Nothing & Dot. Reorganization of reason. Sergey B. Konstantinov

comes to mind. A very strange “problem”. Does it even exist? Or …is it also a Myth?

      Let us digress for a moment to the “problem” of replacing all parts of a whole (either sequentially or simultaneously, which is irrelevant). This implies a certain monument, however, one can consider a similar act of replacing all parts of any “complex things’ with the question: Will the “Thing Itself” and the essence of the attitude towards it be preserved? Will not the replacement of all parts affect the attitude, due to the loss of the Status of the Original, and that true uniqueness and belonging that the “thing’ possessed in the first place?

      Any object, as we have found out, at each moment differs from its previous form, mass, and composition. This is confirmed by physics, chemistry, logic, and also metaphysics;

      Therefore, before the replacement of the parts of the “Ship of Theseus”, the parts were already different from the original. The ship can be considered original only when it belongs to Theseus, and when Theseus himself is on it. In this case, the Essence of the replacement is not important – he (Theseus) could replace any parts, and at any time, this did not violate the ship’s ownership. Theseus does not exist, as does his ship. If we only recognize the ship and honor it as a monument, then nothing can change this attitude, and nevertheless, the latter does not solve the problem, but – it is definitely solved by the fact that a “thing’ cannot be static in the conditions of reality, and the details of such, too, change at every moment. That is why the replacement of those parts that have become unusable – does not in any way violate the “essence of the Ship Itself’, as well as other “repaired things’, otherwise, we assert that – the originals actually do not exist, but our attitude is the only proof of the originality of “things’;

      * * *

      Let us once again pay attention to the realization. When the mechanism of contemplation is studied, we break it down into parts (studying step by step). In this case, we perceive and realize the processes that occur not step by step (that is, in the current mode) and the realization of reality, as a flow – dynamically, as if flooding (streaming) events [from outside -> into inside], filling the space. Here it is necessary to clarify that it is possible to assert that only the visible volume is filled, that is, that “there is something around the corner” – it is impossible to prove unless we use conditions that are still unknown to us. We have to take into account the periods (stages) that we consider in our reasoning, and their seemingly greater length in comparison with the transition of the point of attention (the point of concentration) along the wave of change of the object, or situation, “from one point to another’ – in this sense, there is no “real dynamics” at all, and the expression “real dynamics” is absurd to the point of impossibility, as are “real objects and situations”. That is, the processes being studied, “occurring in reality’, can be understood as “illusory’ and “pseudo-real’, …if try to scrupulously understand the “System Structure” – this will come in handy;

      Let’s continue the research using the separation method, as before (we have no other choice), otherwise it is impossible to understand, the final result is extremely important to us;

      It is obvious that the “current objects mass” dynamically fills the <surrounding> space – coming from the outside -> in. Considering the transition inward, when photons cross the body’s boundary (see fig. 1), and looking at the initially previous picture, we understand that we are contemplating inside ourselves, leaving the “past” outside – and falling inward, together with our body;

      Transform the step-by-step reasoning into a flow, it turns out that being in an active state, we fly to inside Ourselves, participating in events – constantly trying to gain experience and this corresponds to the phrase: “To live, you need to learn” (develop);

      Why “trying”? Because experience should be divided into passive (just empty), which could not be extracted – which was missed in the development process, and effective – i.e. completely new, extracted through existing experience, necessary for further development and useful;

      While exploring, we must constantly remember about the current flow (as a condition), more precisely: about our flight into the Self and immersion into the “I”. This is very important. There is a valuable meaning in connecting this interesting fact with the “catchphrase’ of Delphi: “know thyself”. The complex can be too simple;

      * * *

      We will also consider the current notion of reality, perceived as a simple sequence of -broad- time frames. For example, if we are talking about the past, then this category includes long-term events, or certain extended states, which we draw in the same way as we imagine a “reality frame” and then return this picture for analysis – we do this again and again. Also, people often worry about something, and project a returning frame that irritates the psyche when they “voluntarily practice experiencing.” By the way, they receive a specific experience, which is subsequently necessarily transformed into something unpleasant;

      Reality in such falsifications represents a whole “period of the necessary degree of clarity’. The clearest and most detailed “fresh past’ is available in memory for a shorter time than low-detailed events in their general presentation. Over time, the past will no longer be able to return as it was remembered at the moment of the realization of the long-past reality, since the attitude towards the events that happened will change radically. But, we are always learning the business of acquiring experience, and periodic analysis of similar <or similar> events, with special persistence, will lead to the acquisition of new experience, possibly more valuable than when analyzing the “obvious original’ – when we faced with a given situation “under real conditions”;

      fig. 4

      (wide time frames are supplemented with data from memory)

      If we assume a “time machine” :) and move to a familiar past – for the traveler everything will be different, not like before, but completely new, and he will get a new experience. Everything that we do not see constantly, or almost daily – when meeting can turn out to be an amazing surprise;

      It is appropriate to briefly talk about the future. First of all, it should be understood that the future as such does not exist, but one can fantasize in imagining it. The future, that is, “in mental space’, is realized only taking into account the existing experience, and if you suddenly move with a time machine “into the future’, five years ahead, and then return to the starting point, then when these same five years have passed, but in the usual manner, the place of visit will be realized completely differently, taking into account the experience acquired during the past five years, but in completely different conditions, including the experience gained when visiting the future using a time machine. And yet, this is nothing more than fantasy, because the future does not exist, but, from the current point of realization, as we have already established, it (the future) is formed from the existing experience, but travel to the past is most likely possible, or will become possible. But, there are also oddities;

      * * *

      If we assume that our X100-great-great-children (that’s ~5 thousand years about) did invent a time machine and traveled to our days. Theoretically, when returning back, they could take a traveler from our time with them, with the purpose of visiting (him) the future. In our 5000 years, with the complete absence of time for the Entity, and taking into account the exponential growth of the level of technology – they already have such a device, and then the UFOs flying everywhere – it is they (i.e. earthlings, people) from the future, flying and living among us, with the purpose of studying and, probably, correcting events in their time. They do not make contact because of the threat (development) of dangerous consequences due to interference. Let’s call