Kant. Andrew Ward

200

      202  201

      203  202

      204  203

      205  204

      206  205

      207  206

      208  207

      209  208

      210  209

      211  210

      212  211

      213  212

      214  213

      215  214

      216  215

      217  216

      218  217

      219  218

      220  219

      221  220

      222  221

      223  222

      224  223

      225  224

      226  225

      227  226

      228  227

      229  228

      230  229

      231  230

      232  231

      233  232

      234  233

      235  234

      236  235

      237  236

      238  237

      239  238

      240  239

      241  240

      242 241

      243  242

      244 243

      245 244

      246 245

      247 246

      248 247

      249 248

      250 249

      251 250

      252 251

      253 252

      254 253

      255  254

KANT

      The Three Critiques

      Andrew Ward

      polity

      Copyright © Andrew Ward 2006

      The right of Andrew Ward to be identified as Author of this Work has been asserted in accordance with the UK Copyright, Designs and Patents Act 1988.

      First published in 2006 by Polity Press

      Polity Press

      65 Bridge Street

      Cambridge CB2 1UR, UK

      Polity Press

      350 Main Street

      Malden, MA 02148, USA

      All rights reserved. Except for the quotation of short passages for the purpose of criticism and review, no part of this publication may be reproduced, stored in a retrieval system, or transmitted, in any form or by any means, electronic, mechanical, photocopying, recording or otherwise, without the prior permission of the publisher.

      ISBN-13: 978-15095-5112-5

      A catalogue record for this book is available from the British Library.

      The publisher has used its best endeavours to ensure that the URLs for external websites referred to in this book are correct and active at the time of going to press. However, the publisher has no responsibility for the websites and can make no guarantee that a site will remain live or that the content is or will remain appropriate.

      Every effort has been made to trace all copyright holders, but if any have been inadvertently overlooked the publishers will be pleased to include any necessary credits in any subsequent reprint or edition.

      For further information on Polity, visit our website: politybooks.com

Preface

      Over the last fifty years, there has been a widespread tendency among English-speaking philosophers to downplay Kant’s idealism. This seems to me to have been a mistake – so far, at least, as gaining an understanding of Kant’s own ideas is concerned. In this study, I offer an interpretation of the main themes in his three Critiques which places his mature thought squarely within the tradition of idealism: a tradition which includes the theories of Bishop Berkeley and of David Hume (however much Kant himself might have been surprised to learn that Hume falls into this tradition, and however much he would have disliked being compared with Berkeley).

      Going along with the emphasis on idealism, I attempt to explain a number of Kant’s central views – those concerning our knowledge of objects in space and time, the ground of our moral obligations and our judgments of beauty – as, in part, reactions to the scepticism and empiricism of Hume. The latter’s views and, more to the point, the arguments that he provides for them are generally both clear and invigorating. While Kant’s views are nearly always invigorating, his reasons for holding them are seldom clear, at least when considered out of context. By placing some of his key philosophical ideas alongside those of Hume, the aim is to elucidate Kant’s arguments and, thereby, to offer an assessment of his conclusions.

      A. W.

       London, January 2006

Abbreviations and Conventions

      CJCritique of Judgment (1790)CPractRCritique of Practical Reason (1788)CPRCritique of Pure Reason (1st edition 1781, 2nd edition 1787)ProlProlegomena to Any Future Metaphysics (1783)

      Quotations from Kant’s works are referred to by volume and page number in the German Akademie edition, Kants gesammelte Schriften, ed. Deutsche Akademie der Wissenschaften (Berlin: de Gruyter, 1900– ), with the exception of quotations from the Critique of Pure Reason, which are referred to by the pagination from the 1st edition of 1781 (cited as A) and/or the 2nd edition of 1787 (cited as B).

Acknowledgments

      I should like to express my thanks to Palgrave Macmillan