Essentials of Veterinary Ophthalmology. Kirk N. Gelatt

curvature; (iii) changing the distance between the cornea and retina; or (iv) having two or more separate optical pathways of different refractive powers. Accommodation is most commonly measured using IR photoretinoscopy, which uses reflection of IR light from the fundus to measure dynamic changes in the refractive error. Since mammalian accommodation is mediated by contraction of the smooth ciliary muscle, it can be stimulated by pilocarpine. Humans and other primates accommodate by changing the curvature of the lens (Figure 2.12). To view distant objects, sympathetic innervation induces relaxation of the ciliary body muscle, which in turn leads to stretching of the lens zonule. The increased tension of the zonules results in a greater pull on the lens capsule, thus causing the lens to become more discoid and decreasing its overall axial thickness and refractive power in a process of disaccommodation. To accommodate for near objects, the reverse process takes place. Parasympathetic input induces contraction of the ciliary body muscles, leading to relaxation of the zonular fibers and reduced tension on the lens capsule. In turn, this liberates the inherent elasticity of the lens, resulting in a more spherical lens possessing greater axial thickness and refractive power. Consequently, anterior chamber depth decreases and increases during accommodation and disaccommodation, respectively.

Unlike mammals, chickens (and possibly lizards) also accommodate by changing the corneal curvature. Corneal accommodation is mediated by the anterior ciliary muscle. Contraction of Crampton's muscle, which originates in the sclera and inserts in the cornea, flattens the peripheral cornea and increases the curvature of the central cornea. Corneal accommodation is reported to play an important role in chicken accommodation, contributing 8–9 D. Thus, the reported combined (corneal and lenticular) accommodative power of the eye in young chicks is 25 D, compared with a maximal power of 15 D in children.

Figure 2.11 The effect of vitreous elongation on ocular refraction. (a) A focused emmetropic eye. (b) The refractive power of the eye has not changed, and the light is focused on the same spot as in panel (a). However, due to vitreous elongation, the retina has moved posteriorly, and therefore the light is now focused in front of the retina. As a result, the eye is now nearsighted or myopic.

      Pupil

      The pupillary aperture is not considered to be a classic refractive structure as it has no refractive index, but it does make an important contribution to the resolving power of the eye. As the pupil dilates in dim light, the number of photons entering the eye increases, resulting in increased retinal illumination. However, there is “a price to be paid” for this increased illumination, as mydriasis also decreases the depth of focus of the eye. This means that as the pupil dilates, the range of distances at which objects remain in focus decreases.

      Abnormal Refractive States and Optical Errors

      Emmetropia and Ametropia

      The “purpose” of refraction and the accommodative processes described in the previous sections is to focus an image on the outer segments of the photoreceptors. An emmetropic eye is one in which parallel light rays (from a distant object) are focused on the outer segments when the eye is disaccommodated. A nonemmetropic, or ametropic, eye is one in which the focused image (from a distant object) falls anterior to the retina (i.e., nearsighted or myopic eye) or posterior to it (i.e., farsighted, hyperopic or hypermetropic eye) (see Figure 2.12).

Retinoscopy is the most commonly used clinical method to determine the refractive state of the eye in young children and animals. It is based on two assumptions: first, that light emerging from the eye (i.e., emergent rays) follows the same optical path as light entering the eye; and second, that the fundus reflex originates at the level of the outer segments. If those two assumptions hold, then emergent rays exit an emmetropic eye as parallel rays, a hypermetropic eye as diverging rays, and a myopic eye as converging rays. Therefore, the location of the focal point formed by the emergent rays can be used to determine the refractive state of the eye. Table 2.15 lists refractive errors in select species. Most of these values have been determined using streak retinoscopy, though autorefractors have also been used in veterinary medicine. A large survey found that, on average, dogs are indeed emmetropic, with a mean refractive error of −0.05 D. Nine dog breeds, including English Springer Spaniel, German Shepherd, Golden Retriever, Siberian Husky, Shetland Sheepdog, Labrador Retriever, Border Collie, Samoyed, and “other” terriers were found to be emmetropic (defined as having a mean refractive error <0.5 D in either direction). The same study also found that 8% of all dogs were hypermetropic, with a refractive error of up to +3.25 D. Three breeds (Australian Shepherd, Alaskan Malamute, and Bouvier des Flandres) were found to have a mean refractive error that was hypermetropic.

Figure 2.12 (a) In emmetropia, parallel light rays are focused on the retina. (b) In a farsighted (hypermetropic or hyperopic) eye, light rays are focused behind the retina. (c) In a nearsighted, or myopic, eye, the light is focused in front of the retina.

      A study in cats reported that kittens (≤4 months) are myopic, with a mean error of −2.45 D, while adult cats are close to emmetropia, with a mean error of −0.39 D, thus demonstrating a significant effect of age. It is interesting to note that myopia decreases with age in cats, but in horses and in some dog breeds, notably the English Springer Spaniel and Beagle, it increases with age.

      Several large studies have shown horses to be overall emmetropic. However, only 48–68% of horses are emmetropic in both eyes, with hyperopia and myopia reported in equal proportions in the ametropic horses, with errors of up to ±3 D. Age and breed may affect the refractive error in horses.

      A large range of retinoscopy values is reported in species with small eyes. For example, values range from +20 to −13 D in the rat, and from −0.7 to +13.7 D in C57BL/6J mice.

      Aphakic Eyes and Intraocular Lenses

      Because of the significant refractive role of the lens, cataract surgery (or any surgical lens extraction) resulting in aphakia leaves the eye severely hypermetropic. The aphakic eye lacks the refractive contribution of the lens; therefore, light is not sufficiently refracted, resulting in image formation “behind” the retina. Since the early 1980s, veterinary ophthalmologists have sought to alleviate this problem by implanting IOLs in dogs' eyes following cataract extraction. The purpose of these implants is to compensate for loss of refraction by the lens, thereby returning the eye to an emmetropic state. Following the results of studies involving large numbers of dogs of various breeds, it has been determined that the canine IOL should have a power of 40.0–41.5 D. The 1.5 D range of recommended values probably results from breed differences. Use of 41 D IOLs in 60 dogs resulted in an average refractive error of ≤1.2 D. However, it is important to note that though 41 D IOLs are used to bring aphakic dogs to emmetropia, this does not mean that aphakic dogs suffer from hypermetropia of 41 D.

While canine IOLs are widely used by veterinary ophthalmologists, their development and use in other species is lagging behind. A study in horses concluded that an IOL of 25–30 D overcorrects the aphakic equine eye, even though preliminary calculations showed a theoretical power of up to 30 D. Subsequent studies, supported by a calculated IOL power of 15.4 D, have shown that a 14 D IOL brought 5/6 horse eyes to within 0.4 D of emmetropia.

Table 2.15 Refractive errors in selected animal species.^a