Manual de goniometría. Cynthia C. Norkin

Phys Ther 81:903, 2000.

      33. Rao, SR, et al: Increased passive ankle stiffness and reduced dorsiflexion range of motion in individuals with diabetes mellitus. Foot Ankle Int 27:617, 2006.

      34. Sauseng, S, Kastenbauer, T e Irsigler, K: Limited joint mobility in selected hand and foot joints in patients with type 1 diabetes mellitus: A methodology comparison. Diabetes Nutr Metab 15:1, 2002.

      35. Richard, RL y Ward, RS: Burns. En: O’Sullivan, SB y Schmitz, TJ (eds): Physical Rehabilitation: Assessment and Treatment, 5.^a ed. FA Davis, Filadelfia, 2014.

      36. Johnson, J y Silverberg, R: Serial casting of the lower extremity to correct contractures during the acute phase of burn care. Phys Ther 75:262, 1995.

      37. De Souza Campos, C, Jr, Bracht, MA y Dos Santos, MJ: The effect of joint hypomobility on precision grip force. J Hand Ther 26(4):323, 2013.

      38. Beazell, JR, et al: Treatment of lateral knee pain in addressing tibiofibular hypomobility in a recreational runner. N Am J Sports Phys Ther 4(1):21, 2009.

      39. Fritz, JM, et al: An examination of the selective tissue tension scheme, with evidence for the concept of a capsular pattern of the knee. Phys Ther 78:1046, 1998.

      40. Hayes, KW, Petersen, C y Falconer, J: An examination of Cyriax’s passive motion tests with patients having osteoarthritis of the knee. Phys Ther 74:697, 1994.

      41. Biji, D, et al: Validity of Cyriax’s concept capsular pattern for the diagnosis of osteoarthritis of hip and/or knee. Scand J Rheumatol 27:347, 1998.

      42. Klassbo, M y Harms-Ringdahl, K: Examination of passive ROM and capsular pattern in the hip. Physiother Res Int 8:1, 2003.

      43. Hertling, DH y Kessler, RM: Management of Common Musculoskeletal Disorders, 4.^a ed. Lippincott, Williams & Wilkins, Filadelfia, 2005.

      44. Waugh, KG, et al: Measurement of selected hip, knee and ankle joint motions in newborns. Phys Ther 63:1616, 1983.

      45. Castori, M: Ehler-Danlos syndrome, hypermobility type: An underdiagnosed hereditary connective tissue disorder with mucocutaneous, articular and systemic manifestations. G Ital Dermatol Venereol 1:13, 2013.

      46. Everman, DB y Robin, NH: Hypermobility syndrome. Pediatr Rev 19:111, 1998.

      47. Smith, TO, et al: Do people with benign joint hypermobility syndrome (BJHS) have reduced proprioception? A systematic review and meta-analysis. Rheumatol Int 33(11):2709, 2013.

      48. Grahame, R: Hypermobility not a circus act. Int J Clin Pract 54:314, 2000.

      49. Russek, LN: Hypermobility syndrome. Phys Ther 79:59, 1999.

      50. Lamari, NM, Chueire, AG y Cordeiro, JA: Analysis of joint mobility patterns among preschool children. Sao Paulo Med J 123:119, 2005.

      51. Beighton, P, Solomon, L y Soskolne, CL: Articular mobility in an African population. Ann Rheum Dis 32:23, 1973.

      52. Remvig, L, Jensen, DV y Ward, RC: Are diagnostic criteria for general joint hypermobility and benign joint hypermobility syndrome based on reproducible and valid tests? A review of the literature. J Rheumatol 34:798, 2007.

      53. Jelsma, LD, et al: The relationship between joint mobility and motor performance in children with and without the diagnosis of developmental coordination disorder. BMC Pediatr 13:35, 2013.

      54. Smits-Engelsman, B, Klerks, M y Kirby, A: Beighton score: A valid measure for generalized hypermobility in children. J Pediatr 158(1):119, 2011.

      55. Stefanyshyn, DJ y Ensberg, JR: Right to left differences in the ankle joint complex range of motion. Med Sci Sports Exerc 26:551, 1993.

      56. Mosley, AM, Crosbie, J y Adams, R: Normative data for passive ankle plantar flexion-dorsiflexion flexibility. Clin Biomech 16:514, 2001.

      57. Escalanate, A, et al: Determinants of hip and knee flexion range: Results from the San Antonio Longitudinal Study of Aging. Arthritis Care Res 12:8, 1999.

      58. Allender, E, et al: Normal range of joint movements in shoulder, hip, wrist and thumb with special reference to side: A comparison between two populations. Int J Epidemiol 3:253, 1974.

      59. Escalante, A, Lichtenstein, MJ y Hazuda, HP: Determinants of shoulder and elbow flexion range: Results from the San Antonio Longitudinal Study of Aging. Arthritis Care Res 12:277, 1999.

      60. Kendall, FP, et al: Muscles: Testing and Function With Posture and Pain, 5.^a ed. Lippincott, Williams & Wilkins, Filadelfia, 2005.

      61. Reese, NB y Bandy, WD: Joint Range of Motion and Muscle Length Testing. WB Saunders, Filadelfia, 2010.

      62. Drews, JE, Vraciu, JK y Pellino, G: Range of motion of the joints of the lower extremities of newborns. Phys Occup Ther Pediatr 4:49, 1984.

      63. Phelps, E, Smith, LJ y Hallum, A: Normal range of hip motion of infants between nine and 24 months of age. Dev Med Child Neurol 27:785, 1985.

      64. Wanatabe, H, et al: The range of joint motions of the extremities in healthy Japanese people: The differences according to age. Nippon Seikeigeka Gakkai Zasshi 53:275, 1979. Citado en: Walker, JM: Musculoskeletal development: A review. Phys Ther 71:878, 1991.

      65. Schwarze, DJ y Denton, JR: Normal values of neonatal limbs: An evaluation of 1000 neonates. J Pediatr Orthop 13:758, 1993.

      66. Broughton, NS, Wright, J y Menelaus, MB: Range of knee motion in normal neonates. J Pediatr Orthop 13:263, 1993.

      67. Roach, KE y Miles, TP: Normal hip and knee active range of motion: The relationship to age. Phys Ther 71:656, 1991.

      68. Steinberg, N, et al: Range of joint movement in female dancers and non-dancers aged 8-16 years: Anatomical and clinical implications. Am J Sports Med 34(5):814, 2006.

      69. Stubbs, NB, Fernandez, JE y Glenn, WM: Normative data on joint ranges of motion for 25 to 54-year-old males. Int J Ind Ergon 12:265, 1993.

      70. Walker, JM, et al: Active mobility of the extremities in older subjects. Phys Ther 64:919, 1984.

      71. Bell, RD y Hoshizaki, TB: Relationship of age and sex with range of motion: Seventeen joint actions in humans. Can J Appl Sport Sci 6:202, 1981.

      72. Kalscheur, JA, Costello, PS y Emery, LJ: Gender differences in range of motion in older adults. Phys Occup Ther Geriatr 22:77, 2003.

      73. Almquist, PO, et al: Knee motion in healthy individuals related to age and gender. J Orthop Res 31(1):23, 2013.

      74. Lansade, C, et al: Three-dimensional analysis of the cervical spine kinematics: Effect of age and gender in healthy subjects. Spine 34(26): 2900, 2009.

      75. Youdas, JW, et al: Normal range of motion of the cervical spine: An initial goniometric study. Phys Ther 72:770, 1992.

      76. Chen, J, et al: Meta-analysis of normative cervical motion. Spine 24: 1571, 1999.

      77. Salo, PK, et al: Quantifying the effect of age on passive range of motion of the cervical spine in healthy working-age women. J Orthop Sports Phys Ther 39:478, 2009.

      78. Loebl, WY: Measurement of spinal posture and range of spinal movement. Ann Phys Med 9:103, 1967.

      79. Fitzgerald, GK, et al: Objective assessment with establishment of normal values for lumbar spinal range of motion. Phys Ther 63:1776, 1983.

      80. Intolo, P, et al: The effect of age on lumbar range of motion: A systematic review. Man Ther 14:596, 2009.

      81. Trudelle-Jackson, E, et al: Lumbar spine flexion