Physics of the Terrestrial Environment, Subtle Matter and Height of the Atmosphere. Eric Chassefiere

Читать онлайн.
Название Physics of the Terrestrial Environment, Subtle Matter and Height of the Atmosphere
Автор произведения Eric Chassefiere
Жанр Биология
Серия
Издательство Биология
Год выпуска 0
isbn 9781119866152



Скачать книгу

light spread in the air can awaken it. Phosphorus phenomena have much to do with electrical phenomena.

      These bodies, which can shine and even ignite without any external contribution in the form of heat, were considered an important class of luminous bodies at the beginning of the 18th century, as we will see with the mercurial phosphorus, that is, the glow produced by the mercury rubbing against the glass of the barometer, a phenomenon in this case of an electrical nature. The contribution of heat by friction, which characterizes certain phosphorus of the second order, and which falls into the category of mechanical heat-generating actions described by Boyle, is not recognized as such by the author of the article, for whom the origin of the light emission is internal to the phosphorus, due to a pre-existing content of igneous matter.

      1.5.3. Light

      On the subject of light, the entry LUMIÈRE (LIGHT) in the DUF-1690 says:

      It is a very subtle, prompt, and uncluttered body that causes clarity, that illuminates, that gives color to all things, that shakes the eyes, and makes objects visible. Philosophers distinguish between primitive, or radical light, and second or derivative light. Primitive or radical light is that which is in the luminous body, and which consists of a certain movement of its parts, which makes them capable of pushing the subtle matter around, which fills the pores of transparent bodies. And the second or derived light is nothing else than the inclination to move, or the tendency of this subtle matter to move away in a straight line from the center of the luminous body.

      Against the Cartesian conception expressed above, borrowed from Jacques Rohault, the author opposes the atomist conception of Pierre Gassendi, which is also that of Newton, for whom light consists of the flow of an infinite number of light corpuscles “spreading with incredible speed on all sides”. René Descartes and Christiaan Huygens rejected the corpuscular approach to light, because how can such a considerable quantity of corpuscles be emitted by luminous bodies without being exhausted, and, on the other hand, how is it that inflamed corpuscles do not heat up the optic nerve at the same time as they illuminate it?

      DUF-1727 presents some additional elements, mentioning the equivocal character of light, which can be taken as “the particular feeling that the soul receives by the impression that luminous bodies make on the eyes”, or to designate “what is in these bodies by which they cause this particular feeling in the soul.” The same questioning is expressed for heat, as we have seen. The works of Nicolas Malebranche treating light by analogy with sound are mentioned. The time it takes light to pass from the Sun to the Earth, estimated at 11 minutes by Ole Christensen Roemer, thanks to the measured time lag of the moments when Jupiter eclipses some of its satellites, is indicated, and some considerations on the propagation of light and its colors are stated. The Encyclopédie takes up exactly the definition of the DUF, with the ambiguity between purely sensory effect and physical phenomenon. The Cartesian doctrine of the matter of the first element being agitated, which presses in all directions the small globules of the second element, compared to hard spheres that touch each other and instantaneously transmit the action of light to our eyes, is briefly described for criticism. The globules must be elastic, and not hard, for at least two reasons: first of all, the light is not transmitted instantaneously, as thought Descartes, then the light is reflected, which is not compatible with perfectly hard globules. Malebranche, for whom the parts of the luminous body in fast movement excite vibrations of pressure in the subtle matter which is between him and our eye, the amplitude and the frequency of these vibrations conditioning, respectively, the intensity and the color of the transmitted light, replaces the hard globules by swirls, while preserving the general design of Descartes and Huygens of a propagation of the light in the form of wave on a substrate of subtle matter. Huygens’ theory makes it possible to explain the refraction and the reflection, but does not account simply for the propagation of the light in a straight line, which, like sound, should propagate in all directions according to the undulatory assumption. Newton explained the straight-line propagation by the corpuscular hypothesis, “the action by which the body produces in us the sensation of clarity, consisting not in an effort to move, but in the real movement of these particles which move away from all sides of the luminous body in a straight line, and with an almost incredible speed,” Any obstacle in the path of a wave curves the train, and if the light were a wave, “the shadow would continuously bend it in its path”. As much as sound can follow a curved path, “we have never seen light move in a curved line; light rays are therefore small corpuscles that run with great speed from the luminous body.”

      Mr. Newton observes that bodies and rays of light act continuously on each other; bodies on rays of light, by throwing, reflecting, and refracting them; and rays of light on bodies, by heating them, and giving their parts a vibrating motion of which mainly heat consists: for he also notices that all fixed bodies, when they have been heated beyond a certain degree, become luminous, a quality which they seem to owe to the vibrating movement of their parts; and finally, that all bodies which abound in earthly and sulfurous parts, give off light if they are sufficiently agitated in any way. Thus, the sea becomes luminous in a storm; quicksilver, when shaken in a vacuum; cats and horses, when rubbed in the dark; wood, fish, and meat, when rotten.

      The author ends his entry by admitting his inability to choose between the wave hypothesis and the corpuscular hypothesis, of which “neither are demonstrated; and the wisest answer to the question of matter and the propagation of light would perhaps be to say that we don’t know.” He concludes by expressing the essential laws of optics, catoptrics and dioptrics: “With these simple propositions, the theory of light becomes a purely geometrical science, and its properties are demonstrated without knowing what it consists of or how it propagates.”

      For the author of the Lexicon entry LIGHT, the origin of