabbath command in Exodus. A rabbi would essentially put actions in two categories: things the rabbi permitted on the Sabbath and things the rabbi forbade on the Sabbath. The rabbi was driven by a desire to get as close as possible to what God originally intended in the command at hand. One rabbi might say that you could walk so far on the Sabbath, but if you went farther, that would be work and you would be violating the Sabbath. Another might permit you to walk farther but forbid you to do certain actions another rabbi might permit.

      Different rabbis had different sets of rules, which were really different lists of what they forbade and what they permitted. A rabbi’s set of rules and lists, which was really that rabbi’s interpretation of how to live the Torah, was called that rabbi’s yoke. When you followed a certain rabbi, you were following him because you believed that rabbi’s set of interpretations were the closest to what God intended through the scriptures. And when you followed that rabbi, you were taking up that rabbi’s yoke.

      One rabbi even said his yoke was easy.7

      The intent then of a rabbi having a yoke wasn’t just to interpret the words correctly; it was to live them out. In the Jewish context, action was always the goal. It still is.

      Rabbis would spend hours discussing with their students what it meant to live out a certain text. If a student made a suggestion about what a certain text meant and the rabbi thought the student had totally missed the point, the rabbi would say, “You have abolished the Torah,” which meant that in the rabbi’s opinion, the student wasn’t anywhere near what God wanted. But if the student got it right, if the rabbi thought the student had grasped God’s intention in the text, the rabbi would say, “You have fulfilled the Torah.”

      Notice what Jesus says in one of his first messages: “I have not come to abolish [the Torah] but to fulfill [it].”8 He was essentially saying, “I didn’t come to do away with the words of God; I came to show people what it looks like when the Torah is lived out perfectly, right down to the smallest punctuation marks.”

      “I’m here to put flesh and blood on the words.”9

      Most rabbis taught the yoke of a well respected rabbi who had come before them. So if you visited a synagogue and the local rabbi (Torah teacher) was going to teach, you might hear