Surgery of Exotic Animals. Группа авторов

References

      1 Andersen, E., Sondenaa, K., and Holter, J. (1989). A comparative study of polydioxanone (PDS) and polyglactin 910 (Vicryl) in colonic anastomoses in rats. International Journal of Colorectal Disease 4: 251–254.

      2 Anderson, E.T., Davis, A.S., Law, J.M. et al. (2010). Gross and histological evaluation of five suture materials in the skin and subcutaneous tissue of the California sea hare (Aplysia californica). Journal of the American Association for Laboratory Animal Science 49: 1–5.

      3 Baitchman, E.J. and Herman, T.A. (2015). Caudata (Urodela). In: Fowler’s Zoo and Wild Animal Medicine, vol. 8 (eds. R.E. Miller and M.E. Fowler), 13–20. St. Louis, MO: Elsevier Saunders.

      4 Bakkum, E.A., Dalmeijer, R.A.J., Verdel, M.J.C. et al. (1995). Quantatative analysis of the inflammatory reaction surrounding sutures commonly used in operative procedures and the realation to post surgical adhesion formation. Biomaterials 16: 1283–1289.

      5 Beauchamp, P.J., Guzick, D.S., Held, B. et al. (1988). Histologic response to microsuture materials. Journal of Reproductive Medicine 33: 615–623.

      6 Bellenger, C. (1982). Sutures Part I: The purpose of sutures and available suture materials. Compendium 4: 507–515.

      7 Bennett, R.A. (1989). Reptilian surgery part I: Basic principles. Compendium 11: 10–20.

      8 Bennett, R.A., Yaeger, M.J., Trapp, A. et al. (1997). Histologic evaluation of the tissue reaction to five suture materials in the body wall of rock doves (Columba livia). Journal of Avian Medicine and Surgery 11: 175–182.

      9 Bezwada, R.S., Jamiolkowski, D.D., Lee, I.Y. et al. (1995). Monocryl suture, a new ultra‐pliableabsorbable monofilament suture. Biomaterials 16: 1141–1148.

      10 Boone, S., Divers, S.J., and Hernandez, S.M. (2010). Evaluation of surgical techniques and internal sonic transmitter implantation in sturgeon (Acipenseridae). Proceedings American Association of Zoo Veterinarians and American Association Wildlife Veterinarians Joint Conference, pp. 199–200.

      11 Boothe, H. (1998). Selecting suture materials for small animal surgery. Compendium 20: 155–163.

      12 Cornell, K. (2012). Wound healing. In: Veterinary Surgery: Small Animal, 2e (eds. S.A. Johnston and K.M. Tobias), 125–134. St. Louis, MO: Eselvier.

      13 De La Puerta, B., Parsons, K.J., Draper, E.R.C. et al. (2011). in vitro comparison of mechanical and degradation properties of equivalent absorbable suture materials from two different manufacturers. Veterinary Surgery 40: 223–227.

      14 Deters, K., Brown, R., Carter, K. et al. (2009). Performance assessment of suture type, water temperature, and surgeon skill in juvenile chinook salmon surgically implanted with acoustic transmitters. Transactions of the American Fisheries Society 139: 888–899.

      15 Durdey, P. and Bucknall, T.E. (1984). Assessment of sutures for use in colonic surgery: an experimental study. Journal of the Royal Society of Medicine 77: 472–477.

      16 Etter, S.W., Ragetly, G.R., Bennett, R.A., and Schaeffer, D.J. (2013). Effect of using triclosan‐impregnated suture for incisional closure on surgical site infection and inflammation following tibial plateau leveling osteotomy in dogs. Journal of the American Veterinary Medical Association 242: 355–358.

      17 Fossum, T.W. (2002). Biomaterials, suturing, and hemostasis. In: Small Animal Surgery, 2e (ed. T.W. Fossum), 43–59. St. Louis, MO: Mosby.

      18 Gilliland, E. (1994). Comparison of absorbable sutures used in largemouth bass liver biopsy surgery. The Progressive Fish Culturist 56: 60–61.

      19 Gomel, V., McComb, P., and Boer‐Meisel, M. (1980). Histologic reactions to polyglactin 910, polyethylene, and nylon microsuture. Journal of Reproductive Medicine 25: 56–59.

      20 Govett, P.D., Harms, C.A., Linder, K.E. et al. (2004). Effects of four different suture materials on the surgical wound healing of loggerhead sea turtles, Caretta caretta. Journal of Herpetological Medicine and Surgery 14: 6–10.

      21 Green, S.L. (2010). The Laboratory Xenopus sp. Boca Raton, FL: CRC Press.

      22 Hanke, P.R., Timm, P., Falk, G. et al. (1994). Behavior of different suture materials in the urinary bladder of the rabbit with special reference to wound healing, epithelization and crystallization. Urologia Internationalis 52: 26–33.

      23 van Heerden, J. (2005). Comparison of inflammatory response to polyglytone 6211 and polyglecaprone 25 in a rat model. South African Medical Journal 95: 972–974.

      24 Hurty, C.A., Brazik, D.C., Law, J.M. et al. (2002). Evaluation of the tissue reactions in the skin and body wall of koi (Cyprinus carpio) to five suture materials. The Veterinary Record 151: 324–328.

      25 Jacobson, E.R., Millichamp, N.J., and Gaskin, J.M. (1985). Use of a polyvalent autogenous bacterin for treatment of mixed gram‐negative bacterial osteomyelitis in a rhinoceros viper. Journal of the American Veterinary Medical Association 187: 1224–1225.

      26 Kosan, M., Gonulalan, U., Ozturk, B. et al. (2008). Tissue reactions of suture materials (polyglactine 910, chromed catgut and polydioxanone) on rat bladder wall and their role in bladder stone formation. Urological Research 36: 43–49.

      27 Lloyd, R. and Lloyd, C. (2011). Surgical removal of a gastric foreign body in a sand tiger shark, Carcharias taurus Rafinesque. Journal of Fish Diseases 34: 951–953.

      28 MacPhail, C.M. (2019). Biomaterials, suturing, and hemostasis. In: Small Animal Surgery, 5e (ed. T.W. Fossum), 60–78. St. Louis, MO: Mosby.

      29 Marturello, D.M., McFadden, M.S., Bennett, R.A. et al. (2014). Knot security and tensile strength of suture materials. Veterinary Surgery 43: 73–79.

      30 McFadden, M., Bennett, R.A., Kinsel, M. et al. (2011). Evaluation of the histologic reactions to commonly used suture materials in the skin and musculature of ball pythons (Python regius). American Journal of Veterinary Research 72: 1397–1406.

      31 Millroy, E. (1976). An experimental study of the calcification and absorption of polyglycolic acid and catgut sutures within the urinary tract. Investigative Urology 14: 141–142.

      32 Molea, G., Schonauer, F., Bifulco, G. et al. (2000). Comparative study on biocompatibility and absorption times of three absorbable monofilament suture materials (ploydioxanone, poliglecaprone 25, and glycomer 631). British Journal of Plastic Surgery 53: 137–141.

      33 Montgomery, R. and Fitch, R. (2003). Muscle and tendon disorders. In: Textbook of Small Animal Surgery, 3e (ed. D. Slatter), 2264–2271. Philadelphia, PA: W.B. Saunders.

      34 Morris, M.C., Baquero, A., Redovan, E. et al. (1986). Urolithiasis on absorbable and nonabsorbable suture materials in the rabbit bladder. Journal of Urology 153: 602–603.

      35 Munday, C. and McGinn, F.P. (1976). A comparison of polyglycolic acid and catgut sutures in rat colonic anastomoses. British Journal of Surgery 63: 870–872.

      36 Nary‐Filho, H., Matsumoto, M.A., Batista, A.C. et al. (2002). Comparative study of tissue response to polyglecaprone 25, polyglactin 910, and polytetrefuorethylene suture material in rats. Brazilian Dental Journal 13: 86–91.

      37 Nematollahi, A., Bigham, A.S., Karimi, I., and Abbasi, F. (2010). Reactions of goldfish (Carassius auratus) to three suture patterns following full thickness skin incisions. Research in Veterinary Science 89: 451–454.

      38 Norton, T.M., Andres, K., and Li, S. (2014). Techniques for working with wild reptiles. In: Current Therapy in Reptile Medicine and Surgery (eds. D. Mader and S. Divers), 310–340. St Louis, MO: Elsevier Saunders.

      39 Onesti, M.G., Carella, S., and Scuderi, N. (2018). Effectiveness of antimicrobial‐coated sutures for the prevention of surgical site infection: a review of the literature. European Review for Medical and Pharmacological Sciences 22: 5729–5739.

      40 Petterino, C., Bedin, M., Vascellari, M. et al. (2010). An intra‐abdominal malignant mesenchymoma associated with nonabsorbable sutures in a ferret (Mustela putorius furo). Journal of Veterinary Diagnostic Investigation 22: 327–331.

      41 Pineros‐Fernandez,