DeFi and the Future of Finance. Campbell R. Harvey

an oracle is any data source for reporting information external to the blockchain. How can we create an oracle that can authoritatively speak about off-chain information in a trust-minimized way? Many applications require an oracle, and the implementations exhibit varying degrees of centralization.

There are several implementations of oracles in various DeFi applications. A common approach is for an application to host its own oracle or hook into an existing oracle from a well-trusted platform. One Ethereum-based platform known as Chainlink³ is designed to solve the oracle problem by using an aggregation of data sources. The Chainlink white paper⁴ proposes a reputation-based system. We discuss the oracle problem later in more depth. Oracles are surely an open design question and challenge for DeFi to achieve utility beyond its own isolated chain.

STABLECOINS

A crucial shortcoming of many cryptocurrencies is excessive volatility. This adds friction to users who wish to take advantage of DeFi applications but don't have the risk-tolerance for a volatile asset like ETH. To solve this, an entire class of cryptocurrencies called stablecoins has emerged. Intended to maintain price parity with some target asset, USD, or gold, for instance, stablecoins provide the necessary consistency that investors seek to participate in many DeFi applications and allow a cryptocurrency native solution to exit positions in more volatile cryptoassets. They can even be used to provide on-chain exposure to the returns of an off-chain asset if the target asset is not native to the underlying blockchain (e.g., gold, stocks, exchange-traded funds [ETFs]). The mechanism by which the stablecoin maintains its peg varies by implementation. The three primary mechanisms are fiat-collateralized, crypto-collateralized, and non-collateralized stablecoins.

By far the largest class of stablecoins are fiat collateralized. These are backed by an off-chain reserve of the target asset. Usually they are custodied by an external entity or group of entities that undergo routine audits to verify the collateral's existence. The largest fiat-collateralized stablecoin is Tether⁵ (USDT) with a market capitalization of $62 billion, making it the third largest cryptocurrency behind Bitcoin and Ethereum at time of writing. Tether also has the highest trading volume of any cryptocurrency but is not audited.⁶ The second largest is USDC,⁷ and its holdings of USD are regularly audited. USDC is redeemable 1:1 for USD and vice versa for no fee on Coinbase's exchange. USDT and USDC are very popular to integrate into DeFi protocols as demand for stablecoin investment opportunities is high. There is an inherent risk to these tokens, however, as they are centrally controlled and maintain the right to blacklist accounts.⁸

The second largest class of stablecoins are crypto-collateralized, meaning they are backed by an overcollateralized amount of another cryptocurrency. Their value can be hard or soft pegged to the underlying asset depending on the mechanism. With a market capitalization of $5 billion as of writing, the most popular crypto-collateralized stablecoin is DAI, created by MakerDAO⁹ and and backed by ETH and other crypto assets. It is soft pegged with economic mechanisms that incentivize supply and demand to drive the price to $1. We will do a deep dive into MakerDAO and DAI in Chapter 6. Another popular crypto-collateralized stablecoin is sUSD, which is hard pegged to $1 through the Synthetix¹⁰ network token (SNX) exchange functionality. Crypto-collateralized stablecoins have the advantages of decentralization and secured collateral. The drawback is that their scalability is limited. To mint more of the stablecoin, a user must necessarily back the issuance by an overcollateralized debt position. In some cases like DAI, a debt ceiling further limits the supply growth.

The last and perhaps most interesting class of stablecoins are non-collateralized. Not backed by any underlying asset and using algorithmic expansion and supply contraction to shift the price to the peg, they often employ a seigniorage model where the token holders in the platform receive the increase in supply when demand increases. When demand decreases and the price slips below the peg, these platforms issue bonds of some form, which entitle the holder to future expansionary supply before the token holders receive their share. This mechanism works almost identically to the central bank associated with fiat currencies, with the caveat that these platforms have an explicit goal of pegging the price rather than funding government spending or other economic goals. A noteworthy early example of an algorithmic stablecoin is Basis,¹¹ which had to close due to regulatory hurdles. Current examples of algorithmic stablecoins include Ampleforth (AMPL)¹² and Empty Set Dollar (ESD).¹³ The drawback to non-collateralized stablecoins is that they have a lack of inherent underlying value backing the exchange of their token. In contractions, this can lead to “bank runs,” in which many holders are left with large sums of the token that are no longer worth the peg price.

There is still much work to be done – and regulatory hurdles to overcome – in creating a decentralized stablecoin that both scales efficiently and is resistant to collapse in contractions.¹⁴ Stablecoins are an important component of DeFi infrastructure because they allow users to benefit from the functionality of the applications without risking unnecessary price volatility.

DECENTRALIZED APPLICATIONS

As mentioned earlier, dApps are a critical DeFi ingredient. dApps are like traditional software applications except they live on a decentralized smart contract platform. The primary benefit of these applications is their permissionlessness and censorship resistance. Anyone can use them, and no single body controls them. A separate but related concept is a decentralized autonomous organization (DAO), which has its rules of operation encoded in smart contracts that determine who can execute what behavior or upgrade. It is common for a DAO to have some kind of governance token, which gives an owner some percentage of the vote on future outcomes. We will explore governance in much more detail later.

NOTES

      1 1. From a panel discussion at the Computer History Museum, see newsbtc, “Google Chairman Eric Schmidt: Bitcoin Architecture an Amazing Advancement,” newsbtc, 2014, https://www.newsbtc.com/news/google-chairman-eric-schmidt-bitcoin-architecture-amazing-advancement/.

      2 2. Fungible tokens have equal value just as every dollar bill has equal value and a $10 dollar bill is equal to two $5 dollar bills. Non-fungible tokens, in contrast, reflect the value of what they are associated with (e.g., one non-fungible token may be associated with a piece of art like a painting). They do not necessarily have equal value.

      3 3. Steve Ellis, Ari Juels, and Sergey Nazarov, “ChainLink: A Decentralized Oracle Network,” September 4, 2017, https://research.chain.link/whitepaper-v1.pdf?_ga=2.202512913.1239424617.1619728722-1563851301.1619728722.

      4